3D Mark 2006 Guru3d Records

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by compgeek89, Apr 22, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macdaddy

    macdaddy Guest

    Messages:
    2,400
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    TITAN X
    HAHAHA i was looking and thought WTH .... then checked the link no wonder.
     
  2. Luis_GT

    Luis_GT Guest

    Messages:
    1,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    XFX R9 290X
  3. northy84

    northy84 Master Guru

    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    sapphire 6970 stock atm
  4. Luis_GT

    Luis_GT Guest

    Messages:
    1,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    XFX R9 290X
    4.23Ghz... ORB says 4.7 cause the Q6700 has a 10x multi but I set it to 9x and bumped the FSB to 470
     

  5. northy84

    northy84 Master Guru

    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    sapphire 6970 stock atm
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2009
  6. aleslammer

    aleslammer Member Guru

    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Not Sure
  7. Blaise

    Blaise Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    ASUS TUF 4090 OC
    [hwbot] 25819 i920 @4.25GHz, GTX 260 x 2 @710/1550/1225 [/hwbot]

    25819 ORB compare link
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2009
  8. jaggerwild

    jaggerwild Master Guru

    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    378
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 2070 SUP
  9. Tat3

    Tat3 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,863
    Likes Received:
    238
    GPU:
    RTX 4070 Ti Super
    [hwbot] 27201 i7 920 d0 @ 4.30GHz NH-U12P SE1366 - 2*Sparkle GTX285 669/1524/1279[/hwbot]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2009
  10. EddieG

    EddieG Master Guru

    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    A few

  11. death_samurai

    death_samurai Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Palit 970 GTX jetstream
  12. jaggerwild

    jaggerwild Master Guru

    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    378
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 2070 SUP

    They go higher with Rivatuner !:nerd: Thats just the highest CCC will allow.
     
  13. Bodar

    Bodar Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Lots of Fermi'zzzz
  14. Bodar

    Bodar Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Lots of Fermi'zzzz
    Looks Like it's number 8 for me.. I need more juice! :) If I had the new phase change unit or dry ice or LN2.. Would be fun!!
     
  15. death_samurai

    death_samurai Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Palit 970 GTX jetstream
    Hi care to share what brand of x2's you own?

    What's the highest speed u can get and mem speed too.
     

  16. glenboy

    glenboy Guest

    Messages:
    1,182
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2 x 5850's for now
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2009
  17. DSK

    DSK Banned

    Messages:
    17,914
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    HD5770/BenQ G2220HD
    [hwbot] 12708 - 8800GS 384MB @ 700 core|1750 shader|850 memory - i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz [/hwbot]

    [​IMG]
     
  18. death_samurai

    death_samurai Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Palit 970 GTX jetstream
  19. jaggerwild

    jaggerwild Master Guru

    Messages:
    940
    Likes Received:
    378
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 2070 SUP
    I forget exactly, had them past 950/1022. It is a lot higher as I had two water blocks for them, nickel plated E/K'S. I never jotted them down, I would just lock it into rivatuner. So when it boots it will auto clock the GPU'S up to where I need them to be.

    One is a Sapphire 4870 X2 the other I for get the name though the card says Radeon Chieftech?
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2009
  20. death_samurai

    death_samurai Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,824
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Palit 970 GTX jetstream


    Damn ur rig must be HUGE to fit in 2 water blocks along with 2 x2.

    I assume they would be normal x2 and not Overclocked versions?


    Why didn't u run the test on them at 950?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page