Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > General Chat > Frontpage news
Frontpage news Perhaps you have some news to report or want to check out the latest Guru3D headlines and comment ? Check it in here.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks shows 50% faster than Core i5 7600K
Old
  (#1)
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
 
Hilbert Hagedoorn's Avatar
 
Videocard: AMD | NVIDIA
Processor: Core i7 5960K
Mainboard: X99
Memory: 16GB
Soundcard: X-Fi - GigaWorks 7.1
PSU: 1200 Watt
Default 6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks shows 50% faster than Core i5 7600K - 02-17-2017, 14:52 | posts: 27,739 | Location: Guru3D testlab

The AMD Ryzen leaks and madness doesn't stop. Today some CPU-Z benchmark results have surfeced of what seems to be a six-core*Ryzen 5 1600X processor. The 6 core and 12 threaded processor would have...

6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks shows 50% faster then Core i5 7600K
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#2)
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 1070 SC
Processor: 2600k@4.8 w/ NH-D15S
Mainboard: P8Z77-V
Memory: G-Skills ddr3 16GB@1866
Soundcard: SoundBlaster Z
PSU: TX850
Default 02-17-2017, 14:56 | posts: 7,552 | Location: FLA,USA

Now this is nice to see. Can't wait to see a full review from you boss.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 02-17-2017, 15:03 | posts: 9,132 | Location: Serbia, NS

Massive increase in single threaded performance compared to FX CPUs. This is looking good indeed.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Zeka
Newbie
 
Zeka's Avatar
 
Videocard: PowerColor R9 280 3GB
Processor: i5 4690K
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z97-UD3H
Memory: Kingston 1866 DDR3 8GB
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair vx 550W
Default 02-17-2017, 15:05 | posts: 32

These 6 core Ryzen cpus will be a huge hit. As soon as they hit the market, I'll be putting my current rig up for sale. I need something with more cores/threads
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#5)
Silva
Newbie
 
Silva's Avatar
 
Videocard: Asus R9 270X
Processor: Intel i5 2500K
Mainboard: Asus P8Z68 V-Pro
Memory: G-Skill Sniper 4x4096Mb
Soundcard: Logitech Z5500
PSU: Nox Urano VX 650W
Default 02-17-2017, 15:08 | posts: 37 | Location: Portugal

Holy crap!

In comparison my i5 2500k @ 4Ghz is getting me 1516 Single Thread Score and 3915 Multi Thread Score...Zen really brought back my need for a new CPU.

Last edited by Silva; 02-17-2017 at 15:10.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
eclap
Ancient Guru
 
eclap's Avatar
 
Videocard: Zotac AMP! 980ti
Processor: i5 2500k @4.5 1.2v
Mainboard: Asus P8Z77-V Pro
Memory: 16GB GSkill RipjawsX 1600
Soundcard: AuneT1/AD700/DT880/HD650
PSU: XFX Black 750W 80+ Gold
Default 02-17-2017, 15:12 | posts: 31,122 | Location: Hampshire, UK

Interesting. If this is anywhere near true, I'll be buying the 1700/x.

Could this be the "new Sandy Bridge" cpu?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Spartan
Master Guru
 
Spartan's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 290 PCS+
Processor: i5 4690K @ 4.2Ghz / H80i
Mainboard: ASUS Z97-PRO GAMER
Memory: 2x8GB HyperXFury 2133Mhz
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair CS750M
Default 02-17-2017, 15:18 | posts: 651 | Location: United Kingdom

Finally IPC, looks good.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Anarion
Ancient Guru
 
Anarion's Avatar
 
Videocard: EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 ACX
Processor: Intel Core i7 3770K
Mainboard: ASUS P8Z77-V
Memory: G.SKILL RipjawsX 16 GB
Soundcard: Sound Blaster Zx + HD 595
PSU: Corsair AX760
Default 02-17-2017, 15:28 | posts: 12,706 | Location: Finland

I get ~1900 single threaded score with 3770K @ 4,4 GHz so this looks really promising if true.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Laci
Member Guru
 
Laci's Avatar
 
Videocard: Gigabyte GTX 970 G1
Processor: i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz/NH-D14
Mainboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Memory: 16GB Kingston DDR3
Soundcard: Asus Xonar DX/Logi Z906
PSU: Chieftec BPS 950
Default 02-17-2017, 15:33 | posts: 85 | Location: Belgrade, Serbia

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silva View Post
Holy crap!

