Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Videocards > Videocards - AMD - ATI
Videocards - AMD - ATI AMD Radeon graphics cards. Do you have one or want to buy one? Use this forum to discuss anything concerning products using Radeon graphics cards, CrossFireX, from Radeon 9800 to HD 6900


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2 should perform better?
Old
  (#1)
Tee_k
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
Processor: Intel core 2 Quad Q9550
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX 850w
Default Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2 should perform better? - 12-03-2012, 15:29 | posts: 5

Hi, i had to register here because i need some ancient hardcore knowledge when it comes to this card. There is obviously not a secret that these cards have their share of problems around the world. But i think my system should perform better in games, way better. (i hope).

My System:
Motherboard: Asus P5Q
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.83 @ 3.4ghz
Ram: 4x OCZ PC2-6400 Gold Edition 2Gb @ 832 mhz 8gb total
Graphics Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
PSU: Corsair HX 850w

All running with Windows 8.


I don't play a lot "insane" games, only some World of Warcraft and some Battlefield 3 sometimes. But i have fairly low settings in both of the games, and it still seems that the card can't handle it.

For those who plays or have played WoW, i run 40-50 fps in stormwind with no people there, and fairly low settings.

Yes i have enabled the Catalyst A.I and set it 2 Advance mode. People say that it enables the Crossfire, but i don't see any difference if i have it off or on or whatever in games. I have also tried millions of drivers, and i currently use 10.4v. I seem to get the "highest" fps with that.

Bottom line, is it just me or should my setup run especially WoW way better? I get some kind of flickering in high mountains often. The card temps are just fine, rather good for a card like that. 60-70C and under Load max 75-85C. All the games are installed on a Raptor disk.

Halp please?

EDIT: I also got a EVGA 8800GTX Graphic card, and i didn't notice big differences in fps, if i noticed some difference at all. These card isn't even in the same ballpark are they? Radeon card should rape the EVGA card?

Last edited by Tee_k; 12-03-2012 at 15:32.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#2)
kevsamiga1974
Master Guru
 
kevsamiga1974's Avatar
 
Videocard: ULA
Processor: Z80A
Mainboard: © 1982 Sinclair Research
Memory: Bubble Memory
Soundcard: Piezoelectric speakers
PSU: Solar Powered
Default 12-03-2012, 17:38 | posts: 756 | Location: England

Ditch Windows 8 and stay with Windows 7 if you want to use a leg*** card with any decent drivers. There is only one driver available supporting for Windows 8 and it's total plop IMO. Clock bugs on second ASIC.

Using 10.4 isn't a good idea either if you want crossfire to work properly on more games, because profiles are inside the driver files as well as just the caps. 10.4 is severely out of date. Not a good idea.

Make sure you have decent CAPS and sufficiently high driver to match it, say 11.12+CAPS. Wow should work ok in that case then.

There is simply no reason to be saddled on 10.4 because newer profiles are needed for newer games on multigpu. Try fifa 12 on 10.4 and you'll see what I mean, jerky mess because the drivers are just not mature enough, and well you will just encounter weird glitches and bugs with newer stuff or the image quality will be worse. Mostly no choice here but to use something recent. Although it was the last version where OpenGL worked mostly, they stopped improving the 4870x2 at 10.10 when they finally fixed the second gpu being idle and doing nothing in games from 10.6 onwards.

10.4 on some games it will be equivelent to using 1 gpu because x-fire will not engage automatically on specific titles, resulting in performance drops. Or it will show gpu's are loaded but you won't get the performance you're supposed to in any case.

Unfortunately you are discovering the quirks of multigpu crossfire setups, and how problematic they can be.

11.9 is always a fallback failsafe for me when things were problematic, if nothing else works try those.

Last edited by kevsamiga1974; 12-03-2012 at 17:53.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
GotNoRice
Member Guru
 
GotNoRice's Avatar
 
Videocard: 2x GTX680 SLI
Processor: 2500K @ 5Ghz
Mainboard: ASUS P8Z68-V
Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium
PSU: Antec Quattro 1000w
Default 12-04-2012, 07:49 | posts: 80 | Location: Pleasant Hill, California

You should be using 12.6 + latest CAPs. Absolutely no reason to be using old drivers, especially with Windows 8.

World of Warcraft is the main game I play. I play this game considerably. For years, and up until earlier this year I ran 2x 4870x2 in quad CF in my main computer. I still have the cards in my secondary computer. These cards run World of Warcraft just fine.

