The AMD Ryzen All In One Thread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2

AMD Ryzen 3000 'Matisse Refresh' Desktop CPUs Confirmed - Launching in July, Faster Clocks & Price Drops For Existing CPUs

A few hours ago, a rumor emerged that AMD was working on new Ryzen 3000 Desktop CPUs but we can confirm that there are at least three chips in the works.
The Matisse Refresh lineup will be featuring the following CPUs:

• AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (Ryzen 9 3900X Replacement)
• AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT (Ryzen 7 3800X Replacement)
• AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (Ryzen 5 3600X Replacement)

Starting off with what to expect from the Matisse Refresh family, the core configuration is going to remain the same.
The Ryzen 9 3900XT will feature 12 cores and 24 threads, the Ryzen 7 3800XT will feature 8 cores and 16 threads while the Ryzen 5 3600XT will feature 6 cores and 12 threads.
What is interesting is that all three CPUs will feature higher clock speeds & enhanced overclock support.
Our sources also suggest that the boost algorithms for the new CPUs are more tightly tuned which should result in 5-10% performance improvement over existing parts.

 

Zen 2+

Interesting.

 

This could turn out to be a really bad idea. Why? If the 15-17% IPC uplift for Zen 3 is true then what happens when AMD release the XT variants of the current CPU lineup?
Will the Zen 3 performance gain be reduced to 5-10% then ?

 

I don’t think there’s a process change. They’ll just clock a bit higher than the original ones.

 

Need moar 5GHz performance....

 

4.6 4.7 4.8GHz?
1C Boost.... maby it can be done.

UPD. I was right

 

Linus Torvalds Announcement:

The biggest excitement this week for me was just that I upgraded my main machine, and for the first time in about 15 years, my desktop isn't Intel-based.
No, I didn't switch to ARM yet, but I'm now rocking an AMD Threadripper 3970x.

My 'allmodconfig' test builds are now three times faster than they used to be, which doesn't matter so much right now during the calming down period,
but I will most definitely notice the upgrade during the next merge window.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2005.3/00406.html

Goood move!

 

AMD
Ryzen 5000 ‘Cezanne’ APUs With Zen 3 & 7nm Vega in 2021,
Ryzen 6000 ‘Rembrandt’ APUs With Zen 3+ & RDNA 2 in 2022,
Van Gogh With Zen 2 & RDNA 2 For Ultra-Low Power Devices



-> https://wccftech.com/amd-cezanne-ryzen-5000-rembrandt-ryzen-6000-van-gogh-apus-detailed/

 

Why does AMD still advertise or even state a base speed? What is the definition of base when the cpu never functions at the stated base speed; at least in my case. 3800X supposedly has a base speed of 3.9GHz. Have yet to see an instance where the cpu did not steadily function below the stated base. Base speed for my cpu has proven to be 3.775 or 3.8GHz. Everyone appears to focus on the upper limit of the cpu. Have yet to read anything about the base speed being off, and still off. My opinion is that if they cannot nail down the proper base speed, how can they even hope to nail down the top boost speed?

 

Fake ?
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2222740-1-1.html

 

^Looks like nope fakes.

 

Mine is fluctuating all't time, 0MHz up to set in RM speed
So i have 200MHz C3 and 4300MHz C1.... up & down all the time.
But it's OK, everything is workig fast and stable, so it must be that way for AMD CPU uArch.

 

So I got a VR headset last week and Half Life Alyx absolutely flogs both my CPU and video card but it's crunching out some fantastic game play. Glad I opted for the 3700X.

 

I have no problems with great 0.01% Lows with my 4x8GB at 3800 CL16 1T
With my Vega i don't need more than 4.15GHz... to have 70FPS in any of my Games (BF1, BFV, Forza H4, Div2, GR:B etc.)

-> https://www.techspot.com/review/1891-ryzen-memory-performance-scaling/

 

PCIe 6.0 Specification Features

- Delivers 64 GT/s raw bit rate and up to 256 GB/s via x16 configuration
- Utilises PAM-4 (Pulse Amplitude Modulation with four levels) encoding and leverages existing 56G PAM-4 in the industry
- Includes low-latency Forward Error Correction (FEC) with additional mechanisms to improve bandwidth efficiency
- Maintains backwards compatibility with all previous generations of PCIe technology

To put the performance of PCIe 6.0 into context, it could enable M.2 devices to deliver speeds that are up to eight times faster than today's Samsung 970 Pro series SSD, which is widely regarded as one of the best performing PCIe 3.0 M.2 SSDs on the market.
Another way to put it is with PCIe 6.0, the performance of a PCIe 3.0 16x configuration is equivalent to two PCIe 6.0 lanes.

 

IMhO it will be enough when Next-Gen Games (NVMe compatibile) hit us
Yes it's RAM cached....

 

4gb wasn't even enough even 5 years ago.

 

What is this garbled nonsense?