In comparison my i5 2500k @ 4Ghz is getting me 1516 Single Thread Score and 3915 Multi Thread Score...Zen really brought back my need for a new CPU.

1739 and 6667 here, i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
chispy
Ancient Guru
 
chispy's Avatar
 
Videocard: eVGA GTX1070 SC @ EK H2O
Processor: Ryzen R7 1800x incoming..
Mainboard: Asus CH x370 incoming...
Memory: incoming ...
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium HD
PSU: incoming ...
Default 02-17-2017, 15:42 | posts: 7,476 | Location: In Paradise :)

Awesome performance on single treaded and multitreaded applications , massive increased in ipc performance across the board ! Ryzen will give Intel a good fight with much , much lower price. Let the war on performance / price ratio begin !
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 02-17-2017, 15:46 | posts: 9,132 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laci View Post
1739 and 6667 here, i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz
We can finally upgrade Sandy Bridge without getting another quad-core.

   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
H83
Maha Guru
 
H83's Avatar
 
Videocard: MSI GTX970 Gaming 4G
Processor: Q9550 @ 4.0Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE
Memory: G. Skill 4G DDR2 @1130MHz
Soundcard: Sound Blaster SB Audigy
PSU: Corsair TX 850W V2
Default 02-17-2017, 15:49 | posts: 1,631 | Location: Mars

So the the 7600K is 13% faster in single threaded benches and then it looses in multi threaded by 50% to the 1600X because of the core differences.

If you take the speed advantage of the 7600k then it means that Ryzen offers 90% in single thread performance. Very nice numbers to AMD if my math is correct. Please guys, verify my math!

If AMD releases this soon i might pick one otherwise im gonna buy a 7600K...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
justdoge
Newbie
 
Videocard: GTX960 custom bios
Processor: i5-6600K @4,5
Mainboard: Asus Z170K
Memory: 8GB
Soundcard: Xonar DX / Logitech x540
PSU: bequiet 1kW
Default 02-17-2017, 15:55 | posts: 24

2286 / 8930
6600k@4,5
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Only Intruder
Master Guru
 
Only Intruder's Avatar
 
Videocard: Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
Processor: i5 4690K
Mainboard: Z97P-D3
Memory: 16GB HyperX Savage
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi FPS
PSU: EVGA 750 GQ
Default 02-17-2017, 15:55 | posts: 658 | Location: UK

4690k at standard clocks here score 1770 and 6850

If Ryzen is going to deliver what we're seeing here, this is definitely going to shake things up!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 1070 SC
Processor: 2600k@4.8 w/ NH-D15S
Mainboard: P8Z77-V
Memory: G-Skills ddr3 16GB@1866
Soundcard: SoundBlaster Z
PSU: TX850
Default 02-17-2017, 15:59 | posts: 7,552 | Location: FLA,USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by H83 View Post
So the the 7600K is 13% faster in single threaded benches and then it looses in multi threaded by 50% to the 1600X because of the core differences.

If you take the speed advantage of the 7600k then it means that Ryzen offers 90% in single thread performance. Very nice numbers to AMD if my math is correct. Please guys, verify my math!

If AMD releases this soon i might pick one otherwise im gonna buy a 7600K...
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#16)
Quicks
Master Guru
 
Quicks's Avatar
 
Videocard: RX 470 / 4GB
Processor: 2500K @ 4.5GHZ
Mainboard: ASUS P8P67
Memory: KINGSTON HYPER X 1600
Soundcard: SB Xtremegamer
PSU: APFC 700W HUNTKEY
Default 02-17-2017, 16:12 | posts: 489 | Location: South Africa

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laci View Post
1739 and 6667 here, i5 2500K @ 4.6 GHz
Stange I get 1706 single and multi 5712, 2500K @4.5, single seems right. but my multi thread almost 1000 less? Maybe you got a much beter motherboard or something does ram frequency count in this? doubt is somehow.

