It appears that the next Call of Duty game, that is being developed by Sledgehammer Games, will be called Call of Duty: WWII. From what we know, Sledgehammer will bring Call of Duty back to its roots,... Call of Duty: WWII Leaked Online
I knew they would do this, i said after infinate warfare they will go back and im right again EDIT .. oh Hilbert I am afraid you were well beaten on this http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=413528
After the massive failure that was infinite warfare, they're trying to copy battlefield 1: good look on that.
When Hilbert confirms interesting/leak threads started here as being genuine, he posts them on the front page news, nothing to do with being beaten
Last one was in space so i thought we gonna fight some aliens in the next one. I guess we can go back to WW2 as well.
Flame throwers, M-1 Garand's, mortars, Tommy guns, M-10 Tank Destroyer, King Tiger tanks, Mustangs, Me109's, B-17's, Naval artillery, German (zz) troops, artillery, .........Nah this is an obvious loser:wanker:
Sledgehammer was the same studio that made MW3 and Advanced Warfare...Which MW3 was okay, but Advanced Warfare was freaking terrible. Don't have high hopes for this one, and I don't anyway because it's a new COD game.
Beating the dead horse eh... COD just keeps coming back. Modern Warfare was the last one I played, and enjoyed
Hopefully this will be a good one. No wall running flying around the map junk. Wishful thinking for them to make a new engine, and have dedicated server hosting instead of client side. Butttttttttttt we know how COD's roll out every year, with the same ol junk.
It would be nice if they had game option in single player mode that you could fight WW2 with modern weapons (tanks too) against the axis WW2 weapons to see how modern weapons compare with those now ancient weapons.
Im not surprised as call of duty is really getting hit hard by battlefield. Ive been waiting for this game since call of duty 5 world at war. If they go with matchmaking its going to fail. They need to go back to full dedicated servers and not the strong armed servers we got with black ops 1.
I'm a sucker for historical combat. World War 2 is the greatest setting for a shooter game, in my opinion. The weapons had advanced much farther than World War 1 and the theatre in WW2 was much more vast. I think the skill and tactical gameplay is more satisfying in WW2 games than it is in modern/future warfare with all the dumbfire weaponry. I also like the diversity in locations/settings a WW2 game can offer, all with historical significance. I just love a good ww2 shooter. Hope this is solid.
Well you'd be a fool if you didn't seen this coming. Call of Duty 1 up to 3 was fun even though COD 3 was only on Consoles and glitched as ****. I remember camping under a house in Eder Dam i think the map was just sniping people as they passed by haha, so many long nights playing that game. Cod 4 Modern Ware was fun MW2 was meh for me and everything after that i just didn't give a **** about because i didn't like playing with these foul mouth mother****ing kids. What's interests me is when they release a new Battlefield game not this year, pretty sure i read they were taking a break from making a Battlefield game "EVERY" freaking year, will they counter attack with a new Battlefield 2142 game like 2143 or something similar? Maybe? If Titan Fall doesn't release Titan Fall 3 which will end up looking to much like the same game, Battlefield 1 stood out cause every other top selling game was fighting in space or looked futuristic. I wouldn't be surprise if they went the futuristic space shooter route.