New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's

Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon' started by OnnA, Jul 9, 2016.

  1. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
  2. morrk

    morrk Member

    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    15
    GPU:
    Red Devil 6800XT
    Has there been any kind of time frame announced for them yet?
     
  3. Maddness

    Maddness Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,440
    Likes Received:
    1,738
    GPU:
    3080 Aorus Xtreme
    I haven't seen any so far.
     
  4. Ryu5uzaku

    Ryu5uzaku Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,547
    Likes Received:
    608
    GPU:
    6800 XT
    I don't understand how they can actually and think no one would notice especially in this age :D

    It's amazing actually.
     

  5. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,138
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
  6. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Guest

    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    3,371
    GPU:
    6900XT+AW@240Hz
    That's False. Comparing Fiji launch driver to current ones is night and day situation.
    Even few months after launch AMD was fixing huge driver overhead.
    Even compute tasks which are CPU independent saw 10~15% gain within few months.
    BF4 saw 19% avg. fps gain within few months. WH 40k: Space Marine got 20% uplift on minimum fps and bigger gains on avg/maximum. (Not important anymore since minimum fps on 1440p was 130.)
    Payday 2 had huge gains on 4k too, avg. ~28%, minimum ~26%.

    And that's just comparing launch driver (June 2015) to 15.200.1023.10 (August 2015).
    Yes, there were games which utilized GPU properly like Witcher 3. Those saw only minimal gains over time, but most games gained a lot over last 2 years.
     
  7. Barry J

    Barry J Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes Received:
    152
    GPU:
    RTX2080 TRIO Super


    I hope Vega does get a boost with improved drivers I think the FuryX boosts were down to the new 1st gen HBM and getting games to work well with it, Vega is 2nd gen HBM so you would think they know how to use the hardware but lets hope the driver team dropped the ball, and there working hard to make it better.
     
  8. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Guest

    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    3,371
    GPU:
    6900XT+AW@240Hz
    AMD almost always screws initial drivers. And Fiji was "just" evolution from GPU perspective. Vega has some very new and advanced things in GPU and can be called "a bit on revolutionary side" in comparison.
     
  9. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,125
    Likes Received:
    969
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    I'm almost certain that Vega will end up faster than Pascal, maybe with the exception of the Ti. The power consumption is still ridiculous though.

    The order of purchasing for me, at this moment, would be RX 580 < Vega 56 < 1080Ti. Nothing else seems to make much sense.
     
  10. Chastity

    Chastity Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,738
    Likes Received:
    1,662
    GPU:
    Nitro 5700XT/6800M
    Considering my recent purchase of a 28" 4K panel, I am encountering the limits of my 390 on some games. DOOM is fine, but DA:I needs some love. I'd like to see how the Vega56 compares to the 390, and maybe a 3rd party card will come with watercooling.
     

  11. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    I don't like using this site but this is a good article here. https://m.hardocp.com/article/2017/01/30/amd_video_card_driver_performance_review_fine_wine/1

    So basically only one game gained a huge chunk after launch driver Fallout 4 (**** game engine). And of course Doom Vulcan but that was to be expected and not indicative of the usual "fine wine". With the exception of games that drivers were poorly optimized for AKA AMD didn't have "game ready" drivers the Fiji did not pull a Hawaii.

    Look at where it sits even now. It is a good card but still has not lived up to its theoretical performance. It should be matching the 1080 in DX12 titles IMO. The only explanation I can think of is memory bottleneck.

    BTW your BF4 example is under Mantle correct?
     
  12. Stormyandcold

    Stormyandcold Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,872
    Likes Received:
    446
    GPU:
    RTX3080ti Founders
    I would've liked to see AMD's OpenGL improvements in Doom across drivers. However, overall a 5-6% difference is ok, but, this "Fine wine" thing doesn't seem much different to Nvidias improvements over time tbh.
     
