Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > General Chat > Frontpage news
Frontpage news Perhaps you have some news to report or want to check out the latest Guru3D headlines and comment ? Check it in here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
MSI GeForce GTX 660M in GE60 and GE70 Gaming Notebooks
Old
  (#1)
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
 
Hilbert Hagedoorn's Avatar
 
Videocard: AMD | NVIDIA
Processor: Core i7 2600K
Mainboard: P67
Memory: 8GB
Soundcard: X-Fi - GigaWorks 7.1
PSU: 1200 Watt
Default MSI GeForce GTX 660M in GE60 and GE70 Gaming Notebooks - 09-22-2012, 08:42 | posts: 16,990 | Location: Guru3D testlab

The MSI’s GE70 and GE60 are serious gaming laptops. To meet your need for speed, MSI continues to roll out gaming notebooks with ever more impressive performance to price ratios.*The powerfu...

MSI GeForce GTX 660M in GE60 and GE70 Gaming Notebooks
   
Reply With Quote
 
Good laptops...but graphics card not as impressive as mentioned in article
Old
  (#2)
PunisherZA
Newbie
 
Videocard: AMD Radeon HD7970M
Processor: Intel Core i7 3610QM
Mainboard:
Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600Mhz
Soundcard: Creative SB Recon3Di
PSU: N/A
Default Good laptops...but graphics card not as impressive as mentioned in article - 09-22-2012, 09:46 | posts: 2

The MSI range of laptops are pretty good. They look pretty slick and come with some nice features. The refreshed GE60 and GE70 laptops are good gaming laptops, however, the Geforce GTX660M will not be able to play current games at Full HD resolutions and max IQ settings. If you're able to fork out abit more cash, I would strongly recommend looking at laptops that come with AMD's Radeon HD7970M or Nvidia's Geforce GTX680M (which is more expensive than the latter). Both of these flagship cards are great for full HD laptop gaming and offer a truly amazing experience. These cards are capable of achieving framerates that we previously unheard of in terms of laptop gaming. You can play practically any game at max settings in 1920x1080 (even with AA) at playable framerates.

However, if you don't mind gaming at HD (1366x768) resolutions, then the Geforce GTX660M would not be a bad card to opt for.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Vxheous
Maha Guru
 
Vxheous's Avatar
 
Videocard: EVGA GeForce GTX 570
Processor: i5 3570K @ 4.4Ghz 1.265V
Mainboard: Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe
Memory: Kingston HyperX 1600 8GB
Soundcard: Logitech G35 7.1Headphone
PSU: OCZ GameXstream 850W
Default 09-22-2012, 20:39 | posts: 1,085 | Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

I play all my games at 1920x1080 on my Asus G74, and that's only a GTX 560M. Only thing I don't turn on is AA, so really, no big deal. You don't have to drop down to 1366x768...ever.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
PunisherZA
Newbie
 
Videocard: AMD Radeon HD7970M
Processor: Intel Core i7 3610QM
Mainboard:
Memory: 16 GB DDR3 1600Mhz
Soundcard: Creative SB Recon3Di
PSU: N/A
Default 09-27-2012, 19:21 | posts: 2

@Vxheous

Dude, you can't play demanding games like Battlefield 3 or Crysis 2 at 1920x1080 and at MAX settings with an Nvidia Geforce GTX560M - regardless of AA. The card struggles to maintain 30 FPS in these titles. I know, because I had the GTX560M on my previous ASUS laptop.


The GTX680M and Radeon HD7970M are ALOT faster than the previous generation GTX560M and Radeon HD6970M.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#5)
Agonist
Master Guru
 
Agonist's Avatar
 
Videocard: HiS 5770 GT 520 Physx
Processor: Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.44v H50
Mainboard: MSI P35 Neo2
Memory: AMP-X DDR2 800 5.6GB
Soundcard: XFI 7.1/Logitech X540 5.1
PSU: OCZ Fatal1ty 550w
Default 09-27-2012, 19:39 | posts: 605 | Location: Tennessee

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunisherZA View Post
@Vxheous

Dude, you can't play demanding games like Battlefield 3 or Crysis 2 at 1920x1080 and at MAX settings with an Nvidia Geforce GTX560M - regardless of AA. The card struggles to maintain 30 FPS in these titles. I know, because I had the GTX560M on my previous ASUS laptop.


The GTX680M and Radeon HD7970M are ALOT faster than the previous generation GTX560M and Radeon HD6970M.
I dont see anywhere he said that he runs max settings. He could be just like I am, high settings and 1920x1080 res with good framerate and Im happy.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
k1net1cs
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: Radeon HD 5650m (550/800)
Processor: Intel Core i5-520M 2.4GHz
Mainboard: Sony VAIO VPCEA16FG
Memory: 2x4GB CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9
Soundcard: ASUS Xonar U3
PSU: n/a
Default 09-27-2012, 23:52 | posts: 3,328

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunisherZA View Post
If you're able to fork out abit more cash, I would strongly recommend looking at laptops that come with AMD's Radeon HD7970M or Nvidia's Geforce GTX680M (which is more expensive than the latter).
Did you mean 'former', or is a GTX680M is more expensive than...itself?




