Tomb Raider 2013 Benchmark Thread

MfA · **Memory**: 4GB DDR2 1000MHz 5-5-5-15

WhiteLightning · 03-04-2013, 17:02 | posts: 20,604 | Location: Netherlands

So what did you get ?

MfA · **Memory**: 4GB DDR2 1000MHz 5-5-5-15

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteLightning

So what did you get ?

I dont have the game yet, though here is a fine specimen

3930k@4.5, 16GB Ram, 2xGigabyte Titans
2560x1600, Ultimate settings, 2xSSAA

WhiteLightning · 03-04-2013, 17:15 | posts: 20,604 | Location: Netherlands

WOW, 2 titans. guess it willl run at 20fps for me on my 580

Shmaks · 03-04-2013, 18:08 | posts: 18 | Location: Ukraine

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteLightning

WOW, 2 titans. guess it willl run at 20fps for me on my 580

I think, its because TressFX enabled on high. With TressFX disable optimization great.

-Tj- · 03-04-2013, 18:41 | posts: 2,651 | Location: Downtown ✈

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shmaks

I think, its because TressFX enabled on high. With TressFX disable optimization great.

I think its supersampling AA fault, this thing is a killer in any game atm.

Check SleepingDogs, SniperElite v2, TheWitcher2,..

Lane · *Last edited by Lane; 03-04-2013 at 21:37.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Tj-

I think its supersampling AA fault, this thing is a killer in any game atm.

Check SleepingDogs, SniperElite v2, TheWitcher2,..

its clear if you enable SSAA ( 2 or 4x ) at 2560x1600 + all max setting , this will be normal ( then we dont know if the SLI profile is ready ).. FXAA could be enabled anyway.

scatman839 · *Last edited by scatman839; 03-05-2013 at 00:31.*

surely the point of the benchmark would be to do it at the same settings as everyone else?

ie, 1080p ultimate

here's mines

33.6, up 1fps from when I did it 10 hours ago.

fr33jack · *Last edited by fr33jack; 03-05-2013 at 00:39.*

Those are mine benchmarks results/ Catalyst 13.2 beta7:

1080p, Vsync On, Ultimate settings (tFX On) -

1080p, Vsync On, Ultra settings (tFX Off) -

Note, difference between Ultra and Ultimate = tFX On/ Off

IMO, despite the fact that the tFX looks really cool and awesome though with unnecessary performance hit at medium range graphics cards (not optimazed build/ drivers?) ... the game has a very not cool (unpleasant) way to implement how the hairs rendered on Lara (NPC's) - they do not lie on the shoulders of the characters, but it lies over the invisible boundaries (3d mesh) of the body - not cool, not cool at all...this one little flaw make this feature kinda defective...because it is there and you can see it all the time while playing...

PS. If anyone found out what the "high precision" function do, pls let me know ?

It costs me 4-8 FPS with tFX=Off and I don't see any differences ...very appreciated for any help here.

eclap · 03-05-2013, 01:05 | posts: 18,967 | Location: Hampshire UK

1080p, ultimate, no TressFX, 2xSSAA

1080p, ultimate, with TressFX, 2xSSAA

eclap · 03-05-2013, 01:18 | posts: 18,967 | Location: Hampshire UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by fr33jack

Those are mine benchmarks results/ Catalyst 13.2 beta7:

what's the point in benching with Vsync on?

fr33jack · 03-05-2013, 01:22 | posts: 190 | Location: Moscow | Russia

Quote:

Originally Posted by eclap

what's the point in benching with Vsync on?

Well, in this case the point is in "tFX" feature FPS comparison

doubleyouare · 03-05-2013, 05:35 | posts: 1 | Location: Dallas, TX

Ultimate settings...FXAA, triple buffering, tFX on, 1920x1080

Ultimate, FXAA, trip buff, tFX off, 1920x1080

r9800pro · 03-05-2013, 05:57 | posts: 17 | Location: Egypt

HD 6990 Ultra and Ultimate (TressFX Off in Ultra and On in Ultimate)

1920x1080 and 5992x1080 Eyefinity with Bezel Compensation :

1920x1080 Ultra:

1920x1080 Ultimate:

5992x1080 Ultra:

5992x1080 Ultimate:

Bradders684 · 03-05-2013, 06:10 | posts: 213

I think there is some thing wrong for me.

