this guy has the saddest score ever

**this guy has the saddest score ever -** 02-07-2003, 00:05 | posts: n/a

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=4519737

get a new card man lol

Treblig · 02-07-2003, 04:15 | posts: 3,265 | Location: Mesa , AZ .

UMMMMMM , Uhhhhhhhhhhh , hmmmmmmmmm ..... LOL . That is the lowest I have ever seen . Amazing it even made it through the test ! Interesting find .

02-07-2003, 07:40 | posts: n/a

Is that possible? I thought those Kyro II cards were semi-respectable..

Joshua · 02-07-2003, 08:39 | posts: 6,830 | Location: Seattle, WA

They weren't bad. But they had no support for Hardware T&L. It was all software based.

Aropredator · 02-07-2003, 08:59 | posts: 1,934 | Location: Malaysia

LOL, only 27. Even older card like TNT2 manage to score 800-1000 range.

Reality|Bites · 02-07-2003, 15:39 | posts: 5,038 | Location: Scotland

not much better than my score :/

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5867652

02-07-2003, 15:52 | posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally posted by Milenko
They weren't bad. But they had no support for Hardware T&L. It was all software based.

Ahh..well..that explains a lot..

Treblig · 02-08-2003, 05:46 | posts: 3,265 | Location: Mesa , AZ .

Hell , I think most onboard Video would do better than that ! I am gonna bench my wifes Gateway ! LOL . Onboard 520 chipset I think with 7Mb memory ..... LOL .

02-10-2003, 12:44 | posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally posted by Junk
Ahh..well..that explains a lot..

but I tought that didn't explain lot enough about the 27 marks
I mean, even a S3 Virge DX 8 Mb can run the bench and get 100+3DMarks, and Virge cards don't have hardware tnl moreover it does not support AGP tex. & Direct3D acceleration
LOL 0.1 Fps in dragothic... I guess he is turning AGP texture accel., Direct3D accel. and Hardware accel. all OFF !!!
mwhahaahah, geezz... he must be quite insane to do that

02-10-2003, 15:09 | posts: n/a

Probably running at 2x AGP also..

soopersonic · 02-17-2003, 13:52 | posts: 3,416

Thought it was PCI because it says "Not available" @ "AGP speed current / available"

soopersonic

**hmm sumthing werong there -** 02-17-2003, 23:44 | posts: n/a

my dad has a Asus terminator system:

ASUS mobo
Celeron 1.4ghz
512mb sdram pc133
40gb hdd
win xp
+ a PCI inndo3d Gf2 mx400
i benchmarked it and got 2967
which is quite repectable seen as it has a 150w psu
didnt support nature or polygon(dual)
but T&l worked
one thing bout your m8s pc its Compaq (never trust ****y pc compaines)

soopersonic · 02-18-2003, 14:00 | posts: 3,416

yeah that score is really quite respectable for your dad's rag...
AND you are right: Never let someone build your PC for you, always buy every part on your own!

soopersonic

pitydafoo · 02-18-2003, 18:11 | posts: 2,142 | Location: Tennessee, USA

Quote:

Originally posted by KorganoS
I mean, even a S3 Virge DX 8 Mb can run the bench and get 100+3DMarks

Err... Doesn't 3DMark2K1 require 16MB vram to run? I wanted to run it on an old 8MB Savage4 card, but it wouldn't let me.

soopersonic · 02-18-2003, 21:20 | posts: 3,416

well perhaps that score is hacked or the 3dmark 2001 version is hacked somehow -.-

soopersonic

cloudman · 02-20-2003, 18:53 | posts: 1,406 | Location: san diego

He's trying to break 30 as we speak

soopersonic · 02-20-2003, 18:57 | posts: 3,416

wow that's high level tuning