Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Hardware > General Hardware
General Hardware Want to talk about anything Hardware related? This is the place, you can discuss it here.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
AMD Hawaii series (NV 780Ti) thermal issues pin pointing theories.
Old
  (#1)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default AMD Hawaii series (NV 780Ti) thermal issues pin pointing theories. - 11-07-2013, 18:54 | posts: 47

First off, I am NOT an expert! :p I do this as my hobby. I do not have any of these cards (couldn't afford to keep up anymore. Got to take care the wify and the housy! Most of all, Uncle Sam took 1/3 of that! ), therefore, none of it is conformed nor conclusive and most worse of all, it is my opinions!

Here go nothing:
Theory 1, let me make a wild guess... maybe, probably, slight chance, tiny weeny bit of chance... the AMD's engineer team tested the GPU lying down on the test bed and called the date! In this setup (Horizontal) vapor chamber technology had the advantage over the heatpipe. Yeah, why bothered while the AIBs partner going to design their own cooler anyways. Also, resources and money is not a luxury for AMD. "Why not let the AIBs partner launched their own cooler at launch?" I heard someone asked, once. Well, Didn't you noticed the tight lips. With all the leaks, spies.. lawsuits... hint, hint...NV in the house!? ...Sometimes earlier this year... ?!
Anyways, from the pictures (Guru3d.com and other various websites)the cooler is a vapor chamber base. You might/not know the disadvantage of the vapor chamber base is mounting it vertically. Unless, the technology had overcome this issue which I haven't followed. The issue with vapor chamber mounting vertical is that the fluid inside the chamber will draw downward by gravity and therefore not affectively cooling the components properly. This might be hinted why the aftermarket (heatpipe technology) cooler worked great!
Kudos to AMD for thinking of using vapor chamber technology to cool the GPU. Yet, at the same time, implemented the cooling design on GDDRAMs with the same cooler. Thinking it will cooled the GDDRAMs while it cooled the GPU. The problem is, they have to overcome the height differences from various components, PCB bending, warp... and without the BACKPLATE ... to overcome this issue, they used thermal pads. In my opinion, the affectivity of thermal pad is not that good and sometimes its worked against you (just from my personal experienced). I'll guess it worked against AMD designed in this case. see theory 2 for why.

Theory 2, judging from the thermal image (Front) provided by Guru3d.com, the cooler itself seemed to be cool... Toooo cooled for thermal transferring from the GPU. AT which, the back thermal image shown M1=94.6C, M2=79.8C and M3=85.9C. Keep in mind, M1 is at the back of the PCB, through 11(?) layers of PCB and/of coppers plates and traces. Prior to reaching the first top PCB layer is the BGA soldered balls joint on the GPU. As you can IMAGINED THE HEAT at the core of the GPU... this heat needed to be released somehow and as affectively as possible. Therefore, the core GPU must/needed to be pressing against the cooler as much as possible. How much pressure? <-- As much as possible for better thermal transferred. <-- than you cracked the core! ;p Hint, hint... the outer metal frame. The million dollars question is "What is the gap/spacing at the TOP FLAT SURFACE of the GPU and the TOP FLAT SURFACE of the metal frame?". Thermal compounds can do so much... Hint, hint Intel thermal issue.. It is very important the height of the GPU core and the metal frame is to be close as possible (tolerance?). Enough of this craps, let move on.
As mentioned above, the cooler at the GPU core should be reading 95C PLUS and radiated out... and I'm not seeing that (front thermal image). You can see the cooler is hot but not anywhere neared 90C... The HS1=86.5C seemed to be pointed at the front layer of the PCB, GDDRAM... more than 1/2 degree hotter made sense since it is the top layer of the PCB. While the back thermal image shown PCB is trapped with heat. Hottest at M1 (GPU) and radiated out (lesser at the blower). The GDDRAMs shouldn't be at that temp. This kind of temperatures at the GDDRAMs were caused by the trapped heat from the thermal pads (can released heat fast enough at saturation) but mostly by the heat that trapped by the fiberglass of the PCB layers within them are coppers plane, pads and traces. Virtually no air circulated the top of the PCB, obviously. Another evident is the back retention and screws. It is hard connected to the cooler itself, it is part of the cooler and as you can see how cool (not hot) it is. So, to pin point it out, I would said LOOK AT THE GPU CORE AND THE METAL FRAME FOR THE FIXED!
And then you putted the two together, we got the R9-290/X thermal issue!
"Then why does the same basic (minor differences on the cooler and open top) designed on the NV 780 and the Titan worked but not AMD?", you asked. NO, IT'S NOT! Take a good looked at thermal status of the 780TI and you will see what I've meant. NV is suffering the same issue but at the lesser extent and the 780TI shown it limited. Hint, hint.. aftermarket cooler cooled much better than the reference.
There will be more evidences if you view the data careful enough. But that should summed it up with my 2 theories. Again, worst of all... it is my opinion! :p How did I came up with these two theories? <-- Let's just said I giggled when I first saw the 780 and the TiTan cooler design and then I laughed hard when the R9-290 series came out! Go. Dam.it, someone have hacked into my computer and got a copy of my Sapphire Radeon 2900PRO modified pics. Excepted, my is much bigger, cooler and much more kick asses!

