3DMark Time Spy released

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by TDurden, Jul 14, 2016.

  1. chirop

    chirop Member Guru

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI GeForce GTX 1080 X
  2. pegasus1

    pegasus1 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,218
    Likes Received:
    3,626
    GPU:
    TUF 4090
  3. Ti3Kob

    Ti3Kob Guest

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    980Ti @1505/7600
    I'm getting the same ~6400ish GPU score with my 980ti @1500/7600. You might want to try with lower VRAM clocks. At 8000 I'll score lower than 7600 on my card as it's unstable (yet not unstable enough to crash).

    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1476711
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2017
  4. pegasus1

    pegasus1 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,218
    Likes Received:
    3,626
    GPU:
    TUF 4090
    Ive noticed this with the core speed of my 1080T, until the voltage control is working in Afterburner il leave it at +100
     

  5. Ti3Kob

    Ti3Kob Guest

    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    980Ti @1505/7600
    @pegasus1
    I think it makes sense. I suppose the GPU sends corrupted data to VRAM that then tries to autocorrect as more CRC checks are failing. Performance can only suffer.
     
  6. milamber

    milamber Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,273
    Likes Received:
    56
    GPU:
    MSI 4080 Suprim X
    MSI 980 (OC Mode) vs MSI 1070 (Default Mode)

    [​IMG]
     
  7. pegasus1

    pegasus1 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,218
    Likes Received:
    3,626
    GPU:
    TUF 4090
    Thats the highest GFX score ive seen on a Ti.
     
  8. Odellot

    Odellot Guest

    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    81
    GPU:
    TUF RTX 4090 FO48U
    Just Upgraded...Here's my score:

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Dragondale13

    Dragondale13 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,527
    Likes Received:
    245
    GPU:
    GTX 1070 AMP! • H75
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2017
  10. Mars73

    Mars73 Member

    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    Gigabyte GTX1080Ti
    Just ran Time Spy on my new Gigabyte Aorus GTX1080Ti and got a graphics score of: 9763
    No overclocking, power limit or core voltage adjustments, only a custom fan on Auto.
     

  11. chispy

    chispy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,996
    Likes Received:
    2,722
    GPU:
    RTX 4090
    Testing old drivers versus new drivers , # 1 test with good old trusty 378.92 =
    GTX 1080Ti @ 2126/1539Mhz

    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2119126

    [​IMG]



    Will test latest drivers released today 384.94 tomorrow night to compare :)
     
  12. A M D BugBear

    A M D BugBear Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    644
    GPU:
    4 GTX 970/4-Way Sli
    LOL, I can run all other 3dmark stuff's, but I get error's upon loading up Timespy, which is why its not on my playlist yet.

    Sometimes it works, then sometimes it will quit very unexpectedly.

    Good program though.
     
  13. chispy

    chispy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,996
    Likes Received:
    2,722
    GPU:
    RTX 4090
    Might be related to your dual cpu set up , send Futuremark a bug report to see if they fix it :) , i would love to see your score on that beastly machine of yours
     
  14. A M D BugBear

    A M D BugBear Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    644
    GPU:
    4 GTX 970/4-Way Sli
    Actually I got it finally to work this time.

    Pinpointed the main problem or problems.

    Apparently whats causing this issue is the fps meter programs such as fraps,Action Recorder, bandicam,etc.

    They all doing the same thing, it does NOT work with these programs, moreover, With precision XOC, it does NOT work with it, even if I put the memory and gpu speed at +0, All dont work but one program did:

    The one and only Msi Afterburner.

    Works perfectly with this program but can't get the pwr fan(fan on card itself) to work, need xoc for that but doesn't matter, got the bench finally to work and that's all that matters in the end.

    My score at default settings, using one card only, over 9k, but thats with using the shadowplay recorder at MAX settings, so score will be higher without it, haven't tried without it, will soon, Will give update later.

    I did sli mode and as expected, the sli usage aint 80/90+% on both gpu's, more like upper 70's, the settings and res are just to low for it, so I only did one gpu, plus there isn't many bits selection to use within nvidia inspector due to the nature of this program being DX12.

    I did do a custom run/video record(2 1080ti) @ 4k(2160p) MAX for kicks, will be posting that on my playlist in comparision with my old 2 980ti hybrids.

    Sadly, in order to view the final net score is only through default bench run from what I understand, not custom runs.

    UPDATE:

    Single 1080ti without video recorder turned on, final score:

    Over 9.7k @ 2038/12.5k

    Good cpu utilization but used no where near 100%, not even close but decent amount, about half usage per core, ab only shows up to 32 though, so I don't know if this program can use more then 32 cores/threads,etc.

    Since 32 cores and under is what locked for 32bit applications, since this being 64bit, it could have used more, hard to say, graph showed up to 32, even if it did used more, more then likely only used less then half cpu usage per thread/core during cpu bench, absolutely used no where of its potential of these cpu's, but decent amount per core.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2017
  15. A M D BugBear

    A M D BugBear Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    644
    GPU:
    4 GTX 970/4-Way Sli

Share This Page