As far as your settings go, the most important thing is to make sure you are running the game in Fullscreen. There is another setting, "Windowed (Fullscreen)" that is basically a maximized window. Many like to use this setting because with multiple monitors it will allow your cursor to go off the main screen without having to alt-tab, etc. Unfortunately crossfire will not function at all in any form of windowed mode, even a maximized window, so make sure you have the game set to Fullscreen.

Other than that, you want to run the game in DirectX11 rather than DirectX9. Even though the card is only DirectX 10.1, it will run the DirectX11 game using the 10.1 feature level, which is still an improvement over the 9.3 feature level (DirectX9c).

Catalyst AI does not need to be set to advanced for crossfire to function. Disabling Catalyst AI will disable crossfire but it can be set to either Standard of Advanced and crossfire will function. I believe AMD recommends leaving it on standard.

Sometimes the shadows will flicker with crossfire but usually adjusting the shadows slider up or down one notch will fix it. This minor issue is the only issue there has been with crossfire in this game for a while.

Even just one of the GPUs on the 4870x2 is faster than an 8800GTX.

Last edited by GotNoRice; 12-04-2012 at 07:51.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
kevsamiga1974
Master Guru
 
kevsamiga1974's Avatar
 
Videocard: ULA
Processor: Z80A
Mainboard: © 1982 Sinclair Research
Memory: Bubble Memory
Soundcard: Piezoelectric speakers
PSU: Solar Powered
Default 12-04-2012, 14:40 | posts: 756 | Location: England

Humbug...the latest drivers are a complete turkey for legacy multigpu cards. I don't want to be a party pooper but...

12.6 is already "old"...based as it stands on a driver from April. Nothing new since then apart from token CAP updates, Farcry 3 driver optimisations for 4870x2, or a promised quarterly release schedule of the new suppport model, forget it...

There has been plenty to benefit from since this time since April, but nothing has filtered down to those still holding the legacy badge. So if you're going to be using a driver that's already over 6 months old anyway, no reason not to use an even older one and get your robbed performance back, Windows 8 aside. eg. 12.6 BFBC2 = 38fps 4870x2, 12.2 preview BFBC2 = 60fps 4870x2 all @1080p same hardware/Win7 x64

Therefore it boils down to a case of choosiing the lesser of two evils, old or older drivers...

And as far as that goes 11.x series were much less problematic than the 12.x series for 4870x2 before textures started disappearing and performance nosedived in games along with multigpu clock bugs inherent in 12.x. And an altogether less polished experience for the lower end of the spectrum, busy as they were, concentrating on improving the 7000 series starting circa 12.2.

When it comes to AMD drivers, newer does not always equate to better in my experience because old cards get forgotten about, and oddities and performance drops which don't occur on DX11 hardware, can create problems and issues for older cards.

Although....on a bastardised tablet OS you might not have any choice but to use 12.6 due to CCC.

Crossfire shadow flickering in specific game titles started after 10.5, and I'm willing to bet he doesn't experience this with WOW on 10.4. It happens in Company of heroes too and it was never fixed, even up to 12.6 because something got changed with how the driver handles internal crossfire starting from 10.6. On 10.5 down to 8.7 game shadows don't "crossfire flicker". Only on newer drivers...

Last edited by kevsamiga1974; 12-04-2012 at 15:12.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#5)
GotNoRice
Member Guru
 
GotNoRice's Avatar
 
Videocard: 2x GTX680 SLI
Processor: 2500K @ 5Ghz
Mainboard: ASUS P8Z68-V
Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium
PSU: Antec Quattro 1000w
Default 12-04-2012, 18:32 | posts: 80 | Location: Pleasant Hill, California

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevsamiga1974 View Post
Humbug...the latest drivers are a complete turkey for legacy multigpu cards.
I don't have any of the performance loss or texture issues that you report when using the latest drivers. 12.6 + latest CAPs has always given me equivalent or better performance to older drivers and this has held true with my 4870x2s by themselves as well as in Quad-Crossfire, and also with my other computer running 4850s in crossfire. There is certainly nothing to fear about the latest drivers when it comes to WoW. The shadows flickering was always sporadic and I'm not sure if it even occurs with the latest drivers as it never occurred on my preferred shadows setting anyway. There are about 8 different notches on the shadows slider and it only ever occurred on one of them. I have over 400 days of played time in WoW; the game is very important to me. If newer drivers had lowered performance, I would have reverted in a heartbeat.