Ultra 4xSSAA

Ultra AA off

I get 48fps with 4xSSAA and 49fps with no AA. I thought the SSAA was like Ubersampling in the Witcher 2? or am I wrong?

jeffokada81

Setting on ULTIMATE 1080p

qx9650 @ 4.02ghz w/ m80 corsair cooler
Sapphire 7970 in CS @ 1050/1500
8GB Ram @ 1600 (stock)

LimitGTX · 03-05-2013, 14:45 | posts: 1

hey jeffokada81 are your video cards both ATI GHZ edition cards or are you just over clocking them normal 7970? i'm looking at getting something to replace my 5870 after this game crushed my video card and your setup looks promising.

Hubble · 03-05-2013, 17:55 | posts: 56

FXAA

4xSSAA

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

jeffokada81 · *Last edited by jeffokada81; 03-05-2013 at 19:41.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by LimitGTX

hey jeffokada81 are your video cards both ATI GHZ edition cards or are you just over clocking them normal 7970? i'm looking at getting something to replace my 5870 after this game crushed my video card and your setup looks promising.

I flashed the GHZ edition firmware onto my reference cards. You may see artifacts in some games. I didnt have any problems in Crysis3, minor artifacts in BF3 and alot in Dead Space 3. None in Tomb Raider =)

I just use CCC to turn the clocks back to 925/1050 when video starts to get too annoying.

btw, i was able to find both cards for $350 each if you look hard enough

Edit:
All this talk about overclocking, I went on and changed my clocks to 1100/1800 with +4% on power limit and I got a max 129 fps on the bench. 7fps increase for a slight tweak aint bad. =) (using msi after burner. Trixx is garbage)

MfA · **Memory**: 4GB DDR2 1000MHz 5-5-5-15

@r9800pro

resize the images in your post to max 1280px width pls..

edit: lol morbias've already done that, while i was typing!

MfA · **Memory**: 4GB DDR2 1000MHz 5-5-5-15

ridiculous but it seems like my system is pcie bus limited.. look at the pcie traffic,gonna try lowering texture settings maybe it's run out of vram..

1080p, Ultimate, FXAA
GTX4601GB@900/4200MHz, Q9650@4.25GHz

------------

yep it was all about the vram, texture quality @low and pcie usage backed down to normal level, and vram usage was 660MB.. not to mention avg FPS is just doubled..

1080p, Ultimate, FXAA, TextureQ low
GTX4601GB@900/4200MHz, Q9650@4.25GHz

Khaled · 03-05-2013, 22:23 | posts: 19 | Location: Tunisia

That's weird, your GTX460 can do much better, try disabling TressFx

MfA · **Memory**: 4GB DDR2 1000MHz 5-5-5-15

1080p, Ultimate, FXAA, TressFx Off, TextureQ High
GTX4601GB@900/4200Mhz, Q9650@4.25GHz, ForceWare 314.07(HQ)

1080p, Ultimate, FXAA, TressFx Off, TextureQ Ultra, High Precision Off(this is a vram hog, without it vram ultra isn't problem at all!)
GTX4601GB@930/4600Mhz, Q9650@4.25GHz, ForceWare 314.07(HQ)

kam03 · 03-05-2013, 23:04 | posts: 384 | Location: UK

1920x1200, Ultimate, TressFx On, FXAA.

Min: 22.6
Max: 47.2
Average: 39.2

Is this normal for my setup? seems really low lol.

Hubble · 03-05-2013, 23:11 | posts: 56

It definitely does use a lot of VRAM. I'm showing well over 4GB being used on Ultimate setting with 4xSSAA on.