Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Videocards > Benchmark Mayhem
Benchmark Mayhem This section is for you benchmark freaks. Wanna show off your 3D Mark scores with your brand new GTX 980 SLI or Radeon R9 290X Crossfire in that Intel Core i7 rig? Then this is your section!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#51)
aaronne
Newbie
 
Videocard: MSI 1060 mxm 6GB
Processor: i7 3920xm@4,2Ghz
Mainboard: m18x-r2
Memory: 8GB@2133cl11
Soundcard: Creative CT9570
PSU: std. 330w
Default 01-20-2017, 11:17 | posts: 18 | Location: Italy


Hello all!
This my old notebook but still fast enough for me and my purpose.

i7 3920xm@4200Mhz (4c/8t)link

ST 1820
MT 7586

later i'll edit and upload a comprensive screenshot
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#52)
user1
Master Guru
 
user1's Avatar
 
Videocard: hd 6870
Processor: intel xeon e5450 @3.6ghz
Mainboard: ip35-e
Memory: PC2-6400 DDR2 6GB
Soundcard:
PSU: 550w
Default 01-26-2017, 12:51 | posts: 404



chip could probably do 4.2~ghz if i had a better motherboard and better ram.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#53)
akbaar
Master Guru
 
Videocard: MSI GTX1080 Gaming X
Processor: Intel Core i7 6700k @4.6
Mainboard: ASUS MAXIMUS VIII IMPACT
Memory: 32gb G.SKILL 3200 CL14 1T
Soundcard: SupremeFX Impact III
PSU: Corsair AX760i
Default 01-26-2017, 13:13 | posts: 221 | Location: Middle East Region

   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#54)
siriq
Master Guru
 
siriq's Avatar
 
Videocard: Evga GTX 570 Classified
Processor: FX 8350@4.8&PII x6 1090T
Mainboard: GA 890FX-UD5
Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Soundcard: Asus Xonar D2X PCIE
PSU: Seasonic
Default 03-07-2017, 23:22 | posts: 750 | Location: Earth

Doing just fine with FX 8350@4882 MHz


I am very surprised with this score. Not so far behind i7 6700K OC score.

Last edited by siriq; 03-07-2017 at 23:27.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#55)
siriq
Master Guru
 
siriq's Avatar
 
Videocard: Evga GTX 570 Classified
Processor: FX 8350@4.8&PII x6 1090T
Mainboard: GA 890FX-UD5
Memory: 16GB DDR3 1600MHz
Soundcard: Asus Xonar D2X PCIE
PSU: Seasonic
Default 03-07-2017, 23:28 | posts: 750 | Location: Earth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Extraordinary View Post
You have kinda low score there, compare to mine.

Update your cpu-z!

Last edited by siriq; 03-07-2017 at 23:34.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#56)
squalles
Master Guru
 
Videocard: Galax GTX 1080 EXOC OC
Processor: i7 2700k @ 4.7ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67
Memory: 2x8gb Gskill ddr3 2133mhz
Soundcard: X-FI Titanium
PSU: XFX 850w ProSeries
Default 04-22-2017, 07:44 | posts: 550 | Location: Brazil

these benchmark values are completely different now in new version 1.79
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#57)
ultraex2003
Member Guru
 
ultraex2003's Avatar
 
Videocard: Amd 2x290 Cfx
Processor: i7 5820k @ 4.0
Mainboard: Gigabyte x99-sli
Memory: G-skill ripjaws v @ 3200
Soundcard: stock
PSU: Coolemaster v 1000
Default 04-22-2017, 08:49 | posts: 69 | Location: greece

very different measurement cpu-z 1.79 edition

i5 3570k @ 5.0+

   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#58)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz-1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX 16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Realtek onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 04-24-2017, 12:23 | posts: 9,667 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by squalles View Post
these benchmark values are completely different now in new version 1.79
Just noticed that.

