Hello everyone and gurus first i am fan of nvidia and intel many years , just i want tray something new ,i am planning build new full AMD system i want ur opinion about this spec : MB : Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z CPU: FX 9950 Black Edition RAM : Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-2400 Memory GPU : Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB Video Card PSU : Cooler Master V850 850W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Sound Card : Asus Xonar Phoebus and Question for CPU it is good stick with standard water Cooler or replaced with corsair water cooler ?
Your current system is better than what you're planning to build.... You'd be better off just upgrading your graphics card in the current system.
dont worry i am not leaving intel this is my current system CPU : I7 3820 @ 3.6 CPU FAN Cooler : thermaltek Frio Advanced 29-31 idle, 42-51 heavy load depend my room temp MB : Saber faulty new one : rampage black edition RAM : upgraded to : corsair 16 GB 1866 PSU : OCZ GameXtreme 1010W Sound Card : creative zxr + sennheiser 650HD+ creative gigaworks s750 case : coolermaster haf X ======== this system i want build it just for test amd like my alt system not primary this will be my new system with dual titan x
That would be a bit back to front wouldn't it? At such time it would make better send being AMD Zen + AMD GPU (on 14nm/16nm). There has been suggestion that a 4 true core APU Zen + AMD Discrete card may give better performance than a CPU+discrete alone, due to load balancing. Alternatively you could get an 8 core (16 thread) Zen + AMD discrete. By that time the Titan X will be grossly outdated anyway. Basically any current card will be 'outdated' once the 14 nm/16 nm cards come out!
amd fan here, dont buy that crazy global warmer. wtf was amd thinking then they created a 200w chip??? if you want to play with amd, check out some of the new fm2+ chips, they make cool toys
I dont think it makes sence to drop over $200 dollars on a 9590, I had the Fx 9370 for some time with formula- z board, at that price point Intel just dominates. Amd for mid to low and Intel obviously for high-end/. My current build for my daughter-A10 7870k Godvari,Gigabyte a88x up4,Corsair ax 760 psu....For the price her system is turning out to be not only better looking then mine but will perform better as well.
I dont see how people can say that, Amd cpus offer an alternative to Intel insane prices! Sure intel is faster but for the money saved I think they are well worth it and have there place in the community.That is just your opinion nothing else/
Now this is some funny stuff! No kidding I had a Fx 9370 that thing ran HOTT~ and pulled a lot of damm power.
People say it, because they realize the performance difference is significant. On high end gaming the difference is 30-50fps which is a ton. AMD cpus arent that bad considering their price range, however they are about 5 years behind Intel.
No offence and I am not trying to correct anyone or quote them but.....I would say the diffrence is not 30-50 fps but more like 10-15 fps/.People like to hype-up there hardware which is understandable.Take it from a person thats not on either side the diffrence is not as big as you think./ I can give you an example if ud like from a trustworthy source.Fx 8350 with Msi +Krait edition board x 2 gtx 970 sli vs Intel 5930k with Gigbabyte x99 board ( mid range ) x 2 gtx 970 sli.........Metro last light the diffrence between the 2 systems is 9-10 fps, In aliens vs predator the Amd system actually pulled ahead by a few fps.This is from CPU magazine computer power user. I already know the answer from some people.....But what about this or that game thats cpu bound"?.... People are never happy and tend to bend the results a little bit to there liking.
30 to 50 fps? At what resolution 800x600 lol? Do you game on that resolution? If no then you really should not care about those results. I am not defending anyone here but I hate it when people pull wrong info out the ying-yang and spread false info, some of them actually believe themselfs thats the sad part.