Any case makes me want to upgrade again but money is so tight, and I see prices of ram has gone up quickly as well, will need to upgrade everything.

Well done to AMD, hope they make a comeback as they really do need it. This will benefit everybody.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
buhehe
Member Guru
 
Videocard: R9 290 Tri-X Vapor-X
Processor: 4690K
Mainboard: Asus Ranger Z97
Memory: Corsair 16GB @1600
Soundcard:
PSU: CoolerMaster V700
Default 02-17-2017, 16:12 | posts: 59

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loophole35 View Post
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
Exactly, the frequency ratio seems to be the same as in their performance

4.2 / 3.7 = 1.1351
2135 / 1888 = 1.1308

--> same IPC.

**IF** Ryzen overclocks well it's gonna be the obvious top choice for the same $$$
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
Prince Valiant
Master Guru
 
Prince Valiant's Avatar
 
Videocard: GB GTX980 G1
Processor: i5 4670k
Mainboard: ASRock Z87 Ex.4
Memory: 8GB Corsair Veng.
Soundcard: Essence ST/HD800S
PSU: Corsair HX650
Default 02-17-2017, 16:19 | posts: 344

Quote:
Originally Posted by eclap View Post
Interesting. If this is anywhere near true, I'll be buying the 1700/x.

Could this be the "new Sandy Bridge" cpu?
Things are looking good if this and the supposed US price points are true. If it takes to OCing and has decent temps I think that would be a fair assessment .
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 02-17-2017, 16:24 | posts: 9,132 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicks View Post
Stange I get 1706 single and multi 5712, 2500K @4.5, single seems right. but my multi thread almost 1000 less? Maybe you got a much beter motherboard or something does ram frequency count in this? doubt is somehow.
Actually it does. As you can see above i got almost 7,000 with 2133mhz ram and slightly higher clocks. This only apply for multi but not single threaded.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
PrMinisterGR
Ancient Guru
 
PrMinisterGR's Avatar
 
Videocard: Sapphire 7970 Quadrobake
Processor: Core i7 2600k@4.5GHz
Mainboard: Sapphire Pure Black P67
Memory: Corsair Vengeance 16GB
Soundcard: ASUS Xonar D2X
PSU: EVGA SuperNova 750 G2
Default 02-17-2017, 16:31 | posts: 5,949

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loophole35 View Post
Keep in mind the speed difference Ryzen at 3.7 7600k at 4.2.
That would make the Ryzen system to actually have higher IPC
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
Pestul
Member Guru
 
Videocard: Zotac 970
Processor: Core i7 920 @4.2GHz
Mainboard: ASUS P6T SE
Memory: 12GB DDR3
Soundcard:
PSU: Antec TP 750
Default 02-17-2017, 16:31 | posts: 88

Quote:
Originally Posted by buhehe View Post
Exactly, the frequency ratio seems to be the same as in their performance

4.2 / 3.7 = 1.1351
2135 / 1888 = 1.1308

--> same IPC.

**IF** Ryzen overclocks well it's gonna be the obvious top choice for the same $$$
Early reaction to overclocks achieved with Ryzen.



I can't wait!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
DARKSF
Newbie
 
Videocard:
Processor:
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU:
Default 02-17-2017, 16:35 | posts: 21

Well actually the correct way should be to calculate the points per MHz te get proper picture on IPC

So for Ryzen 1888/3700=0.51027
for @Anarion 3770K 1900/4400 = 0.43181
for @Laci 2500K 1739/4600 = 0.37804
for @justdoge 6600K 2286/4500= 0.508
for @Only Intruder 4690K 1770/3900=0.45384
for @Warrax 2600K 1706/4500 = 0.37911
for @EL1TE 4670K 1909/4200 = 0.45452

which means that if all is scalling in linear fashion with clock on this bench the results will look like this if all the CPUs were runing at 4GHz

Ryzen 4000*0.51027 = 2041
6600K 4000*0.508 = 2032
4670K 4000*0.45452 = 1818
4690K 4000*0.45384 = 1815
3770K 4000*0.43181 = 1727
2600K 4000*0.37911 = 1516
2500K 4000*0.37804 = 1512

Can someone of you guys clock to 4.0GHz to test this math ?

