Log in or Sign up

Metal Gear Solid V Performance Thread

Discussion in 'Games, Gaming & Game-demos' started by (.)(.), Aug 28, 2015.

Page 1 of 6

(.)(.) Banned

Messages:

9,089

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GTX 970
Metal Gear Solid V Performance and Mods Thread

20 video cards in the benchmark with Phantom Pain (includes CPU info at the bottom of page)
1080, 1440, 2160p

Google Translate
Original - incase you have issues with the resolution selector in the link above.

_________//MODS//_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Disable in-game AA (fxaa):
NeoGaf member ‘Alo81’

Unlock Framerate: "..according to early reports, this won’t break the game’s physics." - DSO
NeoGaf member ‘Alo81’

FOV Fix
by Altimor
Download - FOV Fix
Instructions: Place inside main folder where .exe is located. Edit fov.txt as required.

Modded Extra High - File: Download LUA
NeoGaf - Comparison Gif in link
Instructions - JonasBeckman

JonasBeckman said: ↑

Download the latest version of the QAR tool from:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0rtpumx2mxsjaby/MGSV_QAR_Tool.rar?dl=0

Extra them somewhere and then copy the file "data1.dat" in the MGSV_TPP/Master folder in the same folder and drag&drop it over MGSV_QAR_Tool.exe to extract it.

In the extracted data1 folder go to "\Fox\Scripts\Gr" and replace gr_init_dx11.lua with the modded version and then back out of the data1 folder and drag&drop data1.ini over MGSV_QAR_Tool.exe to repack the new archive.
(I recommend keeping the original file as a back-up, I'm using data1.dat_ for example.)

(I would also recommend you compare the new .lua with the original so you know exactly what was changed but you don't really need to, I just prefer to be thorough and knowing what is being modified and how, in this case I don't really understand the strange values for shadow resolution and some of the view distance tweaks are pretty extreme but if the performance hit isn't too severe then that shouldn't be a problem unless the game becomes unstable.)
Click to expand...

Play as Quiet: NeoGAF - ‘rhayader’
Download this -.7z
Note: Uses Snakes animations and voice.
Instructions:

Navigate to your “Steam\steamapps\common\MGS_TPP\master\” folder

Extract this archive in there, so you should see two new subfolders: “Assets” and “QAR Tool”

Backup the file named chunk0.dat as it will be overridden

Open the “QAR Tool” folder in a new window (by the way, QAR Tool is from http://forum.xentax.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=12407&start=285)

Drag and Drop “chunk0.dat” over “MGSV_QAR_Tool.exe” to extract the contents from chunk0.dat.

Now you should have a new subfolder named “chunk0” as well as a new file “chunk0.inf”

Drag and drop the “Assets” folder from step 2 inside the new “chunk0” folder. It should ask you to merge folders and override one file, namely “plparts_mgs1.fpk”. Hit “yes” to everything

Last step: Drag and drop “chunk0.inf” (INF, not .dat) over “MGSV_QAR_Tool.exe” to repack the contents. This will recreate a new chunk0.dat and should take around 1 minute

Click to expand...

Drogean's TPP PC Mods
Faster Base building and Materials Processing and more Units
Reddit

More info can be found here: PCGamingWiki

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Widescreen 21:9 Fix - Thanks Signex & lmimmfn.
Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain- 21:9 support broken FI and Latest Updates

ReShade for MGSV:TPP - Thanks, signex.

signex said: ↑

Btw if you guys want ReShade to work use this one it works:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jzn2jsb0... Public Beta plus SweetFX 2.0 Preview.7z?dl=0
Click to expand...

SweetFX 1.5.1 is compatible with MGS5V:TPP
Gaf - Screenshots with SMAA and FXAA via Sweetfx vs in-game FXAA disabled.
Last edited: Sep 20, 2015

(.)(.), Aug 28, 2015

#1
PieEyedPiper Master Guru

Messages:

630

Likes Received:

11

GPU:

RX 580

VS:

Almost every cut-scene in The Phantom Pain holds a solid 60fps, but on the rare occasion that they do drop, it's a hard downward lurch. In these cases, a double-buffered v-sync locks PS4 to the 30fps line, and Xbox One tends to better maintain its composure at around 50fps. It's worth pointing out that actual drops like this are exceptional but as a stress-test, it does show how PS4 and Xbox One cope when faced with extreme engine load. It also makes it apparent that Xbox One's memory bandwidth is not, as might have been the case, being bottlenecked by the push to 1600x900 - a resource also tapped into by the alpha effects shown here. Surprisingly, Xbox One is capable of riding out these stress-points at a higher performance level than PS4.
Click to expand...

