Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Videocards > Benchmark Mayhem
Benchmark Mayhem This section is for you benchmark freaks. Wanna show off your 3D Mark scores with your brand new GTX 980 SLI or Radeon R9 290X Crossfire in that Intel Core i7 rig? Then this is your section!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#101)
Han2K
Master Guru
 
Han2K's Avatar
 
Videocard: MSI GTX1080 Gaming X
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7Ghz
Mainboard: ASUS P8P67 DELUXE
Memory: GSkill 16GB DDR3@2133 CL9
Soundcard: Xonar DGSI & HyperX Cloud
PSU: Corsair HX750
Default 07-15-2016, 23:11 | posts: 265 | Location: Valencia, Spain

Not bad at all.

   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#102)
newls1
Member Guru
 
Videocard: 2 x GTX 980Ti's in SLi
Processor: i7 5930@ 4.54GHz
Mainboard: Asus X99A-II
Memory: G.Skill 32GB @ DDR4 3256
Soundcard: Realtek 1150
PSU: eVGA 1200w P2 PSU
Default 07-15-2016, 23:18 | posts: 101 | Location: Atlanta

SSE has been with us since at least the PIII days.... His PhenomII has SSE
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#103)
Bardock
Newbie
 
Videocard: Saphire Tri-X R9 290X 4G
Processor: AMD Phenom IIx6 1075T@3,8
Mainboard: ASUS M5A99X EVO
Memory: 3x Kingston HyperX 4GB
Soundcard:
PSU: Coolermaster 700W
Default 07-15-2016, 23:22 | posts: 5 | Location: BiH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undying View Post
Lacking SSE support on Phenom CPU?
Yes! Just found it myself actually, but thanks for quick reply.

3DMark's in minimum requires 1.8Ghz DualCore CPU with SSSE3 support, and my Phenom does not have SSSE3 instruction support.

Thanks again tho.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#104)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 07-15-2016, 23:23 | posts: 9,241 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by newls1 View Post
SSE has been with us since at least the PIII days.... His PhenomII has SSE
His Phenom II is lacking SSE4 instructions. I've seen quite a few games not running at all becouse that problem so i thought there is a connection.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#105)
Agonist
Maha Guru
 
Agonist's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 Fury Nitro OC
Processor: i7 3930k@ 4.1 H100i
Mainboard: ASUS P9X79 PRO
Memory: HyperX 1866 16GB DDR3
Soundcard: Asus Xonar DXG X-540 5.1
PSU: OCZ Fata1ty 1000w
Default 07-16-2016, 00:07 | posts: 2,148 | Location: Tennessee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undying View Post
As you can see 280/280X perform similiar at the same clocks. Difference is within 5%.

We gonna need an upgrade man.
I have my 280 @ 1120/1400

Whats weird is I have no voltage options in Afterburner even though this is a black edition XFX 280.

Guess I need to make a bios for it.

I used to have a reference Sapphire 7950 boost with a custom bios @ 1300/1500.

Yes its time to snag up a $199 XFX 4GB RX 480 and use it ill high end vega drops.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#106)
jonerkinsella
Maha Guru
 
jonerkinsella's Avatar
 
Videocard: Saph 290 Trix OC.
Processor: 5930k
Mainboard: Asrock X99 EX4
Memory: 4x4gb Ballistix Elite
Soundcard: Gfx Hdmi and ob RT1150
PSU: Corsair AX1200i
Default 07-16-2016, 12:20 | posts: 1,857 | Location: IRELAND

3898 with my rig all at stock.

Not bad at all.
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/59072
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#107)
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
 
Redemption80's Avatar
 
Videocard: GALAX 970/ASUS 970 STRIX
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 PRO Intel P67
Memory: G.Skill RipJawsX 8GB
Soundcard: Nvidia - HDMI
PSU: Corsair GS800
Default 07-16-2016, 12:24 | posts: 17,522 | Location: Glasgow

Your graphics score is 7% faster than i am at stock and SLI disabled, while your CPU is 80% faster lol.

