Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Videocards > Benchmark Mayhem
Benchmark Mayhem This section is for you benchmark freaks. Wanna show off your 3D Mark scores with your brand new GTX 980 SLI or Radeon R9 290X Crossfire in that Intel Core i7 rig? Then this is your section!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Gaming benchmarks: Core i5 2500 vs Core i5 6500 vs Core i3 6320
Old
  (#1)
Artas1984
Member Guru
 
Videocard: Evga GeForce GTX1080 SC
Processor: Intel Core i7 5775C 4 GHz
Mainboard: GA-Z97X-Gaming 3
Memory: DDR3 1600 MHz CL8 16 GB
Soundcard: Logitech Z 5500
PSU: Corsair HX850
Arrow Gaming benchmarks: Core i5 2500 vs Core i5 6500 vs Core i3 6320 - 08-12-2017, 16:43 | posts: 77 | Location: Lithuania

Since this is a benchmark section, i will post some of CPU battle results, no mater if it is under video card category, since this seems to be the only subforum with "benchmarks" title on it.

I had the chance to test the Skylake Core i3 6320 and Core i5 6500 chips against the legendary Sandy Bridge Core i5 2500.

Open Core i5 2500 vs Core i5 6500 vs Core i3 6320 gaming benchmarks to see the results.

For those who have a Sandy Bridge chip like Core i5 2400/2500 with a basic motherboard, this is good news (i guess). If you have a Z motherboard with Core i5 2500K overclocked to 4.5 GHz, it will beat Core i5 6500 all over the place.

I found Core i3 6320 to be a great chip, it has got enough frequency to pull games up and can be faster than Core i5 6500 in 2 core threaded games. Core i5 i found a bit disappointing, the fact that it can loose to Core i5 2500 in more than a few games does not justify it as a gaming CPU.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#2)
RealNC
Maha Guru
 
RealNC's Avatar
 
Videocard: EVGA GTX 980 Ti FTW
Processor: Intel Core i5 2500K
Mainboard: MSI P67A-C43
Memory: DDR3 16GB
Soundcard: Asus Xonar D1, JBL Spot
PSU: Corsair HX650
Default 08-12-2017, 17:28 | posts: 1,160

Most of the results do seem to make sense, since these games aren't known to be memory-bandwidth bottlenecked. For example, if you bench Fallout 4 or Watch Dogs 2, you should see the 2500K falling behind.

But some of the results do not make sense. The Metro Last Light Redux and Rainbow Six Siege resuls look weird. Why would the 2500K be faster than the 6500 here?

Another thing: as we move towards 1440p as "the new 1080p", it might make more sense to bench that one. This is of special interest to Sandy Bridge users, since 1440p means a GPU bottleneck in most cases, leaving the CPU at lower loads (meaning less reason to upgrade from Sandy.) In other words, if you need to choose between a new platform or a new, large, shiny 1440p monitor, the monitor might make more sense (if you have the GPU for it, or plan to get one.)

Last edited by RealNC; 08-12-2017 at 17:34.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 2017, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.