This is the performance I was getting before I switched over to my 680s in SLI. This was done with the 12.6 drivers @1080P with all settings at Ultra, 12xAA (4x Edge Detect) using DX11 and the 64-bit client. I did a /timetest then used the free druid flight path from Moonglade to Thunder Bluff. Of course that was also with 4 GPUs and a 5Ghz sandy bridge but point is, I don't think the drivers were holding anything back.

Min: 22.692
Max: 237.706
Avg: 147.645

Last edited by GotNoRice; 12-04-2012 at 18:37.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Tee_k
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
Processor: Intel core 2 Quad Q9550
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX 850w
Default 12-06-2012, 00:53 | posts: 5

Hmm, i now installed Win7 and all of its updates, and the 12.6 drivers for the card. I also reset my BIOS, in case that ruined anything. Yes i noticed a big difference when it came to FPS in WoW. A 40-50fps increase in some places. Still struggle in raids etc tho, 15-20fps in 10man, with Shadow visibility on low, and the visibility length set to "fair" the lowest.

I use full screen of course. What do you guys mean by CAPS? Game profiles?
I don't think my game will run much smoother if i clock the Cpu back up to 3.4ghz. I've been told that WoW doesn't require much Cpu power. Its just something weird about this card, cant put my finger on it, just have this odd feeling about it.

Maybe its just me who wants it to be better than it really is. But i payed a ****load for this system 3-4 years ago, so i just expected more. But i guess when it comes down to it, i have to build a new and modern pc if i want that performance i really and truly want..
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
naike
Maha Guru
 
naike's Avatar
 
Videocard: Asus EAH5870
Processor: Phenom II x4 965BE
Mainboard: Asus M4A89GTD Pro/USB3
Memory: 4GB OCZ
Soundcard: Asus Xonar ST & HD555's
PSU: Antec Quattro 850W
Default 12-06-2012, 02:33 | posts: 2,019

I know how you feel man. A decent gaming system costs 1500€ roughly, and that won't last for years as you would like it to :dd
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
GotNoRice
Member Guru
 
GotNoRice's Avatar
 
Videocard: 2x GTX680 SLI
Processor: 2500K @ 5Ghz
Mainboard: ASUS P8Z68-V
Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium
PSU: Antec Quattro 1000w
Default 12-06-2012, 10:54 | posts: 80 | Location: Pleasant Hill, California

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tee_k View Post
What do you guys mean by CAPS?
http://sites.amd.com/us/game/downloa...-profiles.aspx

You can install them over the top of the 12.6 legacy drivers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tee_k View Post
I've been told that WoW doesn't require much Cpu power.
I don't know that it "requires" much CPU power but it certainly does benefit from it. I was running a Q9650 overclocked to 4.4 Ghz before and upgrading to a 2500k @ 5Ghz was a huge upgrade that made an immediately noticeable difference. MMOs are notorious for hitting the CPU hard, especially in a raid environment.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Tee_k
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
Processor: Intel core 2 Quad Q9550
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX 850w
Default 12-27-2012, 20:38 | posts: 5

I just want to give an update regarding my system.

I installed Windows 7 again without overclocking, and the system have been pretty stable and performing better now. But i do feel the lack of performance still, but i think i'm starting to accept that fact. A 4-5 year old system, that still manages to run games like wow and battlefield 3 with descent graphics. With some tweaking and adjustments you can make the game run fps smooth. Even tho the game almost maxes out my CPU(q9550).

I am thinking about just buying a new Graphics card, but my motherboard offers only a 2.0 graphic speed, and the newer cards today, needs 3.0. So i really don't know what to do. Any tips regarding that?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
PF Prophet
Master Guru
 
Videocard: 2x7870 2gb Dual-X(short)
Processor: AMD FX-8350@4.6ghz
Mainboard: Crosshair V-Z
Memory: 4x8gb Gskill Ares 1866
Soundcard: CHV-Z + z5500
PSU: PCP&C turbo cool 1200w
Default 12-27-2012, 22:10 | posts: 157 | Location: Washington

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tee_k View Post
I just want to give an update regarding my system.