And that is my two cents...Errggg... Theories...
   
 
Old
  (#2)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 11-07-2013, 22:17 | posts: 18,718 | Location: New Jersey, USA

that was very hard to read so I really didnt get past a couple of sentences.
my theory is that the cards originally were designed to run at lower frequencies, but the performance would not be there vs the titan and 780 both released months ago.
either that or they really cheaped out on the stock coolers
   
Old
  (#3)
eclap
Ancient Guru
 
eclap's Avatar
 
Videocard: MSI Gaming 970 1450/7800
Processor: i5 2500k @4.5 1.2v
Mainboard: Asus P8Z77-V Pro
Memory: 8GB G-Skill RipjawsX 1600
Soundcard: Aune T1. AD700. DT880
PSU: XFX Black 750W 80+ Gold
Default 11-07-2013, 22:29 | posts: 26,668 | Location: Hampshire, UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
that was very hard to read so I really didnt get past a couple of sentences.
my theory is that the cards originally were designed to run at lower frequencies, but the performance would not be there vs the titan and 780 both released months ago.
either that or they really cheaped out on the stock coolers
+1 wtf wall of text, nobody is going to read that OP, try making your posts a bit more readable.
   
Old
  (#4)
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
 
Loophole35's Avatar
 
Videocard: 670 FTW Sli H2O/780 TFIV
Processor: 2600k@4.8 H2O/2500k@4.5
Mainboard: P8Z68-V PRO/P8Z77-V
Memory: corsair ddr3 8GB@1866
Soundcard: ASUS Phoebus/onboard
PSU: Corsair HX850w/TX850w
Default 11-07-2013, 22:32 | posts: 5,419 | Location: FLA,USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
that was very hard to read so I really didnt get past a couple of sentences.
my theory is that the cards originally were designed to run at lower frequencies, but the performance would not be there vs the titan and 780 both released months ago.
either that or they really cheaped out on the stock coolers
The stock cooler was not engendered for the Hawaii core (probably not even the Tahiti either) it's one they've been using for a while. And yes I also get the feeling that they weren't originally supposed to be clocked at 1000Mhz maybe 850Mhz seeing as that is where they like to down clock to in quiet mode.
   
 
Old
  (#5)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 03:31 | posts: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by eclap View Post
+1 wtf wall of text, nobody is going to read that OP, try making your posts a bit more readable.
My apology for the wall of text. Obviously, English is not my major. That wall of text are the evidences, data and technical inform. pin pointing to the reasons why the cooler failed to cool the GPU properly in the Hawaii series specific and others as a general, whether that NV or AMD products.

Secondly, You're right. I should learned how to make a post, as you can see, I'm a newbie! I'll learned from you and others, from now on. I thank you. I'll summed those up in a couple of words from my previous post.

Failure #1: Vapor chamber does not affectively worked vertically! <-- Go experimented.. come back later and let me know the resulted!

Failure #2: The height of the silicon (GPU core) and the height of the metal frame have to me as closely as possible. If the height of the silicon is higher than the metal frame the cooler might crushed! An if it's to low, the cooler won't affectively cooled the silicon but cooling the frame metal itself.

