question

04-07-2001, 06:11 | posts: n/a

is there gonna be a radeon 2 cause id rather get that than a geforce3

Hilbert Hagedoorn · 04-07-2001, 11:00 | posts: 16,994 | Location: Guru3D testlab

Yeah, at the end of the summer. (Read my CeBIT 2001 report) <IMG SRC="smileys/wink.gif">

Y2A · 04-08-2001, 06:19 | posts: 564

okay whats up w/ this? Anything i can do to improve? System specs are in my signature. on 3dMark2000: 3840 
3dMark2001: 1920 
 
Anything I can do to improve this? I'm using the det 6.5 official drivers. Lol I'm the one needing help this time but I tried all the drivers and I really don't want to overclock so I'm kinda outta options and is anyone w/ sim. specs getting the same marks?

Dave · 04-08-2001, 12:47 | posts: 8,447 | Location: Lost in boxes

Y2A, those scores are very close to mine. But look at my video card. I would suggest your chip is your "problem" but with those scores it is working its ass off. 
 
3d mark 2000 3185 
3d mark 2001 1827 
directx 8 
 This message was edited by Bugsy on 08 Apr 2001 05:39 AM

04-09-2001, 03:10 | posts: n/a

WOW!! holy ****, your system should do much better!! 
 
My wife has: 
AMD T-Bird 800 @ 840 
128mb pc133 ram 
Geforce2 MX 
Fujitsu 20Gb UDMA 66/ ATA 100 hard drive. 
SB Live Value 
Running win 98 and an optimized swap file. 
 
and she scores: 
 
3DMark2000 - 6001 
3DMark2001 - 3029 
 
I have: 
 
AMD T-Bird 1.1Ghz @ 1155 
256mb pc133 ram 
Radeon 64mb DDR 
Fujitsu 20Gb UDMA 66/ ATA 100 hard drive. 
SB Live Value 
Running win 98 and an optimised swap file. 
 
and I get: 
 
3DMark2000 - 7398 
3DMark2001 - 3341 
 
I know they're not the best but if you want more info on how I get those scores, email me 
 
egeorge1@home.com 
 
And if you believe I'm ****ing with you, go to Madonion.com and do a search using the above email address. 
 
 
 This message was edited by Methos on 08 Apr 2001 08:39 PM

04-15-2001, 23:22 | posts: n/a

id rather get a Geforce3 cause if i get one im gonna go for one of the high end ones like the pro or ultra and get a 1.33Ghz Processor

Y2A · 04-17-2001, 04:39 | posts: 564

Actually my score beat yours... after retrying i got 2014 on 3dmark 2001 lol you suggested my chip sucked! IN YOUR FACE TBIRD!!! ECONOMIC PROCESSORS 4 EVER!!!!! BUAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!

Y2A · 04-17-2001, 04:42 | posts: 564

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Methos: 
WOW!! holy ****, your system should do much better!! 
My wife has: 
AMD T-Bird 800 @ 840 
128mb pc133 ram 
Geforce2 MX 
Fujitsu 20Gb UDMA 66/ ATA 100 hard drive. 
SB Live Value 
Running win 98 and an optimized swap file. 
and she scores: 
3DMark2000 - 6001 
3DMark2001 - 3029 
B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> 
Lol um... she mighta scored that much when she set it to the lowest setings... there is no way in hell she coulda hit that... NO WAY IN HELL EVEN W/ OVERCLOCKING THE CARD AND THE CHIP....

04-17-2001, 18:29 | posts: n/a

Not everything was set to min,her's the resolution settings I used: 
Resolution 800x600 16bit 
Texture Format Compressed 
FSAA Disabled 
 
First log in to Madonion.com and then click this link to see my benchmark. 
 
or just do a search and compare using my email address 
 
egeorge1@home.com 
 
<A HREF="http://gamershq.madonion.com/products/orb/?include_page=publish_search.shtml¤t_chipsetid=63¤ t_cpuid=27¤t_resolution=800¤t_bitdepth=16¤t_cpuspe ed=1150¤t2001_chipsetid=64¤t2001_cpuid=27¤t2001_re solution=800¤t_bitdepth=16¤t2001_bitdepth=16¤t2001 _cpuspeed=841¤t2001_FSAA=1¤t2001_textureformat=64& project_type=6&cpuid=0&cpuspeed_from=&cpuspeed_to= &chipsetid=0&uscreenwidth=0&bitdepth=0&texture_for mat=0&fsaa=0&score_from=&score_to=&email=egeorge1@ home.com" TARGET=_blank>My benchmark</A> This message was edited by Methos on 17 Apr 2001 11:19 AM