I installed Windows 7 again without overclocking, and the system have been pretty stable and performing better now. But i do feel the lack of performance still, but i think i'm starting to accept that fact. A 4-5 year old system, that still manages to run games like wow and battlefield 3 with descent graphics. With some tweaking and adjustments you can make the game run fps smooth. Even tho the game almost maxes out my CPU(q9550).

I am thinking about just buying a new Graphics card, but my motherboard offers only a 2.0 graphic speed, and the newer cards today, needs 3.0. So i really don't know what to do. Any tips regarding that?
they do not require or even in most cases take any real advantage of the 3.0, all pci-e versions are backward compatible, I have a friend who for 2 months ran his 6870's in an old Xpress200 chipset(480x chipset) and they worked fine, despite being a bit crippled by the cpu in that rig....

the story behind that was due to intel jerkin him around on an RMA of an 980x, in the end he gave up and replaced the board and cpu with an x6 1100t he bought from a site that cherry picks(hes at 4.3 on it), a month later intel finely sent him the replacement cpu that he then sold with the board due to his anger at how he was jerked around(no excuse for it taking months to rma a cpu....none at all....specially a extreme edition chip....)

hes now running 3 6950's(all unlocked) without issues and hes only using a 890fx ud7 motherboard(only has pcie2).

if you want to upgrade, grab a decent card, then, as you can afford it, grab a cpu/mobo/ram combo even if its a lower end cpu on a decent board, you can always upgrade the cpu....keep in mind, intel changes sockets like some women change shoes......so you will want to plan to get your cpu upgrade within say a year of grabbing the new board.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#11)
shimyns
Maha Guru
 
shimyns's Avatar
 
Videocard: SAPPHIRE r9 290x Tri-X OC
Processor: core i7 950 @4HT NH-D14
Mainboard: Gigabyte X58A-UD3R rev.2
Memory: RipJaws 3x2GB 1600 Mhz
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX850 850W
Default 12-27-2012, 23:38 | posts: 1,635 | Location: Boston

It is very important to install the latest caps. I use the 12.6 drivers and the latest caps. I play with most of the settings on the highest, in most games, even the newest ones, such as hitman absolution. Having some trouble with far cry 3 but that is because it is a total GPU hog and doesn't use the CPU at all.

All in all, this card is still quite powerful and can handle any game. Install the caps as suggested.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Tee_k
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
Processor: Intel core 2 Quad Q9550
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX 850w
Default 12-28-2012, 11:34 | posts: 5

Quote:
hes now running 3 6950's(all unlocked) without issues and hes only using a 890fx ud7 motherboard(only has pcie2).

if you want to upgrade, grab a decent card, then, as you can afford it, grab a cpu/mobo/ram combo even if its a lower end cpu on a decent board, you can always upgrade the cpu....keep in mind, intel changes sockets like some women change shoes......so you will want to plan to get your cpu upgrade within say a year of grabbing the new board.
That is a relief, thanks a lot mate. I was thinking of buying a:

- Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 GHz 3GB.

And later on buy a upgrade package like this:

- Intel® Core i7-3820 Processor, Socket-LGA2011, Quad Core, 3.6Ghz, 10MB, Boxed

- ASUS P9X79, Socket-2011,ATX, X79, 8xDDR3, 3xPCIe(3.0)x16, CFX&SLI, SATA 6Gb/s, USB 3.0, FW, EFI

- Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz 8GB CL9, Kit w/2x 4GB XMS3 modules, CL9-9-9-24, 1.5V, Vengeance Heatspreader, 240


That package costs around 800usd without the Graphics card. Is this a Ok upgrade? or could i do better? I have been wanting to try out AMD cpu for some time now, see how it works.

Last edited by Tee_k; 12-28-2012 at 11:38.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Tee_k
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire Radeon HD 4870X2
Processor: Intel core 2 Quad Q9550
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair HX 850w
Default 12-28-2012, 11:36 | posts: 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by shimyns View Post
It is very important to install the latest caps. I use the 12.6 drivers and the latest caps. I play with most of the settings on the highest, in most games, even the newest ones, such as hitman absolution. Having some trouble with far cry 3 but that is because it is a total GPU hog and doesn't use the CPU at all.