Interested in folding with fellow gurus? Click here to get you started!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Lane
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
Processor: I7 2600K - EK SupremeHF
Mainboard: Gigabyte P67A-UD7 B3
Memory: HyperX Predator 2400mhz
Soundcard: X-FI Titanium HD + SP2500
PSU: TT XT 875W
Default 09-28-2012, 01:06 | posts: 4,878 | Location: Switzerland

At the same time, the GTX660M = GTX580M ... Its not a Kepler card. ( 384CC )
( the only thing change is the clock speed of memory and core ( and not by so much )

The only new one is the GTX680M if i dont do a mistake (1344CC ).

Last edited by Lane; 09-28-2012 at 01:14.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
strowdmedsk
Newbie
 
Videocard: beas
Processor: amd
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: asd
Default 09-28-2012, 02:02 | posts: 1

I know, the game isn't released yet
[img]http://www.**********/********0.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.**********/********1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.**********/********2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.**********/********3.jpg[/img]
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
scatman839
Ancient Guru
 
scatman839's Avatar
 
Videocard: 7970m, UE46D5000
Processor: i7 3610QM
Mainboard: Intel HM77
Memory: 8GB DDR3
Soundcard: Via HD, x-530
PSU: 180w
Default 09-28-2012, 03:08 | posts: 8,751 | Location: Dundee, Scotland

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane View Post
At the same time, the GTX660M = GTX580M ... Its not a Kepler card. ( 384CC )
( the only thing change is the clock speed of memory and core ( and not by so much )

The only new one is the GTX680M if i dont do a mistake (1344CC ).
gtx 675m is a 580m

660m is a new card.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Chillin
Ancient Guru
 
Chillin's Avatar
 
Videocard: Gigabyte GTX 560 930/2300
Processor: i5-2500K@4.4GHz 1.2v H60
Mainboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4
Memory: G.Skill 2X4GB DDR3-1600
Soundcard: X-Fi XtremeGamer+Z506 5.1
PSU: Corsair TX 750w v2
Default 09-28-2012, 03:17 | posts: 5,904 | Location: Chilling

Looks horrid, I wouldn't buy this laptop just based on looks alone.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#11)
Lane
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
Processor: I7 2600K - EK SupremeHF
Mainboard: Gigabyte P67A-UD7 B3
Memory: HyperX Predator 2400mhz
Soundcard: X-FI Titanium HD + SP2500
PSU: TT XT 875W
Default 09-28-2012, 08:17 | posts: 4,878 | Location: Switzerland

Quote:
Originally Posted by scatman839 View Post
gtx 675m is a 580m

660m is a new card.
Hé hé you are right... the 384 CC have put me in error with the 580M..

So performance around 640 level .. not really a gamer card. ( even the GDDR5 version with 50mhz more should be faster )
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
scatman839
Ancient Guru
 
scatman839's Avatar
 
Videocard: 7970m, UE46D5000
Processor: i7 3610QM
Mainboard: Intel HM77
Memory: 8GB DDR3
Soundcard: Via HD, x-530
PSU: 180w
Default 09-28-2012, 08:40 | posts: 8,751 | Location: Dundee, Scotland

It's mostly similar to the 640m sure, but performance is going to be a fair amount higher.

But still, nothing compared to the 7970m or the 680m.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Lane
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
Processor: I7 2600K - EK SupremeHF
Mainboard: Gigabyte P67A-UD7 B3
Memory: HyperX Predator 2400mhz
Soundcard: X-FI Titanium HD + SP2500
PSU: TT XT 875W
Default 09-28-2012, 09:27 | posts: 4,878 | Location: Switzerland

Quote:
Originally Posted by scatman839 View Post
It's mostly similar to the 640m sure, but performance is going to be a fair amount higher.

But still, nothing compared to the 7970m or the 680m.
I dont expect anything more of the GT 640 desktop. ( well maybe a bit more valuable with GDDR5 on the notebook version ).

Performance should not even match a GTS 450.

Last edited by Lane; 09-28-2012 at 09:33.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
scatman839
Ancient Guru
 
scatman839's Avatar
 
Videocard: 7970m, UE46D5000
Processor: i7 3610QM
Mainboard: Intel HM77
Memory: 8GB DDR3
Soundcard: Via HD, x-530
PSU: 180w
Default 09-28-2012, 10:07 | posts: 8,751 | Location: Dundee, Scotland

Oh wait yes, you were talking about the 640 desktop card, yeah it would probably equal that.

notebookcheck maintains a standing list of mobile gpu rankings, and occasionally throws in desktop cards for a rought estimate, it pins the 660m just below the 550 ti, above the 450.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2012, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.