Unigine DirectX 11 Benchmark - Page 2

YuKsS · 10-24-2009, 08:21 | posts: 1,409 | Location: Venezuela

ok guys. in default mode, dx11 is selected..and also tessallation, but my cards dont support this feature.. so, if i let it "enable" the bench will automatically run in dx10 ? (without tessallation )

defaults settings - SLI disable / defaults settings - SLI disable - tessallation disable

--------------------------------------------------------------

defaults settings - SLI enable / defaults settings - SLI enable - tessallation disable

--------------------------------------------------------------

DEFFINATLY the feature "tessallation" is somehow "working or helping" in the results in nvidia cards.. here is a results by selecting defaults setting in dx10

As you see, is pretty much the same like defaults setting/dx11/tess disable

ps. so as i see, in dx11 by enable tessallation delivers more fps than disable it, and my cards don´t support it.. so wtf..

ps. i also note the only one of my core were at 100% the other at 40% max

ps. yeah i know about the cpu bottelneck, but my new PII 720 x3 arrives next week..

Squall Leonhart · 10-24-2009, 10:06 | posts: 1,331 | Location: Australia

it will run in Dx11 mode, without tesselation. Dx11 mode is mostly Dx10 anyway.

anyway mate, theres a +/- 5% error margin with FPS. the difference between tesselation on and off is within it.

PhantomCracking · 10-24-2009, 18:53 | posts: 473 | Location: Tennessee

For DX11 Tessellation is enabled.

First three are with 4xAA 16xAF, last two are No AA 4xAF. (Refused to launch in DX9 without AA and 4xAF.)

EDIT: ..Here, Lemme' throw in one more, at a ridiculously low resolution.

hirmak · 10-24-2009, 23:25 | posts: 324

DX10

DX11

nvlddmkm · 10-25-2009, 01:11 | posts: 4,253 | Location: Indiana

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS: 78.5
Scores: 1977

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz
CPU flags: 3937MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 8.16.11.9107 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1024x768 fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

nvlddmkm · 10-25-2009, 01:17 | posts: 4,253 | Location: Indiana

DX 10

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS: 81.4
Scores: 2051

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows Vista (build 6002, Service Pack 2) 32bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz
CPU flags: 3937MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 8.16.11.9107 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d10
Mode: 1024x768 fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

BetA · 10-25-2009, 01:38 | posts: 3,375 | Location: somewhere behind the Milky Way

heres mine!!

1280 x 1024 it is.....and my driver settings are as high as possible..AF forced thru driver panel @ 16x rest on very high , clamp, no vsync, etc etc

greetz Beta

Bodar · 10-25-2009, 02:15 | posts: 2,466 | Location: Austin

Posting a video soon.. Did multiple dx11 runs. from default to maxed settings using 3 5870's.. Find out in a sec.

nvlddmkm · 10-25-2009, 02:18 | posts: 4,253 | Location: Indiana

Oh goodness. Here it comes guys!

Bodar, I always wondered how your array of These would do with this benchmark.

Sorry, I meant your room full of These.

You are the man, man! *high fives*

Subaru Swift · *Last edited by Subaru Swift; 10-25-2009 at 05:35.*

well here is mine, bit low i thought for my rig !
what do you think ??.

i7, 920 cpu clocked to 3.60, asus p6t deluxe oc palm edition, 6GB corsair xms3 pc3-12800c9 running at 1604 MHz, zotac geforce gtx 280 amp 1024mb gpu Stock speeds, modded coolmaster master rc-1100 cosmos s case Water Cooled, enermax galaxy 1000w psu, along with 3x 500GB WD drives 1 for xp pro 64 bit sp2, 1 for vista ult, 1 for W7 ult ( action pack release ), & a 1TB WD drive for back ups & some music.
using a hp lp2475w 24" monitor.

=

Bodar · 10-25-2009, 06:45 | posts: 2,466 | Location: Austin

Here it is brothas!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCj4r2Gskqw

nvlddmkm · 10-25-2009, 07:03 | posts: 4,253 | Location: Indiana

Bodar, you're a D1ck! But I have a lot of respect for you and think you are cool in the same. Thanks, brother and *high five*!

Bodar · 10-25-2009, 07:07 | posts: 2,466 | Location: Austin

Thanks man! Hope you enjoyed the Benchies!

cheers

Infiniti3D · 10-25-2009, 17:43 | posts: 346 | Location: Netherlands

Great stuf Bodar! Impressive, i hope we see faster CPU's and better drivers soon so the 5800 series will show its real potential. I mean quad fire needs two Xenon's overclocked

PhantomCracking · 10-25-2009, 17:57 | posts: 473 | Location: Tennessee

Very nice, Bodar.

AgentJadeD · *Last edited by AgentJadeD; 10-26-2009 at 04:08.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nityo

broken pics

whats broken?

Heres default settings dx10

nvlddmkm · 10-26-2009, 06:55 | posts: 4,253 | Location: Indiana

Nothing is broken. You are doing well or either that really good at 'shopping'. Have you read through the whole thread?

AgentJadeD · 10-26-2009, 20:45 | posts: 101 | Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by nvlddmkm

Nothing is broken. You are doing well or either that really good at 'shopping'. Have you read through the whole thread?

'shopping'? Yes I have read through the whole thread. I'm posting mine to see the compared scores of a 5870 single vs GTX260 SLI...

putty · 10-26-2009, 23:19 | posts: 1,615 | Location: The Netherlands

ill be the first with a hd4850 haha

43.3 fps

all default settings dx11

Squall Leonhart · 10-27-2009, 03:12 | posts: 1,331 | Location: Australia

seems low for a 4850 :\

RKOver · 10-27-2009, 03:19 | posts: 1,928 | Location: Oakham, UK

Why run a low res?...

MM10X · 10-27-2009, 03:33 | posts: 4,052 | Location: Oakland, CA, US

Quote:

Originally Posted by RKOver

Why run a low res?...

its default for the benchmark.

apperently this thing loves SLI, or it loves my high clocks... getting 90FPS @ default, DX10 fullscreen... pic soon.

Squall Leonhart · 10-27-2009, 03:34 | posts: 1,331 | Location: Australia

i haven't actually done it at defaults yet

MM10X · *Last edited by MM10X; 10-27-2009 at 03:47.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squall Leonhart

i haven't actually done it at defaults yet

my PC eats this benchmark for breakfast. >: )

noticing about the same performance as crysis, yet in a more stable engine. though bigger areas like crysis would run worse, this bench has the best graphics i've seen in any engine like it.

default, directX 10,
FPS: 90.4
score: 2276

1680x1050, directX 10,
FPS: 51.6
score: 1299

not bad

Redemption80 · 10-27-2009, 03:47 | posts: 13,414 | Location: Glasgow

I didn't try it at defaults either, i ran it at 1920x1080, 8xAA, 16xAF.

Always like my benchmarks to be pretty

I wasn't that impressed with this, the DX11 effects are nice, but for me in DX10 i thought it was pretty average looking most of the time, and some of the time ruined by the overuse of the DOF blur.