Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn

[WhiteLightning]

See just how well FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn will run on your computer. This official benchmark software uses actual maps and characters to assign a score to your PC and rate its performance.

High Definition Display Support
In addition to the standard 1280x720 pixel display, the benchmark also supports a 1920x1080 high definition display. Enjoy every crisp detail of the gorgeous world of Eorzea.

5.1 Channel Surround Sound
Fully voiced event dialogue imparts every note of character emotion, and 5.1 channel surround sound completes the experience, wrapping players in the stirring music and the atmospheric effects of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn.

Multilingual Support
Features Japanese, English, German, and French.

Depending on your system’s resident software and hardware, it is possible that FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn may not run optimally, even if your computer meets the minimum system requirements. We therefore recommend using this benchmark software to check your system before purchasing the product.

Note:
- This software is not a trial version.
- Please understand that you cannot play FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn using this software. Also, note that you must read and agree to the terms and conditions before downloading the software.
- AMD CrossFireX and Nvidia SLI are not supported at this time.
We are currently working with the manufacturers to add support for these features by the launch of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn.

Download: http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/..._download.html

Version 1.0.0.2 Release Notes – Updated 3/14/2013
What's New
- The Screen Mode option has been added and includes the following settings:

- Windowed
- Full Screen
- Borderless Windowed
* When set to borderless windowed, the benchmark will be run using your desktop resolution.
* When set to full screen, the mouse will be disabled while the benchmark is calculating your score.
- If your computer is not running a compatible version of Direct X, an error message will be displayed when launching the benchmark.

Bug Fixes
The following issues have been addressed.
- An issue wherein certain error messages were erroneously displayed.
- An issue wherein the file FFXIV.cfg was created in the root directory where the benchmark client was installed. (If installed on the C drive, C:\)
- An issue where clicking the start button multiple times would load multiple instances of the benchmark.
- An issue wherein the DirectX version information was not correctly verified.

Download: http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/benchmark/

[WhiteLightning]

4870x2 default clocks + i7-930 @ 4ghz



too bad it doesnt have full screen though my scores wouldnt improve because of cfx

[mikeysg]

Ran the benchmark on my 2nd rig, it is hard on the CPU and I think my FX8120 @3.7ghz got hammered in some scenes. Overall, it did OK, I guess having 2x GTX670 in SLi helped somewhat (although SLi may not be working as of now)

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/22/2013 8:36:29 PM
Score:5924
Average Framerate:52.639
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum

[ricardonuno1980]

New fast download

[MfA]

gpu usage is all over :/
severe cpu bottleneck, gurus donate me a 4770k pls

Q9650@4335MHz(8.5x510), ForceWare 314.07(Q), Win 7 U x64 SP1, 1920x1080 maximum

GTX4601GB@675/3600MHz - SCORE: 3777




GTX4601GB@900/4200MHz - SCORE: 4575

[ricardonuno1980]

look new download updated (my post #4) due to "false" FIV (2010).

[ricardonuno1980]

Win 7 x64 SP1 with i5-2500K@4.5GHz and GTX 480@stock-reference 313.96beta(HQ):

Maximum preset at 1920x1080




@-Tj-: You may not beat me due to CPU bottlenecked. eheh! xD

[Wohlrajh]

Here is my result with max graphic options @ 1080p



The game seems to look nice,we will see if it can top Guild Wars 2...
I just had several FPS dips to 30s but overall it was good.

[ricardonuno1980]

look same CPU/GPU speeds and 1920x1080 in my post #7

Maximum preset at 1280x720

[The Phoenix]

not too bad

[signex]

Score: 8238

1920x1080, every settings maxed out.

CPU OC: 4,2ghz, GPU: 1050/6008

[UNREAL_2004]

2500K @ 4Ghz + GTX670 @ 1200/7000
1920x1080 Maximum (HQ & forced AFx16)

[-Tj-]

lol Ricardo if I could OC to 4.5Ghz it would be better too and my quad is 5years old

OC 950mhz/2280mhz

720P


1080P



The game is not very optimized imo, I never saw cpu usage over 60%, mostly between 30-50%. They should have used dx11 multithreading and not dx9..

Also what happened to Luminous Engine? I thought this is gonna use it not some dated gfx

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by -Tj-

lol Ricardo if I could OC to 4.5Ghz it would be better too and my quad is 5years old

OC 950mhz/2280mhz

720P
http://i.imgur.com/brGFiDb.png

1080P
http://i.imgur.com/EfUBavR.png


The game is not very optimized imo, I never saw cpu usage over 60%, mostly between 30-50%. They should have used dx11 multithreading and not dx9..

Also what happened to Luminous Engine? I thought this is gonna use it not some dated gfx

Friend. Yeah. I'm true that you can't beat me despite your OC for GPU.

[-Tj-]

Here is stock gpu, but with 2 cpu tweaks lol, rest at max.

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by -Tj-

Here is stock gpu, but with 2 cpu tweaks lol, rest at max.

http://i.imgur.com/uaifDST.png

ok but tweaks may be lighter for GPU. I will try at your same settings...

[-Tj-]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

ok but tweaks may be lighter for GPU. I will try at your same settings...

Nope those 2 tweaks (culling and lower LOD) are lighter for CPU. ;P

[Mr.Bigtime]

Meh

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by -Tj-

Nope those 2 tweaks (culling and lower LOD) are lighter for CPU. ;P

ok, I'm not mistaken.



I will change speed to stock for CPU@3.3GHz and try.

[DZcreet]

in 1200

in 1080

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by DZcreet

The 1920*1080 rez option doesn't show for me but, the 1920*1200 does? strange.
http://oi48.tinypic.com/2w7que0.jpg

This option HAS "1920x1080". lol


CPU@stock without Turbo Boost:

look same settings my post #19

[DZcreet]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

This option HAS "1920x1080". lol


CPU@stock without Turbo Boost:

look same settings my post #19

yeah it wasnt in order of lowest to highest. oh well, reran it in 1080

[Hubble]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[joe87]

Default Clock

[Phreakuency]

Hmm 1920x1080 Max I get 7190

I am finding with benchmarks I am no better than most ppl with one 680 and often even slower. I don't get it. Is it because my settings in Nvidia Panel are pretty much all at max?