1. iancook221188

    iancook221188 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    GTX 670 SLI / GTX 460 SLI
    well what do you think this means??

    [18:34:05] CoreStatus = C0000005 (-1073741819)
    [18:34:05] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0xc0000005

    normal means ram, funny how this happens when i sat down to play so music

    [18:14:57] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
    [18:14:57] + Number of Units Completed: 158

    [18:15:04] Trying to send all finished work units
    [18:15:04] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [18:15:04] - Preparing to get new work unit...
    [18:15:04] Cleaning up work directory
    [18:15:04] + Attempting to get work packet
    [18:15:04] Passkey found
    [18:15:04] - Will indicate memory of 6142 MB
    [18:15:04] - Connecting to assignment server
    [18:15:04] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
    [18:15:05] Posted data.
    [18:15:05] Initial: 43AB; - Successful: assigned to (171.67.108.22).
    [18:15:05] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
    [18:15:05] Loaded queue successfully.
    [18:15:05] Sent data
    [18:15:05] Connecting to http://171.67.108.22:8080/
    [18:15:14] Posted data.
    [18:15:14] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 24877575)
    [18:15:57] - Downloaded at ~564 kB/s
    [18:15:57] - Averaged speed for that direction ~530 kB/s
    [18:15:57] + Received work.
    [18:15:58] Trying to send all finished work units
    [18:15:58] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [18:15:58] + Closed connections
    [18:15:58]
    [18:15:58] + Processing work unit
    [18:15:58] Core required: FahCore_a5.exe
    [18:15:58] Core found.
    [18:15:58] Working on queue slot 06 [March 6 18:15:58 UTC]
    [18:15:58] + Working ...
    [18:15:58] - Calling '.\FahCore_a5.exe -dir work/ -nice 19 -suffix 06 -np 11 -checkpoint 3 -verbose -lifeline 6052 -version 634'