Among other failures such as no airflow on the PCB surface which evidently shown in the thermal image the Hilbert provided in the reviews. The thermal image clearly shown the heat been trapped and I'm pointing out all the obvious which you might/not see and what's might has caused the issue.

All these issues will resolved with the aftermarket coolers except for failure #2. Water and heatpipe is the way to go in the vertical setup vs vapor chamber. (vapor chamber performed better than heatpipe in the horizontal position).

Failure #2 is relating to the controlled height of the metal frame in relation to the height of the silicon (GPU core). I don't have the actual chip itself to measure it. Can some one provide me that inform.?

THERE, is that how I supposed to post?! :p Much better now?

BTW: @eclap... my advice to you. DO NOT go to the library! Those walls of book will DROWNED you! learned to be patient and find that needle in the hays!

Again, those were my two theories... Errrgg... cents!
   
Old
  (#6)
teleguy
Maha Guru
 
Videocard: GTX 780 GHz/HD7970
Processor: i7 3770K/Phenom 1055T
Mainboard: P8Z77-V/880G Extreme3
Memory: DDR3 8 GB/DDR3 8 GB
Soundcard: Asus Xonar DS
PSU: Corsair 750W/Coolerm 800W
Default 11-08-2013, 17:20 | posts: 1,120

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loophole35 View Post
The stock cooler was not engendered for the Hawaii core (probably not even the Tahiti either) it's one they've been using for a while. And yes I also get the feeling that they weren't originally supposed to be clocked at 1000Mhz maybe 850Mhz seeing as that is where they like to down clock to in quiet mode.
Didn't AMD promise to redesign the cooler a while back?
   
Old
  (#7)
k3vst3r
Ancient Guru
 
k3vst3r's Avatar
 
Videocard: Tri-fire 290x Qnix 120Hz
Processor: i7 4770k 4.6
Mainboard: Asus Maximus Hero VI
Memory: 4x4GB 2400
Soundcard: SB X-FI Titanium
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 11-08-2013, 17:28 | posts: 3,049 | Location: Sheffield UK

my theory, they simply couldn't be bothered designing new cooler

cooler for 780/titan costs fair bit of money for NV to design/make like $80

so AMD just decided launch it does the job


   
Old
  (#8)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 17:49 | posts: 47

^^ Read theory #1 in regarding to vapor chamber cooling technology. NV is not exempted from this issue. Note: 780TI is the evident of the vapor chamber hit it diminishing returned. 780TI will have that issue when oc... thermal limitation!

P.S. ~250W - 300W is their limitation and the diminishing returned... begin

Last edited by DeOdVue; 11-08-2013 at 17:52.
   
Old
  (#9)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 17:56 | posts: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by teleguy View Post
Didn't AMD promise to redesign the cooler a while back?
Why bothered when you (AMD) had limited resource and finance, while the AIBs partner will do that anyway!.

Why reinvented the wheel while the wheel is already at it best!
   
Old
  (#10)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 20:19 | posts: 47

Quote: --> my theory, they simply couldn't be bothered designing new cooler

cooler for 780/titan costs fair bit of money for NV to design/make like $80

so AMD just decided launch it does the job

Sources please?
It might cost more but not a fair bit.

Hell, I even think they were made by a same company!
   
 
Old
  (#11)
CPC_RedDawn
Ancient Guru
 
CPC_RedDawn's Avatar
 
Videocard: 3GB HD7970OC/2GB HD7770
Processor: 4770K@4.5GHz/Q6600@3.6GHz
Mainboard: Z87-GD65 / P5K PREMIUM
Memory: 16GB@1866MHz/4GB@1066MHz
Soundcard: Creative SoundBlaster Z
PSU: 1200W/900W
Default 11-08-2013, 20:22 | posts: 5,957 | Location: Wolverhampton/United Kingdom

Anyone considered they are still using the same 28nm process for this complete and utter beat of chip. With that many transistors on 28nm and a 512bit bus its GOING to draw a ton of power and produce a ton of heat!

Aftermarket coolers will sort it out no problem, and once they drop down to 22nm or further for Volcanic Islands we should hopefully see a nice drop in temps as well.
   
