Ashes of the Singularity Benchmarks

3770K and 7950. 16GB RAM at 2000MHz.

DX11

Spoiler

DX12

Spoiler

 

Is it slower under DX12 or am I reading wrong?

 

yea it does seem that way doesn't it.

Unless that 80+fps CPU reading is the new framerate.... in which case that is a massive increase but I am not sure.

EDIT:

Check out this benchmark of an I5 3570K + GTX 770 – 35.6 FPS INCREASE WITH DX12

http://*************/ashes-singularity-alpha-dx12-benchmark/

replace **** with w c c f t e c h (without spaces)

That is a 180+ increase in fps!! That is insane!

It seems to be a little all over the place though, as some AMD cards get 0.3fps increase or decrease and the same with Nvidia too.

It does seem to benefit more NON hyper threaded CPU's.

So maybe people, like my self, with a HT enabled CPU if we disable HT and try and run the benchmark again? It seems to like physical cores not logical... I could be wrong but worth a try.

 

All batches 16mln ;-)
And resolution is almost 2k (2k on my CRT = 2048:1536 86Hz) OMG its RTS
1920:1440 85Hz :banana:

Spoiler

 

That was CPU test mode, not full system test, the guy who did that, f*cked it up...

Edit:

It's faster, except normal batches.

 

I wasn't too impressed with the summary myself.

 

Well, you have a good cpu with a somewhat weaker gpu, AFAIK dx12 doesn't boost the performance in such a rig. On the other hand, I have a weak cpu with a somewhat better gpu, and got a nice little boost from dx12, especially under heavy load (doubled fps).

Default settings - dx11

Spoiler

dx12

Spoiler

 

Thanks. Have you done the CPU test?

 

Sure, although under dx11 it's the same, due to I'm cpu bound all of the time, also under dx12 it's similar as well, because my cpu is barely enough to feed my gpu.

Spoiler

 

Re-run the tests with my new Tweaks

Spoiler

Full GPU+CPU

1

2

3


CPU Only

1

2

3

I think is a Great score. My Tweaks Fully operational :nerd:

 

Good news for fx cpu owners, you will be able to play this game at 60 fps during battles! The ideal preset for my 290 on the latest build (v0.55) is medium and no AA.

Spoiler

 

nice so finally fixed for FX series?

 

I don't know what Oxide did. I thought v0.51 was insane with average 47 fps for my fx, but I don't know what to say about this.

 

i think also 6/8cores intel will have much better results now
it was not working as should on old versions

 

Also, it seems, oc for fx cpus matters a lot now. Some guy at the AOTS forum with another fx8350 (probably at factory settings) is doing only 60 fps, so your fx at 4.8 should do much better than mine.

 

ill try it later now messing with star wars DX12 but i was sure that something is not right in first version of this benchmark when fx-4xxx have same score as fx-8xxx

edit: just found i7-4690K@4.7ghz result
http://s22.postimg.org/pj5lhu8up/bench.png

well played AMD really looking forward for DX12

 

Well, that was v0.51, I'm not sure at the moment how much is the difference between that build and 0.55 on intel cpus. Unfortunately, the Founders at AOTS forum do not really deal with the benchmark currently, but as far as I know AOTS will enter into the Early Access stage in a few weeks, when Stardock will remove NDA.

Edit: Sorry, I was wrong, AOTS will be on Early Access on October 22.

Edit2: Yeah, I got confirmation, an fx8350 at stock is doing much less fps.

 

I don't see relevance comparing the results with DX11 because I think AMD didn't bother to optimize their cards for the DX11 mode. So I will only post DX12 results with CPU comparision. As you will see there is basically no difference between 1.9 and 4.5 GHz (except the CPU score ofc.).

Here are my results with the latest version:

i7 4790K + R9 Fury (unlocked to 60 CU and OC'ed to 1090 Mhz):

4C/8T - 1.9 GHz:



4C/8T - 4.5 Ghz:



Settings:

 

if you lower details then you see differences

 

Too bad I didn't take reference screenshot with 15.9.1 drivers. Anyway here's Fury X @1120/560MHz, 3770k @ 4.2GHz

Spoiler