New GPU Time (Nearly): 390 or Fury?

Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon' started by BLEH!, Aug 20, 2015.

  1. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    423
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    Hey Gurus

    It's about time I got a new GPU, given both my 7970s are now officially dead (but not yet buried on eBay for spares). I'm thinking 390X or Fury, but which to go for? Gaming at 2560 x 1440. I'm staying with team red, so please don't suggest nVidia. Sticking with the core of my current rig as it's still fast enough at 4 GHz (980X + Asus P6T7 WS and 12 GB 2 GHz DDR3) for the interim.

    Ideas please? Preferably want something quiet, factory OCed not essential, but cool and minimal noise, preferably quite futureproof, too.

    Ta

    BLEH!
     
  2. Fender178

    Fender178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,194
    Likes Received:
    213
    GPU:
    GTX 1070 | GTX 1060
    I would go with the Fury because of the HBM and the new architecture and it would be more future proof over the 390X.
     
  3. Barry J

    Barry J Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes Received:
    152
    GPU:
    RTX2080 TRIO Super
    I agree go for a fury it is a new GPU the 390x is a re spin product
     
  4. Screwdriver

    Screwdriver Guest

    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X
    I'd do the Fury.....390x is a great card, but I am sure all future new Radeons will be HBM based...You will probably wishing you did.
     

  5. Deathchild

    Deathchild Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,969
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    -
    390x pointless, fury / 980 ti is the way to go. Though right now 980 ti seems the best choice given its value.
     
  6. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    15,754
    Likes Received:
    9,647
    GPU:
    4090@H2O
    Fury any day over a 390X, if the budget works.
     
  7. thesmokingman

    thesmokingman Guest

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 6950
    Fury + DX12 looks to be a solid plan.
     
  8. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    1,096
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    Another vote for the Fury, ive got 2 of the Sapphire Tri-Xs (i gave up on the FuryXs due to the pump whine, sent 2x back for it, was horrendous), and they are whisper quiet, and the temps are great, both only go between 70/71 and 77, which is cooler than my single MSI Gaming 290X was, as that hit around 85/86, odd game got it to 88, and it was also louder than these 2 :)
     
  9. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    423
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    Sounds pretty good, what case are you running?

    My HAF-X shouldn't have a problem getting rid of the heat, but all of my previous GPUS have been blower types, dumping the heat out the back.
     
  10. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,146
    Likes Received:
    1,096
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    Yeah be fine that case, ive got an NZXT Phantom 820.
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2015

  11. Alessio1989

    Alessio1989 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,952
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    GPU:
    .
    The cheaper one, not such big deal in favour of a 4GB GCN 1.2...
     
  12. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    423
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    Sapphire one seems like the one to go for, Asus being noisier and all that.
     
  13. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    Regular fury is about as fast as a 980 non ti at around 1500, maybe you should go for the fury x instead. That fury was pitted against the regular 980 in reviews.
     
  14. nhlkoho

    nhlkoho Guest

    Messages:
    7,754
    Likes Received:
    366
    GPU:
    RTX 2080ti FE
    If you're sticking with AMD I would get neither until HBM v2 is out.
     
  15. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Guest

    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    3,371
    GPU:
    6900XT+AW@240Hz
    Those are bad dreams. If fury X had HBM2, it would be 15% faster at stock as that's performance lost due to memory bandwidth limitation.
    Waiting year to get 15% more is pointless.

    And with Fury (non X) he may be actually able to increase HBM voltage and do solid OC down the road, getting that lost performance anyway.

    Who knows, maybe there will be way to bump Vmem by 50mV even for Fury X in time.
     

  16. theoneofgod

    theoneofgod Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,677
    Likes Received:
    287
    GPU:
    RX 580 8GB
    I'm sure they meant wait for more VRAM with HBM2, not speed.
     
  17. Prefix

    Prefix Member Guru

    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    18
    GPU:
    Sapphire R7 260X 2GB
    Maybe at 1080p at 1440p it destroys it infact the 390X is on par with the 980 @1440p.
     
  18. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    With a 980 at 1500mhz?
     
  19. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    423
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    I need a new card within the next month or so, not another year...

    Fury is probably the best option for 1440p, given I don't want an nV card ever again.
     
  20. OneB1t

    OneB1t Guest

    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 290X@R9 390X 1050/1325
    if you can get used 290(X) i say go for it and flash it with 390(X) bios
    performance difference between fury and 390 is 25% at 2560 x 1440

    then wait for 14nm products to came
     

Share This Page