DX 11 benchmark for ATI guys

That is awesome FPS at those settings.

 

benchmarks

in pic left one is 9.8drivers and these 9.10drivers on the right

 

Direct3d10:

Unigine

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:36.9
Scores:929

Direct3d11:

Unigine

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:36.0
Scores:907

DirectX11 doesn't stutter as DirectX10 and feels more smooth even on 20 fps. If I didn't see the 20 fps I would think it was 30+. DX11 stutter free gaming even at low fps....??? I am in...

 

That's true! When I enable AA in DX11 it seems smoother. But it is possible that my eyes fool me

It also seems like that people with a high clocked CPU have better results in DX11, but I could be wrong. Drivers? Microsoft? The engine?
Also, the effects of tesslation are a bit exaggerated. As far as I can see, the geometry is dramaticly tesslated and extruded/displaced. That could be a reason a GPU runs out of juice/hits his limit.

Edit:

@ connos: What settings did you use? I have the idea that due to unknown reasons I am getting lower results than most of the 4870's.

 

The DX 9 test stutters a bit...

FPS: 94.6
Scores: 2382

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
CPU flags: 3511MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.01.01.973 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d9
Mode: 1600x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

The DX 10 test runs smooth...

FPS: 76.0
Scores: 1914

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
CPU flags: 3511MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.01.01.973 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d10
Mode: 1600x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

DX 11 is installed and tessellation has been enabled and is visible (and no stuttering)...

FPS: 49.2
Scores: 1239

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor
CPU flags: 3511MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.01.01.973 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1600x1200 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

 

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:
43.9
Scores:
1106

Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:
Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz
CPU flags:
3399MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 HTT
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 8.16.11.9107 1024Mb
Settings
Render:
direct3d10
Mode:
1440x900 fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
16x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled

 

HD5850 @ 800/1200
CPU down to 250 bus speed because for some reason it's unstable at 300 with these DX11 benchmarks and tech demos



lol, bottleneck i know, i'll be getting a quad either this christmas or january

 

Without AA DX9 is still much faster than DX10 in this benchmark.

 

On my machine DX 9 stutters a bit and DX 10 and DX 11 run smooth, even though DX 9 has a higher frame rate.

 

/delete/

 

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS:
31.9
Scores:
803
Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:
Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
CPU flags:
3013MHz MMX+ 3DNow!+ SSE SSE2 SSE3 HTT
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 8.16.11.9107 1024Mb


Settings
Render:
direct3d10
Mode:
1920x1200 2xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
16x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled

 

Isn't obvious to anyone why dx9 runs on higher fps compared to dx10 and dx11?
I mean it has less fluff innit...

And DX11 runs on lower fps then dx10 b/c they use tesselation to bump the IQ. If they were aiming for equal IQ dx11 would be alot more efficient then dx10 due to how tesselation works, but its a dubble edged sword here, if you go nuts on tesselation you can smooth out textures as never before, wich will lower fps.

This bench is not an accurate comparision of how dx9, 10, and 11 runs fps wise since they do not use to the same 'frames' so to speak. What you can see is how much better dx11 looks and runs (smoothness wise ) compared to dx9, and 10 - but ofc at a fps cost.

Seems alot of people are under the impression dx11 under all circumstances would equal higher fps, wich isn't really the truth and this bench is a perfect example. DX11 is basically a more powerful program with more things to do innit, and thats exactly what you see in this demo - more things innit wich makes the IQ this good, but at the cost of fps. :grad:

 

you're right, the point of implementing tessellation in this benchmark is to show what it can really do.

We'll see once Dirt 2 hits stores, that should be the first DX11 game out right?

 

I've switched off tessellation in DX 11. The performance seems to be equal to DX 10 in that case. Actually the performance is a bit better than DX 10, but nothing to write home about.

 

Yup. In your case you'll probably get it for "free". Your card came with Dirt 2 coupon, didn't it?

 

if you guys want more DX11 goodies to play with (especially those dx11 programs you've seen on youtube), download the directx aug 2009 sdk, there're some small demos that demonstrate tessellation and the like

 

:< mine isn't the Dirt 2 Edition :bang:

 

hey this demo runs smooth on my GTX260 the only thing i haven't got is the tessellation crap thing but thats not enough to make me buy a new graphic card sh!t, don't get me wrong am a big ATI fan its just i don't get the whole dx11 thing when some of the best looking games to date are directx9 still and the idea of me buying two more monitors for gaming ATI pleeeese that aint going to cut it. scores on my current rig are

FPS:47.9
scores:1206
win7 64bit build 7100, every thing stock no over clocks
Nvidia driver 191.07WHQL

 

No, BattleForge has already been patched DX11. It was the first one. They also use it to bump the IQ, gives it slow down for me.

 

Yeah, you are right. I forgot about that one. Must be because I am not a big RTS fan.