182.67 WQHL out for vista 32&64 bit +XP 64 bit

BaneComes

http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/...howtopic=24270 supports qaudro cards,laptop,and desktop cards 6,7,8,9,200

Update, added Guru3D download mirrors:

GeForce ForceWare 182.67 Vista WHQL (32-bit)

GeForce ForceWare 182.67 Vista WHQL (64-bit)

GeForce ForceWare 182.67 XP WHQL (64-bit)

Pey · 06-14-2009, 21:17 | posts: 174 | Location: Argentina | User is Online

no xp32?

BaneComes · 06-14-2009, 21:24 | posts: 322 | Location: Earth | User is Offline

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pey

no xp32?

unfortunatly not

elrazor · 06-14-2009, 21:38 | posts: 330 | Location: Israel | User is Offline

FAKE! isnt official drivers.

BaneComes · 06-14-2009, 21:39 | posts: 322 | Location: Earth | User is Offline

Quote:

Originally Posted by elrazor

FAKE! isnt official drivers.

odd,i just installed them on my sons computer wich is vista 64bit and had no problems

Cybermancer · 06-14-2009, 21:46 | posts: 12,518 | Location: Cyberspace | User is Offline

Quote:

Originally Posted by elrazor

FAKE! isnt official drivers.

They might be not officially released from Nvidia, but that doesn't mean that they are fake, elrazor.

Btw: the internal release date is: 05/12/2009, 7.15.11.8267

ElementalDragon · 06-14-2009, 21:57 | posts: 6,306 | Location: Pennsylvania, USA | User is Offline

yeah.... elrazor, in case you haven't noticed, probably 8 out of 10 drivers seen aren't officially released by NVidia. They're usually leaked by a board partner such as eVGA or XFX, or just flat out leaked.

KevinK37 · 06-15-2009, 11:52 | posts: 8 | User is Offline

Are they going backwards in version numbers? They aren't even listed as beta on nvidia's website.

MAD5 · 06-15-2009, 12:13 | posts: 140 | Location: Argentina | User is Offline

Any improvements or fixes agaisnt 186.08?

N00bst3r · **Memory**: 4Gb Geil DDR2 - 4-4-4-12

Yeah im slightly confused at which drivers to use now. Im currently on 185.85 WHQL drivers and there are some 186.08 drivers on the Nvidia site, so installing a driver which has a lower number (182.67) seems just odd.

FrenchKiss · **Memory**: 4Go G.Skill HZ PC8500 5-5-5-15

Maybe 185.xx and 186.xx are optimized for GT200 GPU and 182.xx for G92&cie?

Legion666 · 06-15-2009, 13:27 | posts: 4 | Location: Frisia | User is Offline

if the 185.xx are optimized for GT200, they need fix the bug that says that my GTX275 only have 366MB ram...

on vista x64 en 7 x64

i shall try this one in the morning

Darkje · *Last edited by Darkje; 06-15-2009 at 14:41.*

Guess this is for people who like the 182 branch, an are now on 182.50 whql...? I liked those, so I'm gonne try these! tnx!

3dm06 seems okay, similar like before:
3DMark Score: 17769 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score: 8258
SM 3.0 Score: 8839
CPU Score: 3635

sava700 · 06-15-2009, 17:39 | posts: 3,491 | Location: ask me | User is Offline

very odd.. I'll stick with the 185 whql set I'm running... no sense in going backwards no matter what date they were stamped.

The General · 06-15-2009, 18:20 | posts: 1,298 | Location: Worldwide | User is Offline

BFG Nvidia 8400gs + 175.16 = superior performance.
Anything else , horrible lol. , anything around the 182.+185 drivers for some strange reason, my desktop is slightly cut off to the right and there is massive stuttering in games. So i just stick with the drivers from my disc that came with the card.

bokah · 06-15-2009, 19:35 | posts: 1,026 | User is Offline

182.46 been the most stable, shall see if these are good

Understandable · 06-15-2009, 19:57 | posts: 140 | Location: LAS VEGAS,NV | User is Online

Hmmm....says these drivers are not compatible.

Cybermancer · 06-15-2009, 20:05 | posts: 12,518 | Location: Cyberspace | User is Offline

Quote:

Originally Posted by Understandable

Hmmm....says these drivers are not compatible.

Even with the modded inf from LaptopVideo2Go?

Understandable · *Last edited by Understandable; 06-15-2009 at 20:53.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cybermancer

Even with the modded inf from LaptopVideo2Go?

LOL! I didnt read the description,im so used to just downloading. Ill give them another try.

I got higher scores in 3d Mark,as of now these are better than the 185 drivers for me. Gonna test drivers in Fallout 3.

foulone · **Memory**: 4 x 1gb corsair 4-4-4-12

Anyone else missing the nvidia control panel?

I can access it from the install dir (nvcplui.exe)

but not from a right click (as I usually do)

Vista x64

Razor3DC · 06-15-2009, 22:45 | posts: 81 | User is Offline

This is a Quadro-Release coming over windows update (directly from microsoft)...
Needs an INF-mod for working on consumer cards.

Microsoft Update-Catalog:
http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/...0DE%26DEV_061A
(the Quadro FX 3700 aka G92 Quadro is only an example ;-)

For sure... no WinXP 32-bit drivers.

Razor

XcroN · 06-16-2009, 01:10 | posts: 189 | Location: Israel | User is Offline

they work fine on GTX 285 but i won't use unoffical driver

bokah · 06-16-2009, 10:52 | posts: 1,026 | User is Offline

theres zipped inf files in package if u get "no supported devices found"

GenClaymore · 06-16-2009, 11:00 | posts: 2,801 | Location: Michigan,usa | User is Offline

WIth these drivers AA didnt work for me in alot of games. so I in up ditching these when those 190 drivers poped up. I hope AA works for me on those drivers.

KevinK37 · 06-16-2009, 13:07 | posts: 8 | User is Offline

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razor3DC

This is a Quadro-Release coming over windows update (directly from microsoft)...
Needs an INF-mod for working on consumer cards.

Microsoft Update-Catalog:
http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/...0DE%26DEV_061A
(the Quadro FX 3700 aka G92 Quadro is only an example ;-)

For sure... no WinXP 32-bit drivers.

Razor

I even looked under the Quadro's on the nvidia website, and didn't see it there either.