    [18:15:58]
    [18:15:58] *------------------------------*
    [18:15:58] Folding@Home Gromacs SMP Core
    [18:15:58] Version 2.27 (Mar 12, 2010)
    [18:15:58]
    [18:15:58] Preparing to commence simulation
    [18:15:58] - Looking at optimizations...
    [18:15:58] - Created dyn
    [18:15:58] - Files status OK
    [18:16:02] - Expanded 24877063 -> 30796325 (decompressed 123.7 percent)
    [18:16:02] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=24877063 data_size=30796325, decompressed_data_size=30796325 diff=0
    [18:16:02] - Digital signature verified
    [18:16:02]
    [18:16:02] Project: 2692 (Run 0, Clone 7, Gen 82)
    [18:16:02]
    [18:16:02] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [18:16:02] Entering M.D.
    [18:16:08] Mapping NT from 11 to 10
    [18:16:10] Completed 0 out of 250000 steps (0%)
    [18:40:08] Completed 2500 out of 250000 steps (1%)
    [19:04:32] Completed 5000 out of 250000 steps (2%)
    [19:28:48] Completed 7500 out of 250000 steps (3%)
    [19:53:06] Completed 10000 out of 250000 steps (4%)
    [20:16:15] Completed 12500 out of 250000 steps (5%)
    [20:39:34] Completed 15000 out of 250000 steps (6%)
    [20:40:43] - Autosending finished units... [March 6 20:40:43 UTC]
    [20:40:43] Trying to send all finished work units
    [20:40:43] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [20:40:43] - Autosend completed
    [21:02:51] Completed 17500 out of 250000 steps (7%)
    [21:26:14] Completed 20000 out of 250000 steps (8%)
    [21:49:39] Completed 22500 out of 250000 steps (9%)
    [22:13:22] Completed 25000 out of 250000 steps (10%)
    [22:37:31] Completed 27500 out of 250000 steps (11%)
    [23:01:28] Completed 30000 out of 250000 steps (12%)
    [23:25:13] Completed 32500 out of 250000 steps (13%)
    [23:48:17] Completed 35000 out of 250000 steps (14%)
    [00:11:40] Completed 37500 out of 250000 steps (15%)
    [00:36:07] Completed 40000 out of 250000 steps (16%)
    [01:00:29] Completed 42500 out of 250000 steps (17%)
    [01:23:42] Completed 45000 out of 250000 steps (18%)
    [01:46:53] Completed 47500 out of 250000 steps (19%)
    [02:10:07] Completed 50000 out of 250000 steps (20%)
    [02:33:18] Completed 52500 out of 250000 steps (21%)
    [02:40:43] - Autosending finished units... [March 7 02:40:43 UTC]
    [02:40:43] Trying to send all finished work units
    [02:40:43] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [02:40:43] - Autosend completed
    [02:56:37] Completed 55000 out of 250000 steps (22%)
    [03:19:43] Completed 57500 out of 250000 steps (23%)
    [03:42:57] Completed 60000 out of 250000 steps (24%)
    [04:06:00] Completed 62500 out of 250000 steps (25%)
    [04:29:11] Completed 65000 out of 250000 steps (26%)
    [04:52:21] Completed 67500 out of 250000 steps (27%)
    [05:15:31] Completed 70000 out of 250000 steps (28%)
    [05:38:37] Completed 72500 out of 250000 steps (29%)
    [06:01:44] Completed 75000 out of 250000 steps (30%)
    [06:24:52] Completed 77500 out of 250000 steps (31%)
    [06:48:07] Completed 80000 out of 250000 steps (32%)
    [07:11:21] Completed 82500 out of 250000 steps (33%)
    [07:34:33] Completed 85000 out of 250000 steps (34%)
    [07:57:41] Completed 87500 out of 250000 steps (35%)
    [08:20:58] Completed 90000 out of 250000 steps (36%)
    [08:40:43] - Autosending finished units... [March 7 08:40:43 UTC]
    [08:40:43] Trying to send all finished work units
    [08:40:43] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [08:40:43] - Autosend completed
    [08:44:01] Completed 92500 out of 250000 steps (37%)
    [09:07:13] Completed 95000 out of 250000 steps (38%)
    [09:30:17] Completed 97500 out of 250000 steps (39%)
    [09:53:28] Completed 100000 out of 250000 steps (40%)
    [10:16:33] Completed 102500 out of 250000 steps (41%)
    [10:39:34] Completed 105000 out of 250000 steps (42%)
    [11:02:46] Completed 107500 out of 250000 steps (43%)
    [11:26:06] Completed 110000 out of 250000 steps (44%)
    [11:49:10] Completed 112500 out of 250000 steps (45%)
    [12:12:17] Completed 115000 out of 250000 steps (46%)
    [12:35:23] Completed 117500 out of 250000 steps (47%)
    [12:58:38] Completed 120000 out of 250000 steps (48%)
    [13:21:42] Completed 122500 out of 250000 steps (49%)
    [13:44:53] Completed 125000 out of 250000 steps (50%)
    [14:08:01] Completed 127500 out of 250000 steps (51%)
    [14:31:05] Completed 130000 out of 250000 steps (52%)
    [14:40:43] - Autosending finished units... [March 7 14:40:43 UTC]
    [14:40:43] Trying to send all finished work units
    [14:40:43] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [14:40:43] - Autosend completed
    [14:54:19] Completed 132500 out of 250000 steps (53%)
    [15:17:34] Completed 135000 out of 250000 steps (54%)
    [15:40:52] Completed 137500 out of 250000 steps (55%)
    [16:04:10] Completed 140000 out of 250000 steps (56%)
    [16:27:29] Completed 142500 out of 250000 steps (57%)
    [16:50:39] Completed 145000 out of 250000 steps (58%)
    [17:13:49] Completed 147500 out of 250000 steps (59%)
    [17:36:55] Completed 150000 out of 250000 steps (60%)
    [18:00:05] Completed 152500 out of 250000 steps (61%)
    [18:23:16] Completed 155000 out of 250000 steps (62%)
    [18:32:26] mdrun returned 255
    [18:32:26] Going to send back what have done -- stepsTotalG=250000
    [18:32:26] Work fraction=0.6239 steps=250000.
    [18:34:02] logfile size=152145 infoLength=152145 edr=0 trr=25
    [18:34:02] logfile size: 152145 info=152145 bed=0 hdr=25
    [18:34:02] - Writing 152683 bytes of core data to disk...
    [18:34:05] CoreStatus = C0000005 (-1073741819)
    [18:34:05] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0xc0000005
    [18:34:05] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
    [18:34:21] Trying to send all finished work units
    [18:34:21] + No unsent completed units remaining.
    [18:34:21] - Preparing to get new work unit...
    [18:34:21] Cleaning up work directory
    [18:34:21] + Attempting to get work packet
    [18:34:21] Passkey found
    [18:34:21] - Will indicate memory of 6142 MB
    [18:34:21] - Connecting to assignment server
    [18:34:21] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
    [18:34:22] Posted data.
    [18:34:22] Initial: ED82; - Successful: assigned to (130.237.232.141).
    [18:34:22] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
    [18:34:22] Loaded queue successfully.
    [18:34:22] Sent data
    [18:34:22] Connecting to http://130.237.232.141:8080/
    [18:34:30] Posted data.
    [18:34:30] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 24874432)
     
  2. Mannerheim

    Mannerheim Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,915
    Likes Received:
    95
    GPU:
    MSI 6800XT
    Maybe ur CPU OC aint 100% stable?
     
