Hi, guys and friends! --> All results running i5-2500K@4.5GHz 3DMark03 - "Pixel Shader 2.0" feature test: GTX 480-334.89WHQL (HQ), Win 7 x64 SP1 - 1496.8 fps GTX 580-340.52WHQL (HQ), same OS - 1582.1 fps GTX 670-347.09WHQL (HQ), Win 8.1 x64 - 1288.4 fps GTX 770 SC-347.09WHQL (HQ), same OS - 1305.9 fps GTX 780 Ti Classy-347.09WHQL (HQ), same OS - 3149.4 fps wowww!! Video Card Stability Test - v1.0.0.3 build 80416 benchmark --> DOWNLOAD <--: GTX 480-306.23WHQL (HQ), Win XP x86 XP3 - 1517 fps GTX 580-337.88WHQL (HQ), same OS - 1676 fps GTX 670-same driver, same OS - ~1350 fps GTX 770 SC-same driver, same OS - ~1600 fps GTX 780 Ti Classy-344.75WHQL (HQ), same OS - 3216 fps wowww!! Same videocard-347.71beta (HQ), Win 8.1 x64 - 2959 fps Lightsmark 2.0 (2008) - see my post GK110 gets impressive!!! -> Why's the dfference of performances between GK104 and GK110 huge? xD ATTENTION to factory OC: GTX 770 SC has 1085MHz core while GTX 780 Ti Classified 1020MHz.
and what's the point in these uber high fps, kinda pointless and doesn't say much.. Why dont you bench some real world stuff.. Idk like a game benchmark? LP2 or RE6 or FFXIV reborn or Heaven or Hitman Absolution or Sleeping Dogs or DMC4 or FC2 or Grid2/AutoSport or Dirt2/3,...
Sorry, I'll post tomorrow in few games. But can you not explain why? I have edited to add Lightmark 2008 in OP, sorry.
Sorry for later. Solution - see my OP: Because GK110 is 2x more nr of transistors than GK104. And transistors + GPU + VRAM. I think GTX 980@ref-stock gets 2200-2300 fps AVG in "Video Card Stability Test" - benchmark running Win 8.1 x64.
You are not worried but your CPU doesn't get any bottlenecked. Greater nr of transistors is very important for "Video Card Stability Test", "Pixel Shader 2.0" feature (3DM03)... Thank you, friend.
I have increased power limit from 100% to 106% (but do not do OC )... I can get bit better performance here Video Card Stability Test - v1.0.0.3 build 80416 benchmark: GTX 780 Ti Classy-344.75WHQL (HQ), Win XP x86 SP3 - 3246 fps wow!