Tomb Raider (2015): Rise of the Tomb Raider

Yep, on Windows 10. OK thanks. The Green bar got me confused.

 

I imagine that the rivatuner osd wont work on the store version tho.

 

Looks like theres no region lock on steam, i did use VPN to activate it but i can start it and play without VPN.

But steam doesn't show that i'm playing though.

Runs good so far, i maxed out most settings and disabled better hair quality and motion blur.
Lowest i've seen was 49-51fps.

 

Something is wrong with this game. Sometimes looks bad then on next level looks again much better. For example Lara model. Apart from the outfit she looks like taken from two completely different games. Looks like a part of the game is a conversion from the old Tomb Raider.

Both is very high:

 

Can someone tell me here how much vram this game uses on 1080p everything on very high with SSAA up to 4x after a while ?

Goes it up to max 6gb vram of just stays it below it ?

On 2160p it goes to max, but what about 1080p ?
Does it still reach 6 gb after a while ?

If so i refuse to buy this game because i hate stutters.

I apreciate it of someone makes a video with afterburner so i check them vram on 1080p with everything on very high and SSAA on 4x.

 

Yep its confirmed over 6 gb on 1080p with 4xSSAA.
After 8 min and 40 secs it goes berserk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCft1b6HHDw

 

HBAO+ is bugged atm..

Spoiler

 

i'm waiting for VXAO just to see how it enhances the shadows

 

What is VXAO?

EDIT: Oh nvm found it.

 

what the crap did you expect from 4xSSAA ??

 

Free-camera tool.
https://twitter.com/Hattiwatt1/status/694266778550190080

 

Even metro last light does not exceed this or the first tombraider.
So i expected better for a graphics card over 700 euro, in combination with this game.

I can imagine it goes over 4.5 gb or so, but over 6 gb is just insane on 1080p.

 

You mean those two older games??

4k is not something many card will be able to run without issues, and assuming it's as least 4k without knowing what screen you are using.

Edit: Just noticed you have edited to say 1080p, it's not 1080p, you're running the game at 2160p.

 

How strange, almost every performance review, reports 980 Ti as almost 20 more fps, against every gpu, fury x or 980. My card in theory if i look at 3dmark score, i have a 980 Ti nvidia stock. And i can almost get 65 solid fps, with all ultra, except AA, DOF motion blur, and purehair on very high.

 

Yep thats my point @ 1080p it should run perfect with x2 gtx 980 ti, hell its even faster then a titan x in many many games, the only reason why a titan x performs better here is because it got much more vram, but its allot slower then a gtx 980 ti clockwise and other specs.

Witcher 3 for an examble looks similar graphical wise with tombraider in my opinion and runs like a charm, then again that game is not using SSAA ofcourse, but still SSAA should be better optimized in this title.

I still think its bull**** that this game is using more then 6gb vram on full HD with SSAA up to 4x.

 

It probably does run perfect @ 1080p/full HD.

Your not running the game at 1080p/full HD though, you're running it at 2160p/4k.

 

It doesnt matter other games that are using SSAA like metro last light redux or the first tombraider dont suffer from using so much vram.

 

Yeah, because they are older and the base games were based around last gen consoles and older PC GPU's.

I don't think 6GB is enough vram to guarantee no issues at 4k with every new game.

 

I still think it could be better optimized.

 

Probably, what game couldn't.
It just won't be anywhere near the low levels of vram usage that older games used.