2500k @ 4.7Ghz


Last edited by Undying; 04-24-2017 at 12:27.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#59)
-Tj-
Ancient Guru
 
-Tj-'s Avatar
 
Videocard: ZOTAC GTX980Ti Amp!Omega
Processor: Intel i7 4770K OC 4.7GHz
Mainboard: ASUS Z87 Deluxe 2103
Memory: Gskill TridX 16GB 2400MHz
Soundcard: X-Fi Titanium HD @Bose A5
PSU: Nitro88+ 650W 52A
Default 05-01-2017, 02:19 | posts: 13,785 | Location: Proxima \/82

Ok


https://valid.x86.fr/2lzkan
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#60)
wwenigma
Newbie
 
Videocard: AMD R9 270OC 2GB
Processor: FX-8320@4GHz
Mainboard: Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory: DDR3-1600 8GB
Soundcard: Creative Audigy 4 PRO
PSU: Chieftec 500W
Default 05-02-2017, 10:25 | posts: 4 | Location: Hungary

Made a quick comparison between new and old scores, they mentioned problems in CPUZ website and they says the Ryzen processors were affected. I have an older FX, but scores are changed... they "call" Intel before make new methods for testing?

kephost.com/images/2017/05/02/cpuz_intel_powered.png

If you see that PassMark comparison, the multithread performance is 124% vs 4GHz 8350 100%. cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2565&cmp[]=1780

Last edited by wwenigma; 05-02-2017 at 10:56.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#61)
Undying
Ancient Guru
 
Undying's Avatar
 
Videocard: R9 280X Vapor-X
Processor: Intel i5 @ 4.8Ghz-1.38v
Mainboard: Gigabyte Z68XP-UD3P
Memory: HyperX 16GB @ 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Realtek onboard
PSU: Tt ToughpowerXT 775W
Default 05-02-2017, 12:12 | posts: 9,667 | Location: Serbia, NS

Quote:
Originally Posted by wwenigma View Post
Made a quick comparison between new and old scores, they mentioned problems in CPUZ website and they says the Ryzen processors were affected. I have an older FX, but scores are changed... they "call" Intel before make new methods for testing?

kephost.com/images/2017/05/02/cpuz_intel_powered.png

If you see that PassMark comparison, the multithread performance is 124% vs 4GHz 8350 100%. cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2565&cmp[]=1780
Idk why the changed the method of testing but AMD scores are indeed disappointing. I'll show that picture you posted until you get 10 posts.

   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#62)
wwenigma
Newbie
 
Videocard: AMD R9 270OC 2GB
Processor: FX-8320@4GHz
Mainboard: Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory: DDR3-1600 8GB
Soundcard: Creative Audigy 4 PRO
PSU: Chieftec 500W
Default 05-02-2017, 12:30 | posts: 4 | Location: Hungary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Undying View Post
I'll show that picture you posted until you get 10 posts.
Thanks, i mostly only read that forum.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#63)
user1
Master Guru
 
user1's Avatar
 
Videocard: hd 6870
Processor: intel xeon e5450 @3.6ghz
Mainboard: ip35-e
Memory: PC2-6400 DDR2 6GB
Soundcard:
PSU: 550w
Default 05-03-2017, 00:06 | posts: 404


what ever it is that they did it definitely has an intel bias, those fx cpus have taken a much greater hit than they should have, have a hard time believing that a 6700k only has a 28% ipc advantage over a core 2 quad. seems that by "fixing" the benchmark for ryzen they broke it for comparing "realistic" performance on alot of other cpus.

Last edited by user1; 05-03-2017 at 00:29.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#64)
er557
Master Guru
 
Videocard: 2x 1080 sc acx 3.0 sli
Processor: xeon e5 2686 v3 max3.5ghz
Mainboard: msi x99s gaming 7
Memory: 44gb gskill 2133mhz
Soundcard: sb Z
PSU: zalman 1k gvm
Default 05-21-2017, 23:37 | posts: 323

The latest xeon hack in play(no overclocking)
e5 2686 v3 18c/36t 2.9ghz-->3.5ghz

http://i.imgur.com/eg5qtbB.jpg
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#65)
pokyeah88
Member Guru
 
Videocard: gtx 1060 6gb zotac mini
Processor: Ryzen 1600 3.8@1.35
Mainboard: biostar x370gt5
Memory: ddr4 16 2993 4/8/4
Soundcard: onboard
PSU: thermaltake toughpower
Default 07-20-2017, 19:13 | posts: 45 | Location: Malaysia



is this normal because my ram configuration is 4/8/4
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 2017, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.