Last edited by DARKSF; 02-17-2017 at 17:02.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
waltc3
Master Guru
 
waltc3's Avatar
 
Videocard: 1.1/6 GHz MSI R9 380 4GB
Processor: FX-8320E
Mainboard: MSI 970 Gaming
Memory: 16 GB (4x4) 2133 HyperX
Soundcard: RealTek 1150
PSU: Corsair 750W CXM
Default 02-17-2017, 16:36 | posts: 339 | Location: Mars

Have no idea whether this thread concerns literal information, of course, but what surprises me is why AMD upsetting the Intel apple cart should surprise anyone. AMD shutout & shut down Intel several years back with the A64--just blew the doors of poor ol' Intel's plans... It was even more surprising when it happened then, because no one else had managed such a feat. Indeed, Only AMD alone among all of the would-be Intel cpu competitor companies lived to survive and prosper. Intel has a nasty habit of eradicating competition through whatever means possible. AMD alone thus far is the only competitor to survive and best Intel in terms of technology and marketable products.

In its "response" to A64, aside from paying retailers not to sell AMD cpus and threatening motherboard manufacturers who might dare to make and sell Intel competitor products, Intel cancelled the original Pentium architecture and went back to the drawing board only to come up with Core/2--made possible *only* because of a cross-license deal with AMD whereupon Intel obtained x86-64, the foundation for Core 2 and all else that has come after from Intel (Today's "Pentium" is not the actual Pentium architecture--it's merely another offshoot of Core2.)

But what Intel wanted to do was to put the world on Itanium, and run the world's ram from Rdram. Rdram was many times costlier than DDR SDRAM, and going with Itanium--the only way Intel wanted to do 64-bits at all--would have meant dumping *all* of your x86 hardware & software..! Starting over from ground 0! Intel's vision, of course, was horrible--at least from the consumer's point of view. I'm sure the Itanium future looked very bright from Intel's corporate view, however... Thank goodness for AMD arriving like the proverbial calvary...!

If AMD did it once I see no reason to think that AMD cannot do it a second time. I *hope* this is a case of AMD wanting *maximum impact*--people expecting less but getting a lot more at release time. The original Athlon was a complete surprise--and a delightful one. We shall see in a few days. And then it will be possible for people to see just how badly Intel has been gouging them over the last few years... We will also get to see what Intel's been hiding in reserve for a day like this--if anything at all.

Last edited by waltc3; 02-17-2017 at 16:46.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
Warrax
Member Guru
 
Videocard: Gigabyte 970 G1
Processor: i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz 1.33v
Mainboard: P8Z77-V PRO
Memory: G.Skill 1866 16GB
Soundcard: Creative SB X-Fi
PSU: Silverstone ST75F-P 750w
Default 02-17-2017, 16:40 | posts: 59 | Location: Canada

This is the kind of benchmark I've been looking for months! CPU-Z benchmark is a good reference in my opinion and it's quick and easy to use.

Bench results are very impressive, about the same IPC and higher Multithread performance. This mean one thing: it will be all about MHZ. So if Ryzen overclock well, it will be a winner for everyone.

Now I wonder if 5+ghz as the norm will be a thing, because Intel might push it that far if competition is fierce.

My results (2600k @ 4.5ghz):
ST: 1706
MT: 7095

Last edited by Warrax; 02-17-2017 at 16:42.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
Tuukka
Newbie
 
Tuukka's Avatar
 
Videocard: Asus GTX660 OC 2 GB
Processor: Intel i7 3770K @ 4,5GHz
Mainboard: Asus P8Z77-V
Memory: Kingston HyperX 16GB
Soundcard: RealTek HD Logitech z5500
PSU: Corsair TX850
Default 02-17-2017, 16:40 | posts: 31 | Location: Finland

Competition that's what we (consumers) need
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2014, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.