All in all, this card is still quite powerful and can handle any game. Install the caps as suggested.
I have installed the latest drivers, 12.6 and the latest Caps as suggested. But i still notice fps drops in games like World Of Warcraft and especially Battlefield 3. But after i installed windows 7 again, the system has been more stable, no doubt.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
PF Prophet
Master Guru
 
Videocard: 2x7870 2gb Dual-X(short)
Processor: AMD FX-8350@4.6ghz
Mainboard: Crosshair V-Z
Memory: 4x8gb Gskill Ares 1866
Soundcard: CHV-Z + z5500
PSU: PCP&C turbo cool 1200w
Default 12-28-2012, 20:03 | posts: 157 | Location: Washington

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tee_k View Post
That is a relief, thanks a lot mate. I was thinking of buying a:

- Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 GHz 3GB.

And later on buy a upgrade package like this:

- Intel® Core i7-3820 Processor, Socket-LGA2011, Quad Core, 3.6Ghz, 10MB, Boxed

- ASUS P9X79, Socket-2011,ATX, X79, 8xDDR3, 3xPCIe(3.0)x16, CFX&SLI, SATA 6Gb/s, USB 3.0, FW, EFI

- Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz 8GB CL9, Kit w/2x 4GB XMS3 modules, CL9-9-9-24, 1.5V, Vengeance Heatspreader, 240


That package costs around 800usd without the Graphics card. Is this a Ok upgrade? or could i do better? I have been wanting to try out AMD cpu for some time now, see how it works.
my advice is look for a kit with a K series cpu, then add a 3rd party cooler, also the ram is "ok" I would aim for something 1866 with how prices have been dropping(i got my 32gb 1866 kit for $110 recently on sale) depending on cost, you would probably at least want to add a 2nd ram kit, without it your gonna be running at dual rather then quad channel. and that kinda sucks.

I build intel for people but never for myself, I get tired of the socket changes that for a time had me swapping out motherboards on a regular basis, and if theres anything I hate having to do its swap out motherboards...my current boards had a athlon II 435@b35(unlocked tricore to quad), a 1055t@3.6(4.1 all cores when turbo kicked in) and a 8120@4.5, it will in the next few months get an 8350, pretty good upgrade path for my needs.

I will agree if you just game and dont do heavily multi-threaded tasks and dont tend to upgrade your cpu intel is likely the better option, and that rig your looking at wont be bad IF you can add a 2nd ram kit......or tweak it to have a K series chip.....if you just game a 3550k would probably be a better buy for you, bit of an OC and it would be faster then a locked chip, and should cost less.

K series chips are unlocked, like Black Box Amd chips.

but yeah the videocard you linked would be fine, IF you can get a gigabyte 3fan model those are better in my exp, but the 7970's a beast either way

due to perf under the beta drivers i just ordered 2 7870's (should get them monday) at the price newegg had them on clearance for, i couldnt pass them up. not with the price so close to a 7970 and perf that will in most cases be better
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Strykaar
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire 4870x2 2GB
Processor: Phenom II X4 840 @ 4GHZ
Mainboard:
Memory: Corsair XMS2 8GB @ 832MHZ
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair 750W
Default 09-03-2013, 00:34 | posts: 32

Wanted to reopen this old thread looking for some help myself. Recently got a 4870x2 from a buddy for real cheap, it was a major upgrade from my old 9600gso, or so I thought. In the case of games like Max Payne 3, Grid 2, etc, I'm getting excellent performance. But when it comes to wow, this card just stinks.

On my backup system, Phenom II x2 550 @ 3.4ghz 4gb DDR2 800, Ultra 450W psu, Palit 9600GSO 768MB DDR3, I can max wow at 1280x1024 except for shadows at good and get 60fps pretty much solid.

On my current rig, Phenom II x4 840 @ 4.0ghz 8gb DDR2 800, Corsair 750W, Sapphire 4870x2 I can barely keep my head above 40fps @ 1920x1080 all Ultra. I've tried many drivers, crossfire is engaging, but I'm only seeing about 50% utilization across gpus. The weird thing is when I disable crossfire, you'd think I'd still be kicking the 9600gso around see as how 4870>9600gso, but I'm getting like 20-30 fps. Something definitely isn't right here and I just can't figure it out.

