GTX 670 Club / OCs / Benchies / etc etc...

[Loophole35]

Originally Posted by ---TK---

hey you get that Phoebus yet? maybe you can run heaven maxed on 1 670 and post your score. 602 seems a low score to me

Yes I got the Phoebus I'm currently enjoying the Sound City - Real to Reel album with it AMAZING will run a bench with one gpu now and post.

[Loophole35]

Originally Posted by johnny_cass

Hi is this score very low im using a single gtx 670 gigabyte windforce with a core 1267mhz mem 3516 max voltage and power target.

also i seem to be only getting an average of 23.6 fps and from reading i should be getting 45fps average.

Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0
FPS:
23.9
Score:
602
Min FPS:
11.8
Max FPS:
49.4
System
Platform:
Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit
CPU model:
AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor (3612MHz) x4
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 9.18.13.1407 (2047MB) x1


Settings
Render:
Direct3D11
Mode:
1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Preset
Custom
Quality
Ultra
Tessellation:
Extreme


Powered by UNIGINE Engine

Same settings as you this is what I got on one 670

[Loophole35]

and here is sli

[Subaru Swift]

I have a 670 now well I have had it for a couple of months so I better get bench making etc. & post in here.

[---TK---]

Originally Posted by Loophole35

and here is sli

I thought my score was bad, got 2053 but I used 8x aa
ran it at the same settings


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Loophole35]

^ yeah I did not see that maybe I should run them again. I've never really played around with Heaven. It's a beautiful benchmark looks much better than 3DMark.

[---TK---]

valley is one awsome looking bench, you arent far off my sli 680 score in heaven

[Loophole35]

Originally Posted by ---TK---

valley is one awsome looking bench, you arent far off my sli 680 score in heaven

Well the only difference between my config and yours is you have 2GB more VRAM per GPU and one more SMX unit per GPU. Wish I had that VRAM lol.

[Radical_53]

VRAM is nice to have, no question about that. Right before I got my 670 I thought a 570 or 580 would've been interesting too and so I tried one of the models with larger VRAM.
No matter what I did I couldn't find a way to let it show it's advantage somewhere.
For people using huge screens (or several) it's a good thing for sure but apart from this, the real-world difference shouldn't be too big.

[Loophole35]

I'm running three screens can't enable AA in some games as it uses more than 2GB VRAM.

[Radical_53]

Three screens, yes. What resolutions and which games?

[Loophole35]

Skyrim lol, had to drop my res and disable high res pack in Crysis 2, dropped down to x2 MSAA in BF3 of course Crysis3 and metro is unplayable at higher settings I just play that on one monitor.

[Radical_53]

Well ok, those games are typical examples I guess. All of them are already bad with a single full HD monitor ("full blown" at least with mods, full AA and so on).

[Loophole35]

Yeah I agree I'm not going to go out and sell my 670's to replace them with 4GB 680's just for those games.

[---TK---]

Originally Posted by Loophole35

Yeah I agree I'm not going to go out and sell my 670's to replace them with 4GB 680's just for those games.

you would benefit from 4gb 670 sli, you dont have to go with the much more expensive 680 4gb sli

[Loophole35]

I could but at this point it's not a big deal the games I currently play the most have no issues so I shall wait for a 384bit high end card that is not $1000 and sli it (I just can not justify that price).