Download link: http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/final-fantasy-xv-windows-edition-benchmark-download.html ~3.7GB Post your scores
Here is my score, looks like 980Ti @1420MHz is on its limits here, saw drops to low 50ish fps in heavy fight scene High @ 1080p Although there is some streaming stutter issue, even on SSD. Max vram was 5.1GB.. EDIT: could be optimal power fault, now at max perf. and @standard it was ok.. Will test @high again. Standard@1080p
Not even close to the 980ti. I also have a weaker CPU and half the system memory. I noticed the stutter as well.
Too me. i7-4790K@4.4GHz, EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC+@stock with v390.65 driver (HQ with higher LOD, optimal power as default and rest default) and... !!NEW!! SSD OCZ RD400 512GB but @PCIe 2.0 x16@x4 because ASUS Z97 Pro Gamer hasn't PCIe 3.0 x16@x4 slot. High 1080p - MSI Afterburner OSD disabled https://imgur.com/XCVqIj2
SLI would have been nice, and may have made 4k playable with some tweaked settings. It's good that they go out their way to announce no SLI/CF, saves people buying the game and having expectations that it may change in the future. Sounds is weird for me, i got massive corruption on the 1080p run and no audio on the 2160p one.
Ok, after I created profile and set prefer max performance its a little better, got 100 points more I saw some extra particles (turf) and hair on animals on high, but that has at least 30-40fps impact compared to standard. EDIT: 4K High it looks nice Downsampled, 25-40fps.. somewhat smooth like @1080p, eats all vram..
No OC, just allowed 120% power target on the card so it can stretch its legs a bit. This looks to be about the same level of demanding, if not more, than Assassin'S Creed Origins. I know a LOT of people will be very disappointed. Some details: - there were frame drops, some quite significant, on High, even @1080p. A bit of stuttering as well, but the framedrops (for example about the time when starting to ride that bird thing/entering the furry animals zone) were horrible - the CPU usage is significant. I expect this to be the first thing to piss people off. It uses 12 threads on my 8700K, CPU is usually around 50%, but it did went as high as 85%. It seems necessary to keep a 1070Ti fed @1080p/High. So if you have a lower end CPu and a good card, there might be issues, but we'll still need to wait for the game to be released - VRAM usage is topping around 5 GB in my case. 16 GB of system RAM seems enough - since this uses Hairworks, I hope for a AA slider like Witcher 3. It helped my GTX 970 quite a bit, the game would not be playable at 60 fps with 8xMSAA on the hair, but was fine with 4xMSAA. These settings should be the first to be turned down, as they offer minimal image quality improvement for insane GPU power requirements - 4K/Standard is... playable on my PC, I guess - if you're the console type and accept 30fps. I'll definitely stick to 1080p however. Overall, it does look good and promising. But if it will stutter as much in the game itself, I'm not buying this.
VRAM usage: 3522MB CPU usage: ~55% RAM usage: 5529MB Pagefile usage: 11455MB i5-7600K @ 4.7GHz 16GB @ 3200MHz RX580 (8GB) @ 1400/8800MHz Despite of the X360 graphics, I did run into hiccups and frame stutters. Conclusion: lack of PC performance optimizations. However I'm still looking forward to play the game and watch Prompto dance.
During the fight scene my razer blackwidow x's leds shut off and everytime the character attacks it blinked in yellow 1080 at 2038/1400 r7 1700 at 3.9ghz ram is at 3.2g cl16 on the 960 evo i had stutters here and there. Here's fhd:
Is the score just avg fps x 100? SLI/CF sure are dead nowadays.... Interesting they even have a website ranking all the graphics cards based on scores collected from users....
It ran like complete piss for me. Crappy score. I installed it on my 960 evo too. Vram was maxed out at 1080p High settings. FPS was low, but gpu usuage was constant 99% and cpu usuage was low around 45%
Would love to know what hardware was used for that nvidia video released back in August showing it running @4k60fps.
