DX 11 benchmark for ATI guys

They used it for IQ improvement though. Substantial improvement on all the rocks, all the roofs. If you had put the same effect with dx9 or 10, perhaps it would be significantly slower.

 

If you tried doing the same thing without using tesselation the performance hit would be massive. There is a hit with tesselation enabled, but nowhere near as big as it would otherwise be.

 

a i7 would score fps in the 50s
a 5870 needs a i7 @ 3.6 to have no cpu bottleneck so my old kentfield stock @ 2.93 will hurt my fps in most if not all games and benchmarks

 

My run, DX10 native resolution 1920x1200 8xAA 16xAF all enabled / high



For me it's scales like a charm, cats 9.8

 

This is a very good benchmark imo.Puts 3dmark to shame.

 

yep, it is a full 3d environment (heck, you can even move around in there) than just a rendering engine.
It's most like a game engine itself....

 

only how referecen

Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

vista 64 sp2
xfx geforce 275, core 2 quad 2.6 8 gigas in ram ddr2
dx9 1680x1050 0xAA fullscreen Fps:47.9 ; 1205
dx9 1680x1050 4xAA fullscreen Fps:37.7 ; 951
dx9 1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen Fps:?? ; ?? testing
dx10 1680x1050 0xAA fullscreen Fps:45.1 ; 1136
dx10 1680x1050 4xAA fullscreen Fps:34.5 ; 870
dx10 1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen Fps:20.9 ; 527

opengl 1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen Fps:18.5 ; 465

 

yeah i guess you're right..it looked very good from the video, even the little hose on that metal thing had tessellation on it.

 

I can understand that but regardless of how the tessellation is being done its causing a near 50% performance penalty via hardware. I assumed this was going to happen and I am sure when the 2nd gen DX11 cards are released performance will be adequate for all that eye candy. Tessellation definitely isn't "free".

 

Did you find a way to set the res in 2560x1600 in Heaven Demo ?

Also possible to change the resolution of the AMD tech demo ???

 

WHY is that that DX9 is MUCH faster in this benchmark than DX10?
Unigine benchmarks were never reliable.

edit: it seems aa in dx9 does not look as good as in dx10. looks like dx10 uses transparent aa for vegetation too while dx9 does not.

 

IDK, but looking at everyone else, this isn't half bad.

--------

Unigine

Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS: 56.1
Scores: 1414

Hardware

Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows 7 (build 7100, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
CPU flags: 3399MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 8.670.0.0 512Mb

Settings

Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1280x1024 fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

Unigine Corp. © 2005-2009

 

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS:
24.0
Scores:
605

Hardware
Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
CPU flags:2999MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 HTT
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 8.16.11.9156 896Mb

Settings
Render:direct3d11
Mode:1360x768 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2009

 

My results: Windows7x64, E8400@ 4.3, 2x 4890's @ 950/ 1100

Everything on high, 1920x 1080 8xAA

avg fps: 42.1
score: 1061

same thing no AA, res 1024x768

avg fps: 119.2
score: 3002


No process's killed, internet security up and running

 

Yes this game/demo seems to scale very very good! it comes to my mind that ati gave 58xxx cards to work on the engine

 

your cpu is killing the performance of that 260

 

Single HD 5870 1K GPU

1920x1200 DX10 default filtering
64.9 FPS/Score 1635
http://img197.imageshack.us/i/heavendx10.jpg/

1920x1200 DX11 default filtering
41 FPS/Score 1032.
http://img27.imageshack.us/i/heaven11.jpg/

 

edit

 

I keep getting an error indicating that I am missing an extension to run this benchmark.. how do I fix it?

I have ATi 5870 1 GB DDR5 from XFX and Win 7 Home x64, any ideas?

 

Not too bad :

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0

FPS: 64.3
Scores: 1620

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
CPU flags: 4095MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.670.0.0 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1024x768 fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled