Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z (6G)

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Jan 15, 2019.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,541
    Likes Received:
    18,853
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z (6G) Today we review the all new GeForce RTX 2060 from MSI, it is their top model, the GAMING Z edition. This puppy has daunting looks and comes factory tweaked t...

    Review: MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z (6G)
     
  2. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    25,478
    Likes Received:
    12,883
    GPU:
    XFX RX6800XT 16GB
    Nice review and nice looking card. If you get you hands on Aorus 2060 extreme please do a review HH, thanks.

    Gaming Z should be top tier but even so 380€ is really steep.
     
  3. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    That now famous MSI tax. Great card however.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  4. mrbull3tproof

    mrbull3tproof Guest

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    r9 390
    So besides juuuust slightly lower noise level it has same temps and performance as (probably) much cheaper Palit version.
     

  5. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    Yeah and lets not forget how good the reference cooler is on this card.
     
    airbud7 and tunejunky like this.
  6. tunejunky

    tunejunky Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    3,071
    GPU:
    7900xtx/7900xt
    this looks to be a winner

    but c'mon expecting RT performance from this is a bad joke. however this is a solid performer otherwise.

    the cooler on MSI cards are worth the "tax" and if you're going to put it into a loop just get the "aero" where you're not paying for the twin frozr.
    and if you can pay for the better clocks of the gaming x, cool.
     
    Loophole35 likes this.
  7. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    This card though doesn't seem to need the additional cooling headroom however.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    that's the FE you can get from Nvidia at MSRP right now.
     
    airbud7 and tunejunky like this.
  8. tunejunky

    tunejunky Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    3,071
    GPU:
    7900xtx/7900xt
    yeah, still puzzled (and aib makers miffed) at Nvidia's direct sales.

    i will say, for what it's worth - the FE of the RTX cards are the best made and "feeling" cards i've ever seen from Nvidia.
    idk if that makes them worth buying, but if i had one i'd like the quality of manufacture.
     
  9. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    180
    GPU:
    Sapph RX 570 4G ITX
    ASUS Dual costs $395, Strix is $415. Let me have a guess.
     
  10. FrostNixon

    FrostNixon Master Guru

    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    57
    GPU:
    RX 5700 XT
    As much as I want to support AMDA I don't feel like they can reach the performance of 2060 for this price with the next release. Not to mention it won't be anywhere in the next 6 months ..
     

  11. metagamer

    metagamer Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,596
    Likes Received:
    1,165
    GPU:
    Asus Dual 4070 OC
    Amazing, this thing pretty much matches a 1080 at a very competitive card.
     
  12. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,492
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    Asus RX6700XT
    GTX2060 is going for $350 to $415 USD.... If prices hold, I'll probably be picking one up in the summer since NVidia has decided to support adaptive-sync.... Like FrostNixon, I don't see Navi touching the performance at a similar price.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  13. quantum hacker

    quantum hacker Guest

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    31
    GPU:
    GTX 275 - 896 MB
    NIce, but should be $250 max since it can barely do 4K/60fps just like the 1080. This performance IS low-end now.

    You guys holding onto 1080-1440p (phone resolutions) are like the 800x600/1024x768 holdouts when 1080p became a thing. Better to just move on and accept that 4k is the new standard for the forseeable future and stop wasting time and money with anything less. If you haven't bought into 4k yet and are contemplating a new build... save your money till you can enter the 4k realm and save yourself from having to do yet another upgrade relatively soon when all the kiddies are playing 4k in their bedrooms and you're jealous that console players have a higher res than you.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2019
  14. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,492
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    Asus RX6700XT
    4K is far from being the "new standard"....lol When mid-range graphics cards can run at 4K with 60fps minimum at reasonable settings, it might become mainstream. As of now, 1080 dominates the mainstream and will continue to for at least the next few years.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  15. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    60Hz lol what a noob. 144Hz or nothing. Refresh rate > resolution any day. (Within reason I’m not playing sub 1920x1080)
     
    airbud7 and Robbo9999 like this.

  16. quantum hacker

    quantum hacker Guest

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    31
    GPU:
    GTX 275 - 896 MB
    Fools.

    First. Yes, 4k is standard despite you not owning it because you continuing to fund overpriced nvidia low end performance cards and panel manufacturers who continue to milk 2000's level tech. Don't you get that phone's have been doing 1440p for years and 4k monitors have been out for nearly a decade already!?! All new TVs now are f**king 4K.

    Second. OF COURSE 60HZ IS LOW AND THIS CARD CAN NOT DO IT at 4K CONSISTENTLY. DEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2019
  17. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,492
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    Asus RX6700XT
    Why would anyone waste money on 4K when you could just go 8K?
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  18. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    I have two 4K panels at my house and both do full 4:4:4 chroma yet I still find myself going back to my QHD 144Hz G-sync display.
     
    airbud7 likes this.
  19. Cyberdyne

    Cyberdyne Guest

    Messages:
    3,580
    Likes Received:
    308
    GPU:
    2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra
    According to Digital Foundry, using High textures in BF5 gets you around 70 FPS with ray tracing. Seems the horse power is there actually, despite what people keep saying. But BF5 has issues with VRAM management with ray tracing on, and 6 GB gets tapped out.
     
    Robbo9999 likes this.
  20. Robbo9999

    Robbo9999 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    442
    GPU:
    RTX 3080
    Yep, I saw this too (Ultra textures lowers the fps), this is added support to my thinking that the RTX 2060 with only 6GB VRAM isn't really a card to last much beyond yr 2020 - or in other words until NVidia release their next gen of cards on 7nm process shrink...I just see this card as a stop gap to last until that point.
     

Share This Page