yeah but if the amd card did run tess it would be a battle. the no tess setting has nothing to do with dx9 benches thuo,the 7980 is just better at them.
here is a screenie for gpu clock on a 680 classified URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/689/33770asfulam03134086cls.jpg/][/URL] more room to go up. Done at 1489 top, 1.4vc and chilled to 3~10c
not good score but try on XP to improve performance. PS: GTX 680 is crap due to probably weak memory bandwidth (it's not faster than GTX 580) and nr of transistor count. See my scores with 3DM06 included running CPU@stock and @OC and GPU@stock only
Ricardo, I didn't post this for a score good or bad. Just to show gpu clock after some mod and do-ability. Performance for another day.
680 is not worth the 03 time for me Messed around with stock cooling 680 card with 148k score but cpu @5.9 7980 is champs in this bench Sucky but no tweaks hope to hit 180k soon:wanker:
@EddieG and @cowie: GTX 680 is (not bit nor little) slower than my GTX 480 at "Pixel Shader 2.0" feature test due to unknow reason (but not memory bandwidth). Win 7 x64 SP1 with i5-2500K@Turbo Boost and GTX 480 296.10WHQL (HQ)
here is a quick run with my little gpu water block installed. I had to make a shim to raise it a couple 1000th's.Then during the test a fan I had on the VRM popped a wire and I didn't notice until I saw 70c in my offboard display.:funny: I pulled it off while it was still running and soldered it and stuck it back on before the test was over!!!
Not bad ed Try setlod beta 6 if you have not already. Man i cant believe they go 220k in this one with vga/cpu on ln2 Ric I dont know why it gets killed there but i wont bother with 680 03 Add the fact when cold with me its a "red screen" affair not fun and crap scores ontop of that.
Just short of 160k single card. 7970 1300/1600 2600k 5.1GHz 159,310 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm03/6490600
My best with this card... so far URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/202/3229aasrocm031777207970.jpg/][/URL]
You know, cowie, I just had the card sitting in there and put those numbers in. I was really testing the cpu for clocks and temps, 4 cores or 8. then I got all hung up with the 'only one ram stick" thing and found it was the cpu causing problems. I'll shoot for efficiency when I have this sorted out. On the rams though, I put 1660mV.
Bro i was doing the same thing just testing cpu and what i could get out of it voltage wise. Whole new animal with ln2 over dice for these chips,mine seems to run better on 4c8c over 2 3 or 4 cores was getting some 6.3 action on my 3570k thuo Good luck with the card i'm sure you will be going 1800+ on the rams in no time