NVIDIA is moving forward with a budged oriented GT 1030. The GPU that empowers it has now been spotted including a GPU die photo and AOTS results.... Nvidia GP108-300 GPU Spotted - GeForce GT 1030
Why the hell is nvidia started using "GTX" branding on low end cards? 1060 and above should be GTX, anything below is GT. What a foul way to trick the customers to think that card is faster than it actually is.
I think it is branded GT? I personally forgot the GT brand even existed lol. Didn't they use it to differentiate cards like the 8800GT from the Ultra and 9800GT? Those are the last GT cards I remember.
They still did for the most part with up till gtx 5XXX series. You had the GTS series and GTX series. But last of true GT cards was the 200 Series. GT 240 and under , GTS 250, GTX 260 up. There was 8600 gt, 8600 GTS, 8800 GTS 320,640,512, 8800 GTX, 8800 Ultra Geforce 9 Series had no ultra. But had a Gx2 card. At times, AMD and Nvidia can be a pain in the ass with gpu naming schemes.
Not counting OEM cards, there were GT cards up until the 700 series (GT 710, GT 720, GT 730 and GT 740).
Nv should make it a true single slot design and then we can talk. Should be ok as a physx, was looking at one gtx750 from gainward but it got sold out some time ago.. didint find anything in 940-950 flavour:nerd: edit: https://geizhals.eu/gainward-geforc....html?hloc=at&hloc=de&hloc=pl&hloc=uk&hloc=eu but that price lol
These cards are pointless imo because the performance is too similar to onboard intel HD graphics. If you want a super budget card for a bit of light gaming or video editing, go for a 1050 or 1050ti. If you want a card for gaming, get 1060 or above.
Intel's Iris and Iris pro are actually viable for gaming! (mobas, mmorpgs, all older stuff, etc). I think the purpose for the lowest end discrete gpus should be equally to add media abilities like x265 which is miiiles better than x264, along with very low power usage (compatible with everything) and gaming ability. A modern version of the 750ti would be nice though, that card was an ace price/perf/power usage for the time.
These cards can only be good for older machines for people who want a video output... maybe there motherboard video output has gone or they need something for 4k output for example... beyond that they are useless. Something this weak is most likely going to be too weak for physx (not that the most recent cards need help doing physx anyway)
the monicker doesn't matter a bit, people still buy a 940MX and ask why it cannot utilise shadowplay/share. AMD is the worst for rebadging products without incorporating any changes. Atleast the 480 to 580 change brought about a better designed die and more active shaders...... that said, the 680 > 770 rebadge was shady....
Wait what???? A refined process that on average only gave the end user about 75MHz more OC headroom and rebadging a top product to another top tier product and keeping the same price is okay. But rebadging a top tier product to Upper midrange, giving it an updated PCB, giving it a new vBIOS with new features and lowering the price more than $100 is shady? I bet you guys would say something negative about Nvidia if they cured cancer. BYW there are no more shaders on 580 than 480. It is an overclock of 75MHz.
Your information is wrong, the GTX 480 had a full sm disabled to improve yields, the GTX 480 released with 480 CUDA cores, the 580 with 512. most of those 'improvements' turned out to cause issues, boost 2.0 and its on/off stutter.....