Old
  (#12)
k3vst3r
Ancient Guru
 
k3vst3r's Avatar
 
Videocard: Tri-fire 290x Qnix 120Hz
Processor: i7 4770k 4.6
Mainboard: Asus Maximus Hero VI
Memory: 4x4GB 2400
Soundcard: SB X-FI Titanium
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 11-08-2013, 20:22 | posts: 3,049 | Location: Sheffield UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeOdVue View Post
Quote: --> my theory, they simply couldn't be bothered designing new cooler

cooler for 780/titan costs fair bit of money for NV to design/make like $80

so AMD just decided launch it does the job

Sources please?
It might cost more but not a fair bit.

Hell, I even think they were made by a same company!
Yawns

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...90,3605-2.html

Quote:
In my reviews, Iíve also commented on the fact that Nvidia went with a magnesium alloy fan housing for GeForce GTX 690, and then ditched it for Titan, 780, and 770. My understanding was that this had something to do with cost. But Andrew told me there really wasnít much difference between magnesium and aluminumóat least as far as the metals go. More significant was the manufacturing difficulty.
Quote:
But the biggest issue was that manufacturing yields started off around 10%. Thatís not the GPU, mind you. Just the coolers. Because they were going from raw magnesium to plating, with no brushing or sandblasting in between, all of the dents from the casting line showed through. Someone had to manually sort through everything coming off the line and pick out the pieces without those imperfections. Even then, if you look closely enough, itís still possible to pick out tiny divots in the metal.
TL : DR read whole thing show's how much effort goes into making reference heatsinks for 780/titan



Last edited by k3vst3r; 11-08-2013 at 20:30.
   
Old
  (#13)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 11-08-2013, 21:12 | posts: 18,718 | Location: New Jersey, USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeOdVue View Post
^^ Read theory #1 in regarding to vapor chamber cooling technology. NV is not exempted from this issue. Note: 780TI is the evident of the vapor chamber hit it diminishing returned. 780TI will have that issue when oc... thermal limitation!

P.S. ~250W - 300W is their limitation and the diminishing returned... begin
what are you talking about in this post?
   
Old
  (#14)
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
 
Redemption80's Avatar
 
Videocard: MSI GTX 570
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.5ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 PRO Intel P67
Memory: G.Skill RipJawsX 8GB
Soundcard: ASUS Xonar D2
PSU: Corsair GS800
Default 11-08-2013, 21:28 | posts: 14,930 | Location: Glasgow

k3vst3r nice article, never saw it and very interesting.

Nvidia really do put a lot of time and money into the coolers now, arguably too much when AMD are not spending much to keep the cards as cheap as possible.
   
Old
  (#15)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 22:21 | posts: 47

QUOTE:

Yawns

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...90,3605-2.html


Quote:
In my reviews, Iíve also commented on the fact that Nvidia went with a magnesium alloy fan housing for GeForce GTX 690, and then ditched it for Titan, 780, and 770. My understanding was that this had something to do with cost. But Andrew told me there really wasnít much difference between magnesium and aluminumóat least as far as the metals go. More significant was the manufacturing difficulty.

Quote:
But the biggest issue was that manufacturing yields started off around 10%. Thatís not the GPU, mind you. Just the coolers. Because they were going from raw magnesium to plating, with no brushing or sandblasting in between, all of the dents from the casting line showed through. Someone had to manually sort through everything coming off the line and pick out the pieces without those imperfections. Even then, if you look closely enough, itís still possible to pick out tiny divots in the metal.

TL : DR read whole thing show's how much effort goes into making reference heatsinks for 780/titan

------

OK, awesome, that's shown NV made expensive cooler. So therefore, we can assumed AMD made cheap cooler? <--- I don't understand that logic

Just like saying I'm stupid, therefore you are smart! in some case, VISE VERSA.

P.S. I do read Tom'sHardware and with respected! But don't you think they have been bias if not little?! Especially, the timing of that exact article? Just wondered.

Last edited by DeOdVue; 11-08-2013 at 22:31.
   
Old
  (#16)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 22:26 | posts: 47

It's become obvious to me that quite a few people do not understand how the basic heatpipe and vapor chamber worked.

