Monolith's Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

Now playing I can tell screenshots don´t make it any justice, textures aren´t sharp but the texturing of the whole scene, the end result is great... you can tell artists have much more room to work on from now on. So I still can´t believe nvidia put the minimum amount of vram they could on the gtx9XX... no room for the future. :bang:

 

i still look for fighting technique tips etc or story talking but nah..all elf language here..there is a MOD section wish TECH section goes for games too. this topic would be clean of this all for sht.

 

Yes performance is great on my 2GB card also. With 1080p Ultra details and HIGH textures, there's no stuttering at all, 50-65fps (my monitor is 16:10, but I can use that resolution thanks to downsampling). If I use FXAA and downsmaple from 1440p, image quality is superb, minimal aliasing, and theres still no stuttering, and very playable fps. I have SDD so maybe that helps ?

But With Ultra textures my performance will drop (30-45fps), and indeed there's stuttering.

 

Thats such BS. At 4k the game only takes 3.8 for me.

 

My monitor's native res of 900p.
Yeah, I know it's not 1080p or a 4K monitor... blah, blah, blah.

Still gives a great picture, while giving me more room performance wise. Plus, I've never been big on really huge monitors.
I had a full 1080p 24 inch one a while back. Didn't like it. Went to my current 900p 20" one and really like how it looks.

 

Bigtime has a point i can't believe it's still elf talk.
game must be crap then.

 

Are mosue/keyboard controls OK?
Gamepad or m/k?

 

It's very mediocre.

 

It'll "use" as much as it has available. check your vram usage when the Nvidia logo comes up, I'm getting 2.1gb there, which of course is nonsense. What the game does is fills up as much vram as it possibly can. That's not to say that those with 3 or 4gb cards can't play just fine with ultra everything.

 

Okay because I am averaging 34 FPS at 4k on ultra via the benchmark. A tad laggy in game but playable and fun as hell!

 

I would rather play at a lower resolution with higher fps.

 

I don't understand why you guys are picking apart a console port.. What did you expect? The hardware is probably 2 yrs behind the pc if not more. These companies don't give a crap about quality anymore. Its all big business now and they just want to push these games out and patch it later. PC is in the back of their mind..

 

I'm using mouse and keyboard, and it's fine. I've had no issues pulling off moves, countering, getting around the world.

All controls are fully remappable, so you can tweak and adjust things to your liking.

 

Thanks for information, i'll probably run game on med- settings with 40fps which is good and I am also using 900p monitor. Maybe I'll play on a TV 38" (768p) if i get used to joystick.

 

No problem. Here's my benchmark from the in game tool...



That's at 900p with all settings at High except for SSAO. I've toyed with tessellation, and it seems to have almost no effect performance wise.

Also, according the my in game FPS counter, my performance in game is higher then the benchmark's "average" score. Normally running mid 70s.

 

Hi, I've disabled the v-sync in the game and I have enabled in the control panel but I still get 60fps and when it falls below is blocked at 30fps, what I have to do to prevent this from happening? I'm seeing people playing 70 or 80fps with 750ti ...

 

Don't use V-Sync or use Nvidia's Adaptive V-Sync.

 

Or use borderless fullscreen.

 

Not me.

 

Okay, ive used the past few hours playing the game, and ultra textures is a no go if i dont want stutter. But 1440p, high textures, and 1.5 ssaa Works decent (although not constant 60 fps).

Its a quite fun game