$119999.99 hdtv

At least you can buy that with confidence as it has the "low price guarantee."

 

will it cook for me and have a .01ns response time?

Sarcasim to the extreme, no way in hell anyone sane would pay that

 

In all seriousness, what's the point in this?

A projector would give you a bigger screen AND better picture quality AND you can pull them up and down way way way easier than a fricking teevee that probably weighs several tonnes and would give you a heart attack every time someone walked in front of it...

And it would cost less, not that price is an issue when these sizes are being considered...

 

It's a flagship model, it lifts up the perception of the other models.

A projection screen doesn't look anywhere near as good, at least to me, but I know what you're getting at.

 

Yeah, I guess - but I think I'd rather have a laser projector for the wall which is less than half the cash and says 'FLAGSHIP NAVAL DESTROYER OF WORLDS' like this product does:

http://www.sony.co.uk/pro/product/LSPX-W1S/

 

VERY IMPORTANT!!!
The shorter response time does NOT belong less motion blur but yes lower persistence (=harder flicker) or faster Hz CMR (Samsung) or sub-frame (for plasma) belongs less motion blur.

 

A house for $120k? Damn thats cheap! Where I live the smallest home is close to $500k

 

I think I will stick with my 24" IPS Monitor for now. (Yes I am a cheap bastard)

Also had to make my 1st post somewhere...

 

You don't fancy a $120k TV instead?

Welcome to G3D

 

Well sure I wouldnt mind a sweet screen man, I do however not have enough real estate in my man-cave, neither the cash to spend required for such luxury. (again I am a cheap bastard)

A man can dream though.

On another note, I take a smaller screen, with a higher pixel density over a larger screen any day of the week, but thats me!

Nough said!

Thx alot! :cheers:

 

haha, totally with you on that, who wouldn't want something like this in their massive house lol

I mean, a 50" would look well out of place in a 4 acre home