  3. PlayN@Home

    PlayN@Home Active Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3 @ GTX 570 WC
    That's what happening to me. I tried pushing my clock speed up to yours, but couldn't keep it running stable. 4.1 is about the best I can can do with this new core A5. I've got one system that won't run the A5 with big WU at all. Runs A3 WU's all day long. Frustrating.:bang:
     
  4. iancook221188

    iancook221188 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    GTX 670 SLI / GTX 460 SLI
    yer mite be the ram OC i say that because ive had the Client-core communications error: ERROR 0xc0000005 problem be for just cant remember how i solve it

    must check the ram timing as this ram even tho a none good overclocker it normal speed is 1600mhz 6,8,6,20 i think im at 8,9,8,24
     

  5. PlayN@Home

    PlayN@Home Active Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3 @ GTX 570 WC
    My memory is close to yours. Mushkin Enhanced Ridgeback 6GB, running at 2016mhz, 8-10-8/24, 1.65v. I would think that yours should be able handle pressure at 1600mhz. Memtest has helped me when I've had memory problems. Hope you get it straightened out soon. Cryptic errors are the worst.
     
  6. PantherX

    PantherX Folding@Home Team Leader

    Messages:
    1,380
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
    Since the FahCore_a5 is a new one, it may contain some tweaks which might push the system slightly which is enough to make it unstable. What happens when you return the settings to stock? What happens if you lower the OC settings by a notch or two?
     
  7. PlayN@Home

    PlayN@Home Active Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3 @ GTX 570 WC
    On my i7-920, I can get the A3 core to run stable at 4.0 and that was running big WU's. But the A5 won't run stable even when I drop the CPU back to 3.3, big WU and regular. I'll never be able to complete a big WU if I run it any slower. I either get an error message like Ian's or I get a Windows FahCore_a5.exe application crash.

    On my 970, I've only got two complaints. It's dropping down to 10 cores instead of the 11 I've told it to use and it's reduced my three GTX 470's by about 1500 PPD, each.:(
     
  8. PantherX

    PantherX Folding@Home Team Leader

    Messages:
    1,380
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
    If the message appears will all stock settings, then it might be worth investigating. Your best bet is to make a thread at the official forums were someone can figureout the error.

    The reason that it remaps the 11 to 10 is because 11 is a "bad" number, i.e. it will be
    giving you errors on a siginificant amount of WUs. Other "bad" values are also black listed and this is done by the FahCore do you can't change it.

    BTW, if the SMP is using 10 instead of 11 CPUs, how is it reducing your PPD by the GPU3 Client?
     
  9. iancook221188

    iancook221188 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    GTX 670 SLI / GTX 460 SLI
    well im going 71kppd smp12, 61kppd smp11, 53ppd smp10

    on the 920 front does smp7 still work
     
  10. PlayN@Home

    PlayN@Home Active Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3 @ GTX 570 WC
    Panther: With the GPU clients all I know is that when the CPU process with an A3 WU each video card gets about 13000+PPD. When the A5 core runs they get about 11000PPD. I've seen it do this a few times where the video cards will be in the middle of processing project and the CPU will finish a A3 and start working on an A5 and the video cards PPD drop. I'll see what going all the way back to defaults do on the 920. I'm not giving up on getting the A5 core running on the 920 just yet, thanks.

    I'm guessing they rewrote the A5 core in a way that it can't handle division by 11? Makes you wander if all of the A3 projects that were processed with 11 cores are good. I wasn't getting any EOEs.

    Ian: on the 920 I've got it configured for 7 cores and it says that's it's mapping 7 to 7. I'm getting 49kPPD on the 970, p2684 get me about 30kPPD if I'm lucky.
     

  11. iancook221188

    iancook221188 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    GTX 670 SLI / GTX 460 SLI
    witch core/threads have you set to run the gpu i.e thread 8,10 witch ones are not folding and have you set up prolasso to let 2 gpu's on one core and 1 on the other i had to do lot of researched to see what cpu cycles the gpu where using even tho i had set the to thread 12 they still used thread 12 and 7 so when i set them to thread 7 they only used thread 7
     
  12. PlayN@Home

    PlayN@Home Active Member

    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    3 @ GTX 570 WC
    Each of the video cards wanted to use a different core, they just wouldn't agree, so I've got all of them on 10 using prolasso. I've got the CPU folding on all but 10. I've tried setting the CPU to use 10 cores, two video cards on one core, and the third card on the last core with prolasso. The video card PPD stayed the same and CPU PPD dropped a few thousand points. With the video cards on one core they are processing at 98%-99%, with an occasional dip to 95% and that core is running at about 60%.
     

Share This Page