GeForce GTX Titan review

And this is why I recommend the 7850:

 

It's irrelevant. Titan it's a pure enthusiast card, so price is not much of an issue for people who want the highest possible performance.

 

What would be the point of that it's not like 3 Titans are not enough

 

What a worthless overpriced piece of crap card this is and I'll tell you why. I can't F'ing afford it.:bang:

 

I can't wait for Anandtech to review this:

With titan's overclocking depending in temperature, it should be possible to push the card pretty damn high with the liquid cooling maintaining the temperature under 50° permanently. :roll:

 

If I knew that it could handle all future games at highest settings for next 5 years I would buy one. It would save me money as I tend to upgrade almost every year. Trouble is, that todays top cards are usually equalled or surpassed by much lower priced mid-range cards in 1 or 2 years. This incredible depreciation (in value and performance) is what makes it not worthy for me.

 

That 10K myth sure was funny , its available from varius gpu manufacturers, far more then I've expected according to Rich_Guy's Aria info

Gainward, Auss, Gigabyte, Zotac, Asus..

But sorry the price is a joke, not worth it.

 

I dont care for crysis series, I dont even like FPS games.

 

Well it's around the £830 mark in the UK which is just mental. Glad I bought my second 7970 from BLEH! this week. Getting more performance for a little over half the price (second hand)

Still would lurve one though. Looks soooooo sexy. Have to hand it to Nvidia they produced a beautiful card.

 

Please do a CPU scaling in the artical as well I've seen one review that showed the fx8350 walking all over the sandy-bridge CPU's.

 

No news on whether that "feature" can be disabled?

 

Then what are you doing here? If you are a retrogamer there should be no reason for you to read reviews of new enthusiast cards...

 

Oh gimmeabreak...

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/ this?

The only walking I see is that PII X4 965 at 3.4 GHz stomping all over the FX4300 at 3.8 GHz.

 

The fx8350 at stock has 10 fps on the 2500k stock thats 10 frames thats not walking all over a sandy bridge I don't know what is the only stock processor beating the $200 FX in that test is a $1000 CPU okay:3eyes:

BTW the 8350 ($200) beat the 3770k ($340) by 2fps both min and max the 965 be beat the 4300 by 1 fps in max only you sir are doing it wrong.

 

You're being delusional. Crysis 3 likes threads, a quad without HT will give it 4, an octocore will give it 8. Then it likes clocks. What I see is a QUAD 2500K at 3.3 close to already a HEXACORE 1100T at 3.3 and a HEXACORE FX6300. Don't tell me you don't know what happens next.

 

Someone who doesn't like fps games = retrogamer...mmmmkay

I've read a lot of stupid s*** today but this takes the cake. Good job.

 

First off the 8350 (8 threads 4.2Ghz boost) beat the 3770k(8 threads 3.9Ghz boost) by 2fps in min and max you said that only 1fps on max is destroying it so by your definition the 8350(8 threads) destroys the 3770k(8 threads) 3 times over.

 

what an awful card, maybe I`ll get one to run as a physics card. lol

 

Good performance, but for the price they want there are way better (and cheaper ) alternatives. I'm an nvidia guy myself since TNT 2, but at this point i would be looking at AMD, as their price/performance is way better. But for now of course, my 680 is more than enough for gaming @1080p.