Intel's all 5 GHz cores Core i9 9900KS Processor Available next month (October)

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Sep 4, 2019.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,325
    Likes Received:
    18,408
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Lilith likes this.
  2. jwb1

    jwb1 Guest

    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    157
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 2080 Ti
    Its a binned 9900k. Just like the 8086k was a binned 8700k.

    Lots of normal 9900k's can reach all core 5Ghz, but I guess if you want to pay for the guarantee.... My 9900k does 5.1ghz all core @ 1.3v.

    But yeah, at least the Intel CPUs can actually reach their advertised clock speeds.
     
    MegaFalloutFan and TekkMarine like this.
  3. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    180
    GPU:
    Sapph RX 570 4G ITX
    Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2019
  4. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,201
    Likes Received:
    4,105
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080
    https://www.techspot.com/article/1880-ryzen-3600x-vs-3600/

    ~4% performance increase for a ~4% clockspeed increase - "nearly 0 performance"

    You should keep writing the same thing in every thread though I think after 8 times you'll finally be right.
     

  5. rl66

    rl66 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,922
    Likes Received:
    839
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX 6700 XT
    Yeah and pay for that extra price. You don't even notice a performance difference at the Zen 2 CPUs that can't hit the max boost clock as the 200 Hz boost clock difference between the 3600 and 3600X results in nearly 0 performance difference. Hope you cried so much about the GTX 970's 3,5 GB issue. 80% of the PC builders realized Ryzens have much better value than Intel (Mindfactory, Japanese sales). You are in the milked 20%. GLHF blue boy.[/QUOTE]

    On intel it's the same, between 4.8 and 5.0 there is almost no perf increase... (exept some that consider 2FPS as a huge gain lol)
    Also on price argument it depend a lot on where you are.
    In here:
    - Intel I9 9900KS: 579,95 Euro
    - AMD Ryzen 9 3900X : 639,94 Euro
    Both aviable soon
    milk argument is invalid as motherboard also are at the same price since few years

    Anyway i have both side dual Xeon + Quadro to work and Athlon GE (Ryzen) for anything under TV set.
    AMD or Intel? up to the user taste because at the end it's the same
     
  6. anticupidon

    anticupidon Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,864
    Likes Received:
    4,115
    GPU:
    Polaris/Vega/Navi
    Big yawn.
    Anyone wanna chat about weather?
    Because about CPUs is too much hassle.
     
  7. vbetts

    vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,140
    Likes Received:
    1,743
    GPU:
    GTX 1080 Ti
    How about, let's both keep fan boy posts out of here everyone.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2019
    mezball and ZXRaziel like this.
  8. gerardfraser

    gerardfraser Guest

    Messages:
    3,343
    Likes Received:
    764
    GPU:
    R9 290 Crossfire
    The forum in the Intel slides awesome.Going to be a good gaming CPU,I would never give up my AMD CPU for this but for those who buy this.Enjoy.
     
    -Tj- likes this.
  9. Picolete

    Picolete Master Guru

    Messages:
    494
    Likes Received:
    261
    GPU:
    Sapphire Pulse 6800
    I seriously doubt the info on the last slide
     
    Neo Cyrus and DG21 like this.
  10. D3M1G0D

    D3M1G0D Guest

    Messages:
    2,068
    Likes Received:
    1,341
    GPU:
    2 x GeForce 1080 Ti
    I consider this similar to the 9990XE - a specialty product designed to feed the e-peen. It could also be Intel's attempt to spoil the launch of the 3950X (and possibly Threadripper).

    As I've said elsewhere, I see little point in such a CPU (if you want string single-core performance then buy the 9900K, and if you want strong multi-core then buy AMD), but I'm sure fanboys will gobble it up.
     

  11. Strange Times

    Strange Times Master Guru

    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    110
    GPU:
    RX 6600 XT
    prepare your bath with cold water to cool this thing
     
  12. AndyMutz

    AndyMutz Master Guru

    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    19
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX3080 FTW3
    "The existing Core i9 9900K, which has one core active up to 5 GHz"

    the 5 GHz turbo applies up to two active cores.

    -andy-
     
  13. DG21

    DG21 Member Guru

    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    49
    GPU:
    1080Ti WF Extreme
    100% agreed!!! Especially the HEDT-ones for socket 2066 or whatsoever socket it'll be, but hey... if intel keeps word, why not. :)
     
  14. Kool64

    Kool64 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    782
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 4070
    Rumor has it they are sniping the best of the cores for the KS and leaving the K and KF in the dustbin. So the K and KF are essentially obsolete.
     
    gx-x likes this.
  15. Silva

    Silva Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,048
    Likes Received:
    1,196
    GPU:
    Asus Dual RX580 O4G
    Oh Intel, unless you get 10nm working efficiently, you can't compete.
    The last 3 years Intel has been loosing mindshare, and that shows on sales.
    I'm all in for competition, and hope Intel finally brings 10nm fabs up and running, or soon AMD will find that they can charge more for hardware too!
     

  16. MonstroMart

    MonstroMart Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    878
    GPU:
    RX 6800 Red Dragon
    Coming to a store near you for the very affordable price of 12 grands ;) /s
     
    Silva likes this.
  17. Clanger

    Clanger Guest

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    166
    GPU:
    igpu
    cpu talk is boring, id rather watch flies shag. that said it would be nice to see some 5ghz 4 core parts with 2666mhz ram or higher, not everyone is running skynet.
     
  18. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    No offense but that’s a little hypersensitive of you to “warn” users that pointed out something that is factually correct.

    OT- I wonder if the price of this will be higher than the 9900k or will they slot is at the $500 spot and lower the 9900k price?
     
  19. Agonist

    Agonist Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    1,312
    GPU:
    XFX 7900xtx Black
    Its not hypersensitive. Fanboys are cancer and ruin threads. And Intel ones are the worst right now. Too much little penis syndrome as of late.

    As a user of both sides, I can not stand Intel fans right now.
     
    Order_66 likes this.

Share This Page