Let me go deeper into theory #1, how vapor chamber worked in THEORY and in this case. Actually, this would applied to all heatpipe or vapor chamber coolers out there in the market.

In theory, the vapor chamber works better than the heatpipe technology, since the vapor chamber had more contacted surface area than heatpipe. (Google them for more detail information). Basicly, when heated (WHERE ?), the liquid in the chamber or pipe will vaporized, travel upward 'till it cooled enough to turn back to liquid form and repeated the cycle. How to cool it and channel the liquid back as fast as possible is the name of the game.

In reality, the bottom cooler is not where the GPU core located at. Only when you laid your video card flat on the surface then the GPU core is truly at the bottom, otherwise it is at elsewhere. So, as most reviewer tested (vertically) as shown in Guru3D.com, from the image that Hilbert posted, the GPU core is somewhere in the middle. Worst of all, in our tower case , it would be upside down! <-- think about that! As it is upside down, the liquid is at the cool side (drawn by gravity) and the heated side (GPU core) which will be at the top. <-- This is the reason why!

{@}
^)^ <-- Reality doesn't look like that

Last edited by DeOdVue; 11-08-2013 at 22:34.
   
Old
  (#17)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 23:04 | posts: 47

Ok, might as well. Let's going deeper into theory #2: I am questioning and pin pointing out the height of the metal frame located around the GPU. This metal frame was designed to protect the silicon (GPU core) been crushed by the cooler when installed. The height of the metal frame must be controlled. As the metal frame is higher than the silicon than the cooler won't be cooling the silicon affectively. And if, the silicon is higher than the frame metal (how much higher?), the chances are, the cooler might crushed the silicon. This is important to how affectively the cooler released the heat. And how affectively the cooler worked is by the design.

The last time I checked, AMD is a CPU/GPU company and so is NV. Their cooling thermal management, SUCK!
   
Old
  (#18)
k3vst3r
Ancient Guru
 
k3vst3r's Avatar
 
Videocard: Tri-fire 290x Qnix 120Hz
Processor: i7 4770k 4.6
Mainboard: Asus Maximus Hero VI
Memory: 4x4GB 2400
Soundcard: SB X-FI Titanium
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 11-08-2013, 23:05 | posts: 3,049 | Location: Sheffield UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeOdVue View Post
QUOTE:

Yawns

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...90,3605-2.html


Quote:
In my reviews, Iíve also commented on the fact that Nvidia went with a magnesium alloy fan housing for GeForce GTX 690, and then ditched it for Titan, 780, and 770. My understanding was that this had something to do with cost. But Andrew told me there really wasnít much difference between magnesium and aluminumóat least as far as the metals go. More significant was the manufacturing difficulty.

Quote:
But the biggest issue was that manufacturing yields started off around 10%. Thatís not the GPU, mind you. Just the coolers. Because they were going from raw magnesium to plating, with no brushing or sandblasting in between, all of the dents from the casting line showed through. Someone had to manually sort through everything coming off the line and pick out the pieces without those imperfections. Even then, if you look closely enough, itís still possible to pick out tiny divots in the metal.

TL : DR read whole thing show's how much effort goes into making reference heatsinks for 780/titan

------

OK, awesome, that's shown NV made expensive cooler. So therefore, we can assumed AMD made cheap cooler? <--- I don't understand that logic

Just like saying I'm stupid, therefore you are smart! in some case, VISE VERSA.

P.S. I do read Tom'sHardware and with respected! But don't you think they have been bias if not little?! Especially, the timing of that exact article? Just wondered.
Results speak for them self's. AMD cheaped out on cooler everyone knows it. That's why 290x/290 hit 95c an 780/Titan/780 Ti don't


   
Old
  (#19)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 11-08-2013, 23:17 | posts: 18,718 | Location: New Jersey, USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeOdVue View Post
Ok, might as well. Let's going deeper into theory #2: I am questioning and pin pointing out the height of the metal frame located around the GPU. This metal frame was designed to protect the silicon (GPU core) been crushed by the cooler when installed. The height of the metal frame must be controlled. As the metal frame is higher than the silicon than the cooler won't be cooling the silicon affectively. And if, the silicon is higher than the frame metal (how much higher?), the chances are, the cooler might crushed the silicon. This is important to how affectively the cooler released the heat. And how affectively the cooler worked is by the design.

