Review: Kingdom Come: Deliverance PC graphics performance analysis

Game development started at 2011.

Do you even know the difference between DX11 and DX12, beside CPU utilization and that DX12 only works with Win10?
Or you just barking at DX11 cause its 1 digit behind DX12?

 

Y...years behind...thats why dx12versus11 is almost always slower...
I want vulcan games...

 

Cheers, just seen the price, il hold off for a while until its patched and the price drops, ive got REs Evil and Tomb Raider to play first.

 

3820oc 4C 8t, does a great job withthe gtx 1080 Ti.

 

It's been updated a bit here and there though, still not too sure if there's all that many games actually using features from the later version but we're up to DirectX 11.4 as of I think it was Windows 10 RS2 though most games use 11.1 and it's only been recently that games have outright required support for it.

 

I'm surprised to see it scale so well up to 6c/12t at 1080p considering it's a DX11 title.
If anything, it makes me question DX12. So far I haven't seen it show any impressive performance. Vulkan on the other hand seems to have proven itself, at least somewhat.

 

Tried it out and I noticed my GPU dropping clock by 20-40MHz occasionally, which drops the FPS somewhat. Which is weird since I get like 45-55 FPS on 1440p medium on my 290. I would expect 100% load and 100% clock all the time - as The Witcher 3 does for me.

It was always possible to offload some tasks to CPU cores, even before DX12 (like Skyrim did with shadows). DX12 just makes it easier to implement properly.

 

CPU gets more FPS, not GPU. Not sure if dx12 performs better overall.

 

Hey Hilbert, any chance we could get 8600k CPU scaling results? or maybe 6c6t on your 5960x? kinda interested to see how real cores VS threads works with this game.

 

Nice! great work as usual Hilbert, look forward to the 6c6t results!

 

Thanks Boss!

Look at that 6600k difference. Pretty much sums up why it's not good idea to buy 4c4t processor anymore.

 

Nice, so looks like 6c6t is definitely better than 4c8t but 6c12t is definitely getting some use out of those extra threads (well at least it does when things become more cpu bound at 1920x1080 and lower)

 

Well I am just stating a fact to all of those ppl thinking it is a good idea to use this game for benchmarking just because its a new game... it is not, it is unfair to use it while it doesn't offer new features from DX12 as well as Vulkan - both of which use more of Radeon powahh...

Enlarging virtually this problem... you would not want a DX8 title as an example for testing TITAN V

 

Its a benchmark of a game, why complicate things, a new game comes out, people want to know about it and how well it may run on their gfx hardware, simples, who cares what DX variant it uses, it is what it is, play or do not.

 

a benchmark of a game yes... a game used for benchmarking NO

 

Well done, you are trying to win a game only you are playing.