3D Mark 2011 Guru3d Records

Posted this in another thread but here goes :

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/44289

P7318, curious though that my GPUs sit at a constant 66% across all 3 during every test (bar CPU) which I find incredibly strange.

So far my experience with 3DMark 11 is sub-par compatibility wise. Graphics wise the tests look amazing and I particularly enjoy watching the scenic fly throughs.

My first gripe is the fact that I'm only using 2 GPUs worth to render the scene, there seems to be artificial limiting going on here but that's probably a feature of the 'basic' edition.

As you can see I'm not suffering from a CPU bottleneck.



Secondly with eyefinity enabled the whole program gets squashed up to 1/3rd the size of one screen, so I effectively get 1/9th of my whole display setup used by the tests. This is obviously sub-par as you can't really make anything out and basically useless. I had to revert to using a single monitor for the tests by disabling eyefinity. This shows poor fore-thought put into the program by the developers and I've seen it a couple other places before.

Obviously these are caused by my over the top enthusiast system. But isn't this suite for benchmarking a system like mine?

 

P2614 3DMarks

Graphics score 2433
Physics Score 4465
Combined Score 2458
GraphicsTest1 12.45 FPS
GraphicsTest2 11.98 FPS
GraphicsTest3 14.49 FPS
GraphicsTest4 6.89 FPS
PhysicsTest 14.18 FPS
CombinedTest 11.43 FPS

 

P5954 for moi.

 

3DMark Score - P4093
Graphics score - 4104
Physics Score - 4251
Combined Score - 3812
GraphicsTest1 - 22.39 FPS
GraphicsTest2 - 21.12 FPS
GraphicsTest3 - 24.99 FPS
GraphicsTest4 - 10.86 FPS
PhysicsTest - 13.5 FPS
CombinedTest - 17.73 FPS

 

P4311

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/35935

 

P5157

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/50230;jsess...dm11/50230?key=Jwvfmd0wPETSXEeUbZA8k883NbPy3b

 

P6061 on GTX470 900MHz core, 1000 mem
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/30031

basic test is boring and looks kinda bad but is at least short

 

here my score, only cpu is clocked @ 3Ghz
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/53939
3DMark Score P6308
Graphics score 6674
Physics Score 5708
Combined Score 5036
GraphicsTest1 36.48 FPS
GraphicsTest2 34.63 FPS
GraphicsTest3 40.63 FPS
GraphicsTest4 17.56 FPS
PhysicsTest 18.12 FPS
CombinedTest 23.42 FPS

can not test yet with CrossX 5970, neither overclocking GPU,since I have a *$@@@ antec Quattro 1000, without enough power on rail to handle.

 

Core i7 965 at 4.1 GHz, ram at 1600 MT/s, and GTX-480 at 900/1800/2150:

P6551
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/52550

X2111
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/52835

Hoping that SLI is officially supported by the time I toss in two 580 HCs. I'll be keeping the 480 HC in the system for folding/PhysX so I'm hoping for a nice high benchmark. Now I just need you guys/gals to keep off the EVGA site and let me order a couple... I missed the first two batches these past two evenings.

 

Interesting mate - you're pulling in an extra 400 on the physics test, yet I'm running at 3.4.

Time for me to kill some processes I reckon

 

Lol scores for me
All default no OC
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/54877
CPU to 3.8 / GPU 900 Mhz
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/56154
Low scores

 

A little one for Add just wanted to break 9K ..

I7 950 @4.416ghz / 3x2go @1600 6-6-8-6-22 / 2x HD5870 @ 1000/1281

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/56705

3DMark Score: P9053

Graphics score: 9151
Physics Score : 9964
Combined Score: 7437

GraphicsTest1 - 49.65 FPS
GraphicsTest2 - 47.45 FPS
GraphicsTest3 - 55.37 FPS
GraphicsTest4 - 24.24 FPS
PhysicsTest - 31.63 FPS
CombinedTest - 34.59 FPS

CPU look to have little impact, way less when compared with the gains of GPU's speed

will start hunting for 10K then.

 

Overclocked my 5970 to 5870 clocks and scored P7605 3DMarks

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/57324

 

This is weird, I'm getting higher scores by down clocking my cpu from 3.4 to 3.2!?

P5954 at 3.4
P6035 at 3.2 lol

Time to start investigating...

 

I do not understand, how you with the same CPU i7 950 @4,4 and just 2x5870 @1000 can score so much higher than me. I run the test with i7 950 @4,54 and 2x5970@1000 (means 4GPU's @1000) plus a GTX470 and my highest P-Score is just P7514

Guess, not only SLI needs a profile or new driver for this benchmark.

I have the feeling, that ATI should release a new CAP which supports 3DM11 and the results will make more sense.

When you check the X-Scores on Futuremark, there are a lot of really strange results. In this moment the by far fastest System on this planet is a Phenom II X6 1090T on 6 threads @ 4GHz and two 5970's. Aha.. :3eyes:

Before I thought a highly overclocked i7 980x on 12 threads and two 580's or three 480's should score higher!!

Right now my summary would be:
Take a CPU with less threads and older GPU's with less tesselation power and you should have better results.
And of course 2 GPU's should score higher than 4 GPU's at same speed.

Additionally it cannot show GPU and Mem-speed correctly, the compare function fails and I face the same Eyefinity problems as others.
Loading time of Combined test is extreme and the load bar stops too long (thought, I have a system halt!)

Man, this benchmark is not balanced at all. I heard, it was delayed because of making it more bugfree. .. still a long way to go ..

 

I started benching with my cpu @ 3.5 then 3.8 then 3.9 and i didn't get much gain as the cpu went up so this is not like 3dmark06 were you could gain 1000s with cpu overclock this new one needs gpu and lots of it.

 

Sussing my score difference. I'm getting a better score by running my ram faster, but cpu clock lower. Interesting testing for me

 

surely a bug with 4 gpu's, it's why i wait all is fixed before buy an advanced version .... to add i put AF and AA controlled by app (check this )...
( your 470 will not help your score, but can it make bug the bench ?)


EDIT ok i have understand what happend watching in detail your score, it's the Combined test who is bugged as with SLI setup, you have half the score you should have ...
It will be needed to wait FM fix all ( i start to think they have rush the release for be on time with the GTX570 )



-------------------------------------------
Interessant CPU scaling test on Lab501.ro


http://translate.google.ro/translat...tp://lab501.ro/diverse/futuremark-3dmark-2011

 

Wait a minute, that's my system! :3eyes:

Something isn't right, you should be getting higher than mine of P11312 @850mhz.

Edit: Taking a closer look at your scores, you are getting about half my framerate. Try removing the 470 and testing your system to see if that is the problem. I'm getting a feeling that the nvidia drivers might be interfering with the crossfire setup for this benchmark.

 

nice score!