I've tried kevs 11.12 and 13.1 reloaded, currently trying dellon's 12.11 and it's all pretty much the same story. Any thoughts?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#16)
Strykaar
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire 4870x2 2GB
Processor: Phenom II X4 840 @ 4GHZ
Mainboard:
Memory: Corsair XMS2 8GB @ 832MHZ
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair 750W
Default 09-03-2013, 00:36 | posts: 32

Another thing I forget to add, I've ran the game in dx9 and dx11 and get the same exact fps. The only difference is more gpu utilization in dx11 (about 65%) but again, same fps as dx9.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
airbud7
Ancient Guru
 
airbud7's Avatar
 
Videocard: HIS HD 6870
Processor: I3-2120
Mainboard: ASRock H61icafe
Memory: 8GB G.SKILL DDR3 1333
Soundcard: Xonar DX
PSU: PC Power&Cooling S61EPS
Default 09-03-2013, 16:37 | posts: 2,883 | Location: Evans Ga,USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strykaar View Post
Another thing I forget to add, I've ran the game in dx9 and dx11 and get the same exact fps. The only difference is more gpu utilization in dx11 (about 65%) but again, same fps as dx9.

DX11 on a 4870x2 ???
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 2500k @ 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3
Memory: 8GB Patriot Signature
Soundcard: Asus Xonar DG
PSU: Tt Toughpower XT 775W
Default 09-03-2013, 16:40 | posts: 4,087 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by airbud7 View Post
DX11 on a 4870x2 ???
I think he means DX10.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
dellon132
Maha Guru
 
Videocard: HD 5570 1 GB DDR3
Processor: Intel E2180 3.2Ghz
Mainboard: Asrock
Memory: 3GB DDR2
Soundcard:
PSU: 450 Watt Power Supply
Default 09-05-2013, 05:16 | posts: 1,866

Well a good thing to do when Upgrading to a New Graphic Card is make sure both Graphic Cards are running on a Freshly installed OS, or by using a Capable Driver Cleaner such as the one in this LINK to remove Previously installed Driver as they can cause performance issues and other possible bugs. Next would be to make sure both Cards are utilizing PCI Express x16 (it should not be utilizing anything below that level.)

Other Thoughts
If you are using my driver I recommend make use of the Dx9 Switcher as it does contains Performance Switchers so Users can change the level at which the driver Performs. After Using Wagnard's Tool to Clean up Nvidia Drivers you can then proceed Using the included Driver and Package Cleaner in the Dx9 Switcher Folder. Or you can continue using Wagnard's Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) to clean up your AMD Driver's prior to every new Driver installation to prevent possible bug's of installing drivers on top of another driver.

Note: All Performance Switchers are Permanently Applied so if you want
restore the driver back to your default Performance then you would need to use the Default Switcher. Other Switcher's such as the CrossFire Switcher along with the Flash Player Switcher can be either Enable or Disabled.

Last edited by dellon132; 09-05-2013 at 05:24.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
Strykaar
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire 4870x2 2GB
Processor: Phenom II X4 840 @ 4GHZ
Mainboard:
Memory: Corsair XMS2 8GB @ 832MHZ
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair 750W
Default 09-05-2013, 06:10 | posts: 32

Alright Dellon, I'll give it a shot and report back tomorrow.

And I did mean Directx11 as that is the option in WoW. The 4xxx series will run the dx11 code it'll just shed features specific to dx11 and default to 10.1 features.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
Strykaar
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire 4870x2 2GB
Processor: Phenom II X4 840 @ 4GHZ
Mainboard:
Memory: Corsair XMS2 8GB @ 832MHZ
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair 750W
Default 09-05-2013, 06:11 | posts: 32

Also meant to mention that this is on a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
dellon132
Maha Guru
 
Videocard: HD 5570 1 GB DDR3
Processor: Intel E2180 3.2Ghz
Mainboard: Asrock
Memory: 3GB DDR2
Soundcard:
PSU: 450 Watt Power Supply
Default 09-05-2013, 06:48 | posts: 1,866

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strykaar View Post
On my backup system, Phenom II x2 550 @ 3.4ghz 4gb DDR2 800, Ultra 450W psu, Palit 9600GSO 768MB DDR3, I can max wow at 1280x1024 except for shadows at good and get 60fps pretty much solid.

On my current rig, Phenom II x4 840 @ 4.0ghz 8gb DDR2 800, Corsair 750W, Sapphire 4870x2 I can barely keep my head above 40fps @ 1920x1080 all Ultra.

