Official Call of Juarez DX10 Benchmark Post Results here

[becco]

Originally Posted by wedfighter

Crossfire test

TEST SETUP :
INTEL E2140 @ 3.15GHz
DFI Infinity 975X M2/G
ADATA EXTREME 1066+ 2GB
2 x HIS HD2900XT crossfire
FSP 1010w
Win Vista Ultimate

setting :


result :


not so bad at all...
FYI GF8800 Ultra with E6600@3.8GHz (single card) with same setting about 80% slower on CoJ

nice CF score @wedfighter
and nice oced E2140, I already knew that CoJ DX10 bench is not a CPU dependent, but going 3.17Ghz for E2140 is really cool ass!

[Titan7170]

Using Keldereric's settings and at my 24/7 ocs I get

9.5
73.3
31.6

[SABB69]

Originally Posted by wedfighter

Crossfire test

TEST SETUP :
INTEL E2140 @ 3.15GHz
DFI Infinity 975X M2/G
ADATA EXTREME 1066+ 2GB
2 x HIS HD2900XT crossfire
FSP 1010w
Win Vista Ultimate

setting :


result :


not so bad at all...
FYI GF8800 Ultra with E6600@3.8GHz (single card) with same setting about 80% slower on CoJ

so i see your 80% is more like 50%(but 2 cards and game opted for ATI not NVIDIA) and what is with the cut off pic of the 8800 score?

[MfA]

GTX460@(950/4600MHz), Q9650@4.00GHz, ForceWare 295.51(Q)
1920x1080, 4xSSAA
37,3 FPS


GTX460@(675/3600MHz), Q9650@4.00GHz, ForceWare 295.51(Q)
26,9 FPS

[ricardonuno1980]

I got results here down only at 2nd time running AMD X6 1055T@stock and GTX 480@stock-295.51beta-HQ but I don't like results at 1st time because I got stutter (lol!).

1024x768 - max setting except AA disabled:
min: 51.3
max: 160.0
AVG: 85.6
but the average GPU usage is only ~30% due to CPU bottlenecked. lol

1920x1080 - max setting with 4xMSAA:
min: 40.0
max: 135.1
AVG: 73.6

1920x1080 - max setting with 4xSSAA:
min: 18.3
max: 64.1
AVG: 43.5

I will test at GTX 480@OC to 760core/1520shader/1900mem for 1920x1080@4xSSAA only.

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

I will test at GTX 480@OC to 760core/1520shader/1900mem for 1920x1080@4xSSAA only.

1920x1080 - max setting with 4xSSAA:
min: 20.0
max: 67.6
AVG: 46.4

[ricardonuno1980]

My previous results are abnormal because BitDefender 2011 is fault (here) for affect heavily performance in games/demos.

My new results (normal performances) - 296.10WHQL (HQ)
1024x768 - max setting except AA disabled:
min: 80.2
max: 322.6
AVG: 141.7

1920x1080 - max setting with 4xMSAA:
min: 39.4
max: 183.5
AVG: 90.1

1920x1080 - max setting with 4xSSAA:
min: 18.6
max: 62.5
AVG: 44.2

[ricardonuno1980]

No any post yet despite no or +/- CPU bottlenecked and current GPU's to get improve much performance?

But I may get 1st position if any guy may fail test. eheheh!

[Gripen90]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

No any post yet despite no or +/- CPU bottlenecked and current GPU's to get improve much performance?

But I may get 1st position if any guy may fail test. eheheh!

This test I haven't tried with my 3x GTX580 and Core i7 870.

I did with try with 3x GTX470's where I averaged around 130 FPS with a Phenom II X6 1090T, and that was at 1920x1200, 4xMSAA and the highest settings.

I'll give the benchmark a go tonight.

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by Gripen90

This test I haven't tried with my 3x GTX580 and Core i7 870. (...) I'll give the benchmark a go tonight.

You didn't test the day before yesterday. You forgot that?! hahaha! lool! But or did you fail better performance on your current specs?

[Gripen90]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

You didn't test the day before yesterday. You forgot that?! hahaha! lool! But or did you fail better performance on your current specs?

The reason was, there was no motherboard or CPU in the system ! I sold it and was waiting for the new stuff

I did a run now, but didn't get a screenshot, but at 1920x1200, 4xMSAA, everything set to max the result was:
Minimum 69,7 FPS
Average 199,8FPS
Maximum 365 FPS

[ricardonuno1980]

Originally Posted by Gripen90

The reason was, there was no motherboard or CPU in the system ! I sold it and was waiting for the new stuff

I did a run now, but didn't get a screenshot, but at 1920x1200, 4xMSAA, everything set to max the result was:
Minimum 69,7 FPS
Average 199,8FPS
Maximum 365 FPS

ok but if you get some CPU bottlenecked then you change from 4xMSAA to 4xSSAA at same resolution.
press ctrl + print by Windows or press 2 keys simultaneously preferred on MSI Afterburner or eVGA Precision to take screenshot.

[Gripen90]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

ok but if you get some CPU bottlenecked then you change from 4xMSAA to 4xSSAA at same resolution.
press ctrl + print by Windows or press 2 keys simultaneously preffered on MSI Afterburner or eVGA Precision to take screenshot.

I'll have to run the test without Anti-Aliasing to determine if I hit a CPU bottleneck with MSAA active

[Gripen90]

Originally Posted by ricardonuno1980

ok but if you get some CPU bottlenecked then you change from 4xMSAA to 4xSSAA at same resolution.
press ctrl + print by Windows or press 2 keys simultaneously preferred on MSI Afterburner or eVGA Precision to take screenshot.

I found and old benchmark photo with Core i7 870 and 3x GTX 580's.
As you can see the old score was much much better.


However I did also notice that running the benchmark the cards weren't working at full load because usually at the end of the benchmark the fan rpm would rise to cool the working cards - and this wasn't happening when just getting the 199 FPS average score.

HOWEVER, if found a solution ! For some strange reason if I minimize the benchmark and then make it full screen again and restart the benchmark I get the "correct" score for the new setup, and I clearly hear the fan rpm rise and the cards are working at their max.
This is the correct score:

[ricardonuno1980]

ok but do you not try 4xSSAA (attention)?

[ricardonuno1980]

New i5-2500K@stock and GTX 480 w/ 296.10WHQL (HQ)
1024x768 - max setting except AA disabled:
min: 82.6
max: 512.8
AVG: 194.9

look difference to my previous result same resolution.