VS:

This performance divide is consistent with later stress-points too - as seen above, though once again, we should stress that these moments are fleeting and very rare indeed. Character close-ups like this show PS4 simply locking to 30fps, while Xbox One once again rides the scene out at 48fps. The jury's out on why this is precisely the case; this area runs at a perfect 60fps until the camera hones in on his glasses' reflections. Bizarrely, texture mapping (note across his forehead) also struggles to stream in on PS4 at this point - though other scenes show no problem.
Click to expand...

I found these bits most interesting.

PieEyedPiper, Aug 28, 2015

#2
(.)(.) Banned

Messages:

9,089

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GTX 970

Just a reminder this thread is here for those who wish to discuss performance issues and/or tweaks while avoiding spoilers in the main thread.

Ill update op with digital foundry pc version when it hits.

And any performance problems/tweaks etc i see in the main thread, ill post here if not already posted so others can check without concern for seeing spoilers.

(.)(.), Sep 1, 2015

#3
DocStrangelove Guest

Messages:

1,923

Likes Received:

461

GPU:

MSI RTX2080 Super

What do they mean - a 'push' to 1600x900 ?? made me laugh

IMO they shouldnt compare the XBO to the 360, they should compare it to modern PCs. FullHD is standard for years now.

DocStrangelove, Sep 1, 2015

#4
SweetTeeth Guest

Messages:

9

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Radeon R9 295X2 Crossfire

Nothing about performance here yet?!?! No complaints? Observations? Benchmarks? Am I to assume that it is the greatest and most perfect PC gaming implementation ever? lol JK

SweetTeeth, Sep 1, 2015

#5
isidore Guest

Messages:

6,276

Likes Received:

58

GPU:

RTX 2080TI GamingOC

Runs flawless for me, 3100x1800 all settings maxed out, constant 55-60fps with vsync on. Nothing to complain.

isidore, Sep 1, 2015

#6
SweetTeeth Guest

Messages:

9

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Radeon R9 295X2 Crossfire

Geryboy - good to hear! I wasn't sure how it was going to play out with GZ being so much smaller real estate wise.

Any body have anything to report about SLI/Crossfire performance at 4K?

SweetTeeth, Sep 1, 2015

#7
SweetTeeth Guest

Messages:

9

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Radeon R9 295X2 Crossfire

@isidore

On the 15.8 beta driver?

SweetTeeth, Sep 1, 2015

#8
Lurk Master Guru

Messages:

270

Likes Received:

65

GPU:

PNY RTX4080 VertoOC

anyone among us humans in the 7950 crossfire range and with a scruffy FX-8350?

Lurk, Sep 1, 2015

#9
DocStrangelove Guest

Messages:

1,923

Likes Received:

461

GPU:

MSI RTX2080 Super

I can play it in 4K but switched off some details and effects. Love it!

DocStrangelove, Sep 1, 2015

#10
(.)(.) Banned

Messages:

9,089

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GTX 970

SweetTeeth said: ↑

Nothing about performance here yet?!?! No complaints? Observations? Benchmarks? Am I to assume that it is the greatest and most perfect PC gaming implementation ever? lol JK
Click to expand...

Pretty much, yeah haha.

In hindsight, I don't know what I was thinking. I knew all to well that GZ was a fantastic port.

Last edited: Sep 2, 2015

(.)(.), Sep 2, 2015

#11
isidore Guest

Messages:

6,276

Likes Received:

58

GPU:

RTX 2080TI GamingOC

SweetTeeth said: ↑

@isidore

On the 15.8 beta driver?
Click to expand...

Yes.

isidore, Sep 2, 2015

#12
(.)(.) Banned

Messages:

9,089

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GTX 970

20 video cards in the benchmark with Phantom Pain
1080, 1440, 2160p
Google Translate
Original - incase you have issues with the resolution selector