AMD Catalyst 15.7 WHQL Driver - Download & Discussion

DXDIAG? MS needs to update it. DX12_0 and DX11_1 feature levels are the same if I'm not mistaken. ie DX12_0 is just an API architecture change so it doesn't add any new features. DX12 works on existing cards and drivers so that is all that matters.

 

CC doesn't start. Nice..
Windows 10 here.

 

:funny:

 

why only fps between 55 and 95 :/

 

Yeah same problem here was really hoping that this would add vsr to windows 10 compatible drivers I guess it is back to 15.6. :bang:

 

I've just seen a split second of 140fps in pCARS for the first time ever with Catalyst 15.7s, before dinner I saw 134fps for a split second in 1023.10s (using "low" for essential details, most extras "off" and FXAA "high" for AA).

The 1040s have been de-throned as pCARS champions, for their successor to be usurped in less than 24 hours!

 

Not even contemplating installing this. 34 °C = Intel HD summer time
But paying attention to everyone's feedback.

Anyone has any idea why is AMD in their release notes interchangeably calling this driver 15.7/15.20
http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop?os=Windows+10+-+64

 

With gtx980 dxdiag shows dx12 lvl 12.1, so it was fixed around build 1014*

 

1366 X 768 @ 60Hz
1600 X 900
1920 X 1080
1600 X 900 @ 60Hz
1920 X 10801920 X 1080 @ 60Hz
2560 X 1440
3200 X 1800
3840 X 2160 (AMD Radeon™ R9 285, AMD Radeon™ R9 Fury Series)
1920 X 1200 @ 60Hz
2048 X 1536
2560 X 1600
3840 X 2400 (AMD Radeon™ R9 285, AMD Radeon™ R9 Fury Series)2560 X 1440 @ 60Hz
3200 X 18001920 X 1080 @ 120Hz
1920 X 1200 @ 120Hz
2048 X 1536 @ 120Hz


--------------------------------------------------------------

Another AMD fail....

where is the ultrawide support ?

no 2560x1080p VSR support so that we can get correct aspect ratio formats. when enabling VSR typical amd ......


guess i wont be using VSR and sticking to my custom resolution with CRU.

 

VSR and FRTC are working as they should

 

thank you. I will testing tonight

 

Good Driver it seems and WHQL finally

however, too late AMD i was waiting for a driver like that (promised) for my 270x from decmeber until march. after that i bought my 960 and im very satisfied

waiting for the feedback

 

Honestly this is the single reason I got rid of my R9 290. I loved that card.
Actually more then my 670 sli, but with not 21:9 support for VSR I just couldnt stick with it.


I can have 5120x2160 DSR on my 670 sli which is fantastic for older games.
Max I had with my 290 was 3200x1800. CRU would not do crap for me on newest drivers. I would have been very happy to have 3440x1440 on my R9 290.

 

CRU works fine here now, it never used to.

 

It wouldnt work past Omega drivers for me.
No matter what I did. Getting 4k to work was a b*tch when I had my 25 inch 1080p lcd.

 

Cru?

 

http://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Resolution-Utility-CRU

 

CRU worked fine for me for as long as I can remember; but then again, the only thing I did with it was bump up the refresh rate on my panel(s) (from 60Hz to 75Hz).

 

Thanks

 

The frame rate limiter is there on mine, but i can't see VSR anywhere - its not in any menu at all.