3D Mark 2006 Guru3d Records

Squeezed out a few more...

[hwbot] 20209 - GTX 280 750/1566/1260 - Q9650 @ 4.05Ghz - Air [/hwbot]


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9928505

Soon as my water cooling setup gets here Monday...look out

 

Creeping up

[hwbot] 20397 - GTX 280 756/1566/1269 - Q9650 @ 4.11Ghz - Air [/hwbot]


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9944189

GPU voltage tuner @ 1275mv

 

Updated my rig

Swapped out a few pieces of hardware. Everything is stock default for now. Love the Cooler Master HAF 932 case.

21,173

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9993742

 

[hwbot] 19021 - Intel Quad E8400 @ 4 Ghz Air Cooled - 2 x ASUS 4850 MATRIX @ 750/1058 [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10015315

 

26,013

3.99GHz (21 x 190)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9998270

Update:

Disabled HT in bios and gained another 200MHz from 3.9GHz to 4.1GHz. GPU gained alittle and CPU lost a little.

New score:

26,408

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10020744

 

I just scored 25978 with my sli 9800gtx's. should have waited for 26000 but am in the middle of moving and dont have much time right now.

 

20,961



Compare Link

 

21,020

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10061377

 

Installed 3DM06 on my RAM drive and got 21,020 then it crashed as I was doing a screen grab

Rebooted and re-ran and got 21,557



Managed the screen grab but again crashed my system when I tried to upload the score

 

23832

 

[hwbot] 20,343 - gtx285 @756 q9550 @3.83 [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10253907

Gotta figure out how to get my sys mem to tighter timings. My XP on this Gigabyte board is having a time getting started though. Maybe I'll go for the2oz. copper board. They're getting cheaper USD140. Definately need to cool down that MCH.:bang:

Edit : Got the 2oz. board...love it !

 

Mark 06 score: 19,418
sm2 8803
sm3 10149
cpu 3842

E8400 @ 4.275ghz 1.38v
500 x 9
2000 fsb
BFG 9800gtx+ SLi 803/1154 100%fan

http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=10059539&resultType=14

 

[hwbot] 20274 - HD4870 @ 775/950 - phenom 940 @ 3553MHz - Air [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10012086

 

Hey guys,

I'm a little concerned about the score of my system at stock speeds.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10082320

Is that to be expected? Absolutely nothing was over-clocked for that score. I think that a score of 14,568 is on the slow and low side of things, no? But if I over-clock the CPU @ 3.75 and RAM @ 1Ghz (and leave the GPU at stock) then it suddenly jumps to 17,374, is that also "alright"?

Thanks.

EDIT: After some verification it looks like everything is fine. I've also looked at the public Futuremark ORB's database (via benchmarks research) and all the systems I found that had the exact same hardware also performed within the same limits at corresponding frequencies, and usually the best result came when OC'ing the CPU and RAM rather than the card itself, and my score of 17,374 given the frequencies and hardware in question is apparently fine and to be expected. So never mind this post guys.

 

northy84, Nice Score, that 4870 & 940 get along real well.

 

i was amazed when i stole my room mates 4870x2 and put it in with my 4870.

lol 3GB texture memory.. oh they were all stock except for CPU overclock. once i get a 4870x2 of my own i will overclock the three GPU's.

 

Best score for me with this aging 8800 :banana:

 

Have you tried unlinking your ram and cpu. And just overclock the cpu.

My score beats yours by just a bit. with CPU oc'd to 4.2, ram at 800MHz, and a GTX260 216 with 13% oc.

http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=10082320&compareResultType=14

 

[hwbot] 17311 - HD4870 @ 800/900 - Intel QX9650 @ 4105MHz - Water [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10142006

 

[hwbot] 21954 - 2x GTX 285 FTW - Q9650 @ 4105MHz [/hwbot]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=10155892