I've tried kevs 11.12 and 13.1 reloaded, currently trying dellon's 12.11 and it's all pretty much the same story. Any thoughts?
Another thing to look at is, How you compare a previous Graphic Card with a new Graphic Card. For example your 9600GSO and HD 4870x2 are compared using different settings thus your performance results turns out to be lower than expected because One GPU is max out on Ultra Settings while the other is not. All settings need to be setup exactly the same way to know whether or not your newly Graphic Card actually performs better than your previously used Graphic Card. Therefore your HD 4870x2 Should not be on Ultra Settings. Instead it needs to be setup to play games on the same resolution and also on the same graphic settings for you to see a performance improvement.

However this is not the case with your current setup as your current resolution of 1920x1080 is overkill when compared to the previously used "1280x1024."

Other Thoughts
Resolution alone can greatly hinder in game performance. Also it's recommended to turn up the shadows to Ultra only if shadows set on low settings makes the game look poor. My reason for saying this is simply because maxing out the shadows are probably something you don't want to do if you are constantly concerned about performance as shadows is another thing that reduces performance, so you might want to dumb down these two settings to match your previous 9600GSO Settings. Only then will you be able to see difference in performance when Testing both 9600GSO and a Single or Multiple HD 4890.

Last edited by dellon132; 09-05-2013 at 12:14.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
Strykaar
Newbie
 
Videocard: Sapphire 4870x2 2GB
Processor: Phenom II X4 840 @ 4GHZ
Mainboard:
Memory: Corsair XMS2 8GB @ 832MHZ
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair 750W
Default 09-05-2013, 16:18 | posts: 32

After trying the performance switchers and doing some testing I'm seeing some positive improvement. Basically at this area in Ashenvale I'm seeing this:

Crossfire ON: 52 fps 38-45% gpu use
Crossfire OFF 55 fps 95-98% gpu use

So I believe it's now coming down to a negative scaling issue.
I suppose I'm going to have to go through a myriad of drivers/profiles and see which one offers up the best scaling for this game.

The only difference right now between my system and the old system in the in-game settings is the resolution. 1280x1024 is pretty much the sweet spot for the 9600gso, and IMO the 4870x2 should be killing it even at 1920x1080. Dropping down to 1280x1024 I do get slightly better performance, but nowhere near what you would expect between the two cards.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
dellon132
Maha Guru
 
Videocard: HD 5570 1 GB DDR3
Processor: Intel E2180 3.2Ghz
Mainboard: Asrock
Memory: 3GB DDR2
Soundcard:
PSU: 450 Watt Power Supply
Default 09-05-2013, 17:16 | posts: 1,866

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strykaar View Post
After trying the performance switchers and doing some testing I'm seeing some positive improvement. Basically at this area in Ashenvale I'm seeing this:

Crossfire ON: 52 fps 38-45% gpu use
Crossfire OFF 55 fps 95-98% gpu use

So I believe it's now coming down to a negative scaling issue.
I suppose I'm going to have to go through a myriad of drivers/profiles and see which one offers up the best scaling for this game.

The only difference right now between my system and the old system in the in-game settings is the resolution. 1280x1024 is pretty much the sweet spot for the 9600gso, and IMO the 4870x2 should be killing it even at 1920x1080. Dropping down to 1280x1024 I do get slightly better performance, but nowhere near what you would expect between the two cards.
Ahh I also recommend removing V-Sync if you have not already done so as it's possible your max achievable FPS is being limited. (While V-Sync may be necessary (to for)corrected (to or for some, meaning not quite sure how exactly it's utilized on Crossfire Setup) Crossfire Users to prevent or reduce negative scaling it's not necessary for a single Gpu Graphic Card unless performance lack smoothness.

Other Thoughts
Here is some links. CPU Power also determines performance.....( WoW may be a game that requires just that even when paired with two capable GPU's.)
However I do find it weird that your Crossfire Setup is not displaying 100% Usage. Therefore you may want to give Radeon Pro a try.
http://www.logicalincrements.com/games/wow/
http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/...fps-games.html

Last edited by dellon132; 09-05-2013 at 19:33.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
yasamoka
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 7970CF @ Qnix 1440p 110Hz
Processor: i7 930
Mainboard: ASUS P6X58D Premium
Memory: 6GB Corsair Dominators
Soundcard: Audio-GD NFB-11.32 +DT880
PSU: CM Silent Pro Hybrid 1300
Default 09-05-2013, 17:48 | posts: 3,154 | Location: Lebanon

How can VSync be necessary for CrossFire to reduce negative scaling?
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2014, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.