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/59072/spy/53924
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#108)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 07-16-2016, 13:54 | posts: 9,241 | Location: Serbia, NS

Maxwell cards really benefits from Async enabled :



Last edited by Undying; 07-16-2016 at 14:07.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#109)
Han2K
Master Guru
 
Han2K's Avatar
 
Videocard: MSI GTX1080 Gaming X
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7Ghz
Mainboard: ASUS P8P67 DELUXE
Memory: GSkill 16GB DDR3@2133 CL9
Soundcard: Xonar DGSI & HyperX Cloud
PSU: Corsair HX750
Default 07-16-2016, 16:13 | posts: 265 | Location: Valencia, Spain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undying View Post
Maxwell cards really benefits from Async enabled :
You can't deny that Maxwell doesn't support Async-Compute as it is stated. If not, how do you explain the performance drop?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#110)
GenClaymore
Ancient Guru
 
GenClaymore's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX 1080 FE @ 2100/5556
Processor: I7 3930k @ 4.3ghz
Mainboard: Asus X79 Sabertooth
Memory: G-skill 4x4GB DDR3-1600
Soundcard: SB ZXR + JBL305/R70x
PSU: Cosair RM850
Default 07-16-2016, 16:59 | posts: 5,871 | Location: Southfield,MI

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13312297
GTX 970 SLI FTW running at pre-oc speeds. I7 3930k @ 4.3ghz
3DMark score:6732
Graphics Score :7104
CPU core:5195
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#111)
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
 
Redemption80's Avatar
 
Videocard: GALAX 970/ASUS 970 STRIX
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 PRO Intel P67
Memory: G.Skill RipJawsX 8GB
Soundcard: Nvidia - HDMI
PSU: Corsair GS800
Default 07-16-2016, 17:29 | posts: 17,522 | Location: Glasgow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Han2K View Post
You can't deny that Maxwell doesn't support Async-Compute as it is stated. If not, how do you explain the performance drop?
I can't remember the exact wording, but think the Oxide dev explained that while Maxwell cards do have support for async compute, they are unable to use it and gain performance, if anything there is a risk of performance loss.

I just tried with and without, and i gained 50 on the graphics score by disabling async compute.
Nearly a year done the line, i'm sure some of us can give up on this every being a feature on Maxwell cards.

Not the end of the world though, performance is still great with this benchmark and competitive considering what i paid.

Just a pity DX12/Vulkan games are not this well optimised.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenClaymore View Post
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13312297
GTX 970 SLI FTW running at pre-oc speeds. I7 3930k @ 4.3ghz
3DMark score:6732
Graphics Score :7104
CPU core:5195
Not much between our two systems, just my CPU starting to show it's age.

3DMark score:6512
Graphics Score :7335
CPU core:3982

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/64011/spy/61196

Last edited by Redemption80; 07-16-2016 at 17:32.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#112)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 07-16-2016, 17:32 | posts: 9,241 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redemption80 View Post
Not the end of the world though, performance is still great with this benchmark and competitive considering what i paid.

Just a pity DX12/Vulkan games are not this well optimised.
Indeed. Maxwell cards are good performers overall. It's a shame that wont get any better at this point. Peak of performance and async as you see above, isnt helping at all.

Considering how Kepler cards are performing bad lately (Vulcan and DX12) Maxwell is still standing.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#113)
-Tj-
Ancient Guru
 
-Tj-'s Avatar
 
Videocard: ZOTAC GTX980Ti Amp!Omega
Processor: Intel i7 4770K OC 4.7GHz
Mainboard: ASUS Z87 Deluxe 2103
Memory: DDR3 G.skill 16GB 2400MHz
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium HD @Bose A5
PSU: Nitro88+ 650W 52A
Default 07-16-2016, 18:19 | posts: 13,543 | Location: Proxima \/82

Or just not enabled properly yet. Nv didnt say anything about it with r367 branch, so.. You can continue with your conspiracy theory.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#114)
seaplane pilot
Maha Guru
 
seaplane pilot's Avatar
 
Videocard: 2x GA-980TIXE/
Processor: 5930K/ FX4130
Mainboard: ASROCK X11/ GA-990FXA-UD5
Memory: 32GB GT/ 16GB Crucial
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: 1600 G2/ 1x AX1200i
Default 07-16-2016, 21:58 | posts: 1,292 | Location: Nebulas



   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#115)
cad cam man
Master Guru
 
Videocard: MSI GTX 970 Gaming 4G SLI
Processor: I7 4790K @ 4.7Ghz + H110
Mainboard: Asus Maximus VII Hero
Memory: DDR3 32Gb @ 2400Mhz
Soundcard: Asus xonar DX
PSU: Corsair AX1200 Gold Pro
Default 07-16-2016, 22:31 | posts: 568 | Location: Uk

The most this system can get is 7184 so not to shabby!