  13. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    In the case of Fiji no the improvements were comparable to the normal improvements Nvidia sees. Now Tahiti and Hawaii got massive improvements over time to the tune of some 35%. Mostly due to AMD's driver team starting to figure out GCN.
     
  14. Humanoid_1

    Humanoid_1 Guest

    Messages:
    959
    Likes Received:
    66
    GPU:
    MSI RTX 2080 X Trio
    Info leaking out about a RX Vega hitting 1,980 core and 1,000 memory and beating out the Asus RoG Strix 1080Ti in many games in DX12
    ....even edging out the Ti in GTA V too.

    Though the machine draws 532 Watts at the wall.


    Very nice performance though ^^
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2017
  15. Agent-A01

    Agent-A01 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,631
    Likes Received:
    1,128
    GPU:
    4090 FE H20
    Thinking the Vega will end up even close to the Ti is a stretch.

    That's like a 30-40% gap it would have to close.

    Unless drivers are just total ****, but surely they aren't that incompetent.

    1980 is not possible.

    Driver displaying wrong clock.

    Buildzoid said the most he could do was like 1780 under LN2
     
    Maddness and pharma like this.

  16. OnnA

    OnnA Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,852
    Likes Received:
    6,743
    GPU:
    TiTan RTX Ampere UV
    Rise of the Tomb Raider

    Square Enix just revealed that Rise of the Tomb Raider will have Xbox One X support with the game running at native 4K resolution. There are also a bunch of additional enhancements planned.

    The update will be available on November 7th, when the Xbox One X console is launching, for free. Check out the trailer below and read our review of the game here.

    Developed in partnership with Nixxes Software, the Xbox One X enhancements for the award-winning game include premiere graphics and other technical enhancements that leverage the full power of Xbox One X with settings that gamers can tailor to their taste.

    Xbox One X players can choose from one of three visual modes, including:

    Native 4K: (full 3840 by 2160) for highest fidelity resolution
    Enriched Visuals for stunning graphic upgrades
    High Frame Rate for the smoothest possible gameplay

    New Xbox One X tech enhancements for Rise of the Tomb Raider include:

    HDR display support for more vibrant and accurate color representation technology
    Spatial audio support, including Dolby Atmos®, for true 3D audio
    Enhanced texture resolution for Lara Croft®, NPCs, and environments, leveraging additional memory offered by the Xbox One X
    Improved anti-aliasing for immersive realistic details

    Additional visual enhancements include:

    Improved volumetric lights
    Improved reflections
    Enhanced foliage
    Upgraded polygonal detail
    Amplified texture filtering
     
  17. OnnA

    OnnA Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,852
    Likes Received:
    6,743
    GPU:
    TiTan RTX Ampere UV
    EA Live at Gamescom 2017




    start at 26min
     
  18. pharma

    pharma Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,485
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 1080
  19. OnnA

    OnnA Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,852
    Likes Received:
    6,743
    GPU:
    TiTan RTX Ampere UV
    Some funny stuff, And i know it works great when Tweaked :D
    Yes, without GimpWorks
    Why oh why?

    [​IMG]
     
  20. OnnA

    OnnA Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,852
    Likes Received:
    6,743
    GPU:
    TiTan RTX Ampere UV
    Fire Strike Custom 1.1 = 26100
    -> http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/21665850

    ~1730/1050 already puts V64 at a GPU score of approximately 25000, 10% from drivers puts it just under 28k.

    To those willing to push very high wattage under water they may come close to 29/30k, IF, IFFF there are 10% gains to be had from drivers.

    Also from Vega user:
    "Card is now happily chugging along at sustained 1630Mhz/1100Mhz with 0% power target with core @ 1060mV. Truly amazing [​IMG] these cards come out of the factory wayyyyy overvolted."

    wayyyyy overvolted huh? Fury users knows that :p
    1.168v +8% and 16.234 3Dmarks GPU 1050/570

    I will go for ~1.000v
     

Share This Page