Catalyst 10.3pre (8.71) leaked (Win7/Vista)

This is more appropriate IMO.

 

Sweet baby Jesus!!!!!

Thanks

 

Yeah same here

 

never mind the info box,it happen to everyone ,mine don't even say 9,12 or 10.3
just run some games and see the difference
when this drivers reach official release I doubt they going to make another that boost this much ,perhaps a little bit more

 

Nothing for now. Sorry. Be patient

 

Any word of Stereoscopic 3D in these drivers?

 

Did you write the drivers? Congrats on finding them but come on, after reading this thread it would seem you want your 15 minutes.

 

I think he's gonna get 15+ minutes

Keep up the good work, installing right now and probably happy after installation.

 

not that its overly important..but my WEI went from 7.7 on graphics/desktop to a 6.0 wow. now lets try some games..

Stalker:COP runs at a nice 55+ fps consistently now...full detail w/dx11 @ 1920x1200 hope this continues with the finalized drivers its a HUGE game..and fun!

edit : hmm..strange...I did that 1st test after install/reboot...and now after a 2nd reboot, all is back to 'normal' the 6.0's are back to 7.7's
not that it matters much...hehe but still

 

You have been going to those church meetings you told be me about?

Sweet mother be Jesus more appropriate perhaps?

Just about to try these out btw mines a

 

Try to run the WEI test again

 

Also, try reinstalling your drivers over top of the ones you just installed, then try running wei again.

 

I have never past 6.0 really can't care less what windows say the performance is superb but it tick me that mine old 295 get 7.9 but in vantage only 22k
5970 do 32k wtf:biggun: the WEI run with Phyxs lol

edit -never mind I just run it again on 10.3 and get 7.8,7.8
but still the 295 wins for 0.1 points ,no go

 

15 minutes ? Of what ? Sorry if I don't understand, but I'm a pure man and not aware of many dark things taking place here.

I didn't wrote them (I only coded some OSX x86 X1300 drivers for the girl I love). I'm far from the only one to got them. A guy posted on another thread just 2 minutes after I had them. I thought he would share it before I did, since I have a pretty bad connection, but I had my frickin' low sendspace link up before anyone it seems.
Here is the little story
Sooo, enjoy this golden driver, and don't ask. It's free

And if I'm speaking a superb low end English, it's because I'm a poor french computer technician ! :mhp:

 

Direct link Mirror:

http://vp-zp.com/vp/ATI_Win7_Vista_Catalyst10.3_Preview.zip

 

Amazing scores in Vantage, fastest driver by far. +10 fps in various scenes.

 

Did a compare 10.2/10.3 seems the same to me in gaming alsff to test some more.
Crysis Warhead


FarCry2

 

Here are my vantage scores, pre 10.3 (10.2 the x.703 ones dunno exactly the build nr.) and the 10.3 Drivers

Pre 10.3


10.3 Preview

 

All i can say is. OMG!!! The performance improvement on Mass Effect 2 is huge as say 20 fps more in areas where i never reach 62fps (i had 40)

It is amazing!!!!!! Moar testing needed, but amazing so far!

 

Unreal2oo4,

Do you mind updating to Vantage v1.0.2 1901 released on Feb 10, 2010?
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1756/Futuremark_3DMark_Vantage_v1.0.2_1901.html


gerardfraser,

Take a look at your own results.
1. Crysis Warhead at 1920 using 4xAA
Cat 10.2=97.42 vs Cat 10.WIN =99.77.
Even though the peeks and valleys are the same between cat drivers the overall performance throughout the test improved with Cat 10.WIN. Which is why your average is higher. Also note the play times; Cat 10.WIN has a lower time then Cat 10.2. This is why you really can't look at just max/min frame rates as that's just a snap shot at that given time and not indicative of the entire run. A graph should show higher/more sustained frame rates throughout the run with Cat 10.WIN IMO.

2. FC2 benchmark test is best used if you let it run 3 times (default setting), not once. The results will always be sporadic if you run the test only one time. And, IMO when you do run that test once the results are very unpredictable. Re-run the results again. Per my setup I noticed improvements.