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13303389

ok new best!

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/286168

Last edited by cad cam man; 09-01-2016 at 18:42.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#116)
deathfrag
Master Guru
 
deathfrag's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 Fury Strix(Unlocked)
Processor: I7 4770K @4.2 H100i
Mainboard: Msi Z87/G45 Gaming
Memory: 16 GB 2133
Soundcard: ONBOARD
PSU: 800 Watt Aerocool
Default 07-17-2016, 00:32 | posts: 301 | Location: ALGERIA



http://i.imgur.com/02zqbVL.png

Last edited by deathfrag; 07-17-2016 at 23:43.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#117)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX-16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 07-17-2016, 03:25 | posts: 9,241 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by seaplane pilot View Post


 Click to show spoiler


So what happened there?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#118)
Hellraiser
Newbie
 
Videocard: GIGABYTE r9 290
Processor: Fx-8350 @ 4.1
Mainboard: ASRock 970 Extreme4
Memory: G.Skill 8gb+Kingston 2gb
Soundcard: Logitech 5.1
PSU: 1000w
Default 07-17-2016, 04:53 | posts: 17 | Location: Australia m8

SCORE
3 796 with AMD Radeon R9 290(1x) and AMD FX-8350
Graphics Score 3 924
CPU Score 3 204
3dmark.com/3dm/13336973
Worst motherboard on the planet ASRock 970 Extreme4
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#119)
robintson
Member Guru
 
robintson's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX980M@1261gpu5508vram
Processor: i74860HQ@3.57GHz
Mainboard: Asus_G751JY
Memory: 32GBDDR3_1600MHzCAS10_1T
Soundcard: Creative X-Fi HD USB
PSU: DeltaElectronicsADP-230EB
Default 07-17-2016, 09:20 | posts: 74

Driver: 368.81
GTX980M@1.2 GHz , i74860HQ

Time Spy Result: 3296
Graphics score: 3223
CPU Test: 3790



http://imgur.com/a/txXPP

Last edited by robintson; 07-17-2016 at 09:32.
   
Reply With Quote
messed up
Old
  (#120)
BrimStone101
Newbie
 
Videocard: 16 gig
Processor: intel
Mainboard:
Memory:
Soundcard:
PSU: 1200watt
Default messed up - 07-17-2016, 10:28 | posts: 39

well nothing changes.
http://steamcommunity.com/app/223850...8942110944664/


what he said was interesting.
Im not sure of any of it
If you guys made Time Spy and use Async Compute to overlap rendering
, you play right into Pascal's hand. It does not have real parallel execution but
it can fast context switch, with preemption and dynamic load balancing to
improve it's shader utilization if it's under used. At 1080 and 1440p, it is very
much likely not to be using 100% hence the very small gains. People find the
gains drop to almost zero at 4K due to all the shaders being utilized already.


If you guys had actually used a real parallel and multi-engine approach, you would see major gains across the
board for all GPUs capable of this on hardware. Regardless of whether it's a
low shader GPU like 380/X or even the new RX 480, which only have 2304
shaders vs Fury X 4096.

Last edited by BrimStone101; 07-17-2016 at 10:35.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#121)
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
 
Redemption80's Avatar
 
Videocard: GALAX 970/ASUS 970 STRIX
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 PRO Intel P67
Memory: G.Skill RipJawsX 8GB
Soundcard: Nvidia - HDMI
PSU: Corsair GS800
Default 07-17-2016, 10:49 | posts: 17,522 | Location: Glasgow

I'm not going to pretend to full understand the technical side, while also not wanting to parrot what I have brought up in the other thread, but what sort of major gains would people be seeing?

