Idk why the changed the method of testing but AMD scores are indeed disappointing. I'll show that picture you posted until you get 10 posts.
what ever it is that they did it definitely has an intel bias, those fx cpus have taken a much greater hit than they should have, have a hard time believing that a 6700k only has a 28% ipc advantage over a core 2 quad. seems that by "fixing" the benchmark for ryzen they broke it for comparing "realistic" performance on alot of other cpus.
The latest xeon hack in play(no overclocking) e5 2686 v3 18c/36t 2.9ghz-->3.5ghz http://i.imgur.com/eg5qtbB.jpg
Did a quick retest with newest scoring system and ST looks quite good for 2400MHZ ram https://valid.x86.fr/bench/pu4h9q/1
The 'ol i5-750 has officially been retired. I've not even been in windows 30mins. All stock, default settings. Tiem to get dirty! Wish I'd benched the 750 after the updates, to compare, for shits 'n giggles.
4.5Ghz* Looking a bit better. Useless info but it's great that Intel stuck with the same mounting throughout 1156/1150 etc. Noctua U12P SE2 still going strong!
Thought id re-start this thread seeing cpuz just released rtx support and beta benchmarks with avx2 support. Heres my result's https://imgur.com/fmnnFaK i7-6850K @ 4.4ghZ
You can compete for single core or all core or both. Simply open CPUz and navigate to the Bench tab. Then take a snip of your results like this (below) and post it here. If we get enough interest, I will create a leaderboard. Feel free to include any other relevant info on your OC / setup if you wish.
I believe the issue with CPU-Z is that you can easily obtain scores despite extremely unstable configuration. Here i overclocked my CPU to improve single thread performance, it's not stable AT ALL.