The last time I checked, AMD is a CPU/GPU company and so is NV. Their cooling thermal management, SUCK!
never have I saw anybody type so much and say so little. Of course nvidia stock coolers are better at cooling, the info is all over the interwebs
   
Old
  (#20)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 23:25 | posts: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3vst3r View Post
Results speak for them self's. AMD cheaped out on cooler everyone knows it. That's why 290x/290 hit 95c an 780/Titan/780 Ti don't
better resulted does not automatic concluded the others are cheap out. Again, where is the source that AMD made it cheap? Until than, I'm not judging.

The 290 PERFORMED better than the 780... does that mean the 780 "cheaping" out?
   
Old
  (#21)
k3vst3r
Ancient Guru
 
k3vst3r's Avatar
 
Videocard: Tri-fire 290x Qnix 120Hz
Processor: i7 4770k 4.6
Mainboard: Asus Maximus Hero VI
Memory: 4x4GB 2400
Soundcard: SB X-FI Titanium
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 11-08-2013, 23:27 | posts: 3,049 | Location: Sheffield UK

Still stand by my original statement, 290/290X the reference cooler does good enough job in eye's of AMD, even though many gamers are waiting for custom coolers instead for 290/290X


   
Old
  (#22)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-08-2013, 23:31 | posts: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
never have I saw anybody type so much and say so little. Of course nvidia stock coolers are better at cooling, the info is all over the interwebs
My cooler is bigger, better than your! <--- what's your point?

My point is trying to pin point out the failures of the cooler (Hawaii series specific and other cooler as general).

Have a good weekend!
   
Old
  (#23)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 11-08-2013, 23:35 | posts: 18,718 | Location: New Jersey, USA

amd cheaped out on the stock cooler, whats so hard about that?
custom coolers for the 290x 290 show around a 30c reduction in temps. its not rocket science
   
Old
  (#24)
k3vst3r
Ancient Guru
 
k3vst3r's Avatar
 
Videocard: Tri-fire 290x Qnix 120Hz
Processor: i7 4770k 4.6
Mainboard: Asus Maximus Hero VI
Memory: 4x4GB 2400
Soundcard: SB X-FI Titanium
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 11-08-2013, 23:39 | posts: 3,049 | Location: Sheffield UK

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
amd cheaped out on the stock cooler, whats so hard about that?
custom coolers for the 290x 290 show around a 30c reduction in temps. its not rocket science
^ exactly my point


   
Old
  (#25)
DeOdVue
Member Guru
 
Videocard: AMD, HD5850
Processor: Phenom II 955
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair
Default 11-09-2013, 01:11 | posts: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
amd cheaped out on the stock cooler, whats so hard about that?
custom coolers for the 290x 290 show around a 30c reduction in temps. its not rocket science

Again, there is no source information to support this. you might called it all you like. As for me, I'll hold my judgement.

There is no argued that's the custom cooler reduced by some 30C, no doubt, no question about it! But I thought I posted that, too. --> "This might be hinted why the aftermarket (heatpipe technology) cooler worked great!" and "Hint, hint.. aftermarket cooler cooled much better than the reference."

Failure to design efficiently is not cheaped out!

Blower = expensive, noisy, high air statics, but yet, inaffectively cool vs. the traditional fan...

vapor chamber is more expensive, better cooling (theory)... and yet it failed miserably vs. the heatpipe!

What is wrong with this pictures? ^^

Now, back to my points. I am pointing out all these failures with a big capital PERIOD. As a hardware tech hobby-ish, I posted this hoping for some answers. People with same hobby would tried to troubleshoot to help the world a better place. I do know and understand the tests resulted and data are all over the places. for you, you might used that data results to compare among each others. And that is fine, actually I encouraged that. But for me and pretty sure quite a bit of others are more interested in taking the data results to EVALUATED, ANALYZE, DIGEST.... that it's this is all about!

Am I not in a hardware tech web forum??? NO way, Get out! I thought this is what we do here, too. Beside, telling how big my EPEENNNnnnnnn is

Love to the world!
{@}
^)^

Last edited by DeOdVue; 11-09-2013 at 01:21.
   
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2014, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.