A rough % and an example of a game/benchmark that gets this sort of performance increase with async enabled.

Looking at scores from AMD hardware, this implementation of async compute is the fastest so far.

Why are people complaining?

Last edited by Redemption80; 07-17-2016 at 10:52.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#122)
Fox2232
Ancient Guru
 
Fox2232's Avatar
 
Videocard: Fury X - XL2420T(Z)@144Hz
Processor: i5-2500k@4.5GHz NH-D14
Mainboard: MSI Z68A-GD80[g3]
Memory: 4x4GB 1600MHz 9,9,8,20 1T
Soundcard: Essence ST / AKG K-701
PSU: FSP Gold series 750W
Default 07-17-2016, 11:05 | posts: 5,048 | Location: EU, CZ, Brno

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Tj- View Post
Or just not enabled properly yet. Nv didnt say anything about it with r367 branch, so.. You can continue with your conspiracy theory.
I would not worry about Maxwell and its async capabilities. nVidia may enable it once they are completely EOL and people would look at their performance/watt or performance/$ as so bad that they would not have resale value.

They may as well enable Async compute on GeForce 8800 GTX which for today's standard is actually just space heater.

What I mean by that is that enabling performance increasing feature at time people no longer care about given HW is pointless. So nVidia should act soon. I do not even remember how long it is since they promised that magical driver enablement.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#123)
nizzen
Master Guru
 
Videocard: 3x Asus Titan X EK water
Processor: 5960x
Mainboard: Asus RVE
Memory: G.Skill 3200 @ cl14
Soundcard:
PSU: 2x Antec HCP1300
Default 07-17-2016, 11:36 | posts: 286

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redemption80 View Post
I can't remember the exact wording, but think the Oxide dev explained that while Maxwell cards do have support for async compute, they are unable to use it and gain performance, if anything there is a risk of performance loss.

I just tried with and without, and i gained 50 on the graphics score by disabling async compute.
Nearly a year done the line, i'm sure some of us can give up on this every being a feature on Maxwell cards.

Not the end of the world though, performance is still great with this benchmark and competitive considering what i paid.

Just a pity DX12/Vulkan games are not this well optimised.



Not much between our two systems, just my CPU starting to show it's age.

3DMark score:6512
Graphics Score :7335
CPU core:3982

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/64011/spy/61196
Maxwell Overclock 40-50%, so it does not need Async shaders :p

Did a run with 2x 1080 gaming x with HB Bridge:

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/32439

13 187 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080(2x) and Intel Core i7-6900K
Graphics Score 13 955
CPU Score 10 055

Last edited by nizzen; 07-17-2016 at 11:38.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#124)
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
 
Redemption80's Avatar
 
Videocard: GALAX 970/ASUS 970 STRIX
Processor: i7-2600K @ 4.7ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 PRO Intel P67
Memory: G.Skill RipJawsX 8GB
Soundcard: Nvidia - HDMI
PSU: Corsair GS800
Default 07-17-2016, 12:20 | posts: 17,522 | Location: Glasgow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox2232 View Post
I would not worry about Maxwell and its async capabilities. nVidia may enable it once they are completely EOL and people would look at their performance/watt or performance/$ as so bad that they would not have resale value.

They may as well enable Async compute on GeForce 8800 GTX which for today's standard is actually just space heater.

What I mean by that is that enabling performance increasing feature at time people no longer care about given HW is pointless. So nVidia should act soon. I do not even remember how long it is since they promised that magical driver enablement.
I have August in my head, so thinking it must be getting close to a year.

If they couldn't do it when Maxwell was their top card, the incentive must be pretty much gone now.

nizzen, surely another 10% on top of that would be even better?
Saying that, I would rather get 10% more performance from an overclock than from something like async compute.

Edit: BTW, I'm using 10% as its the average for async, not what can be achieved with an oc.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#125)
kx11
Maha Guru
 
kx11's Avatar
 
Videocard: Titan X-Pascal
Processor: i7 6900k
Mainboard: ASUS Rampage V 10th ed.
Memory: Corsaire Dominator
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA 1000 g2
Default 07-17-2016, 19:31 | posts: 2,201 | Location: Qatar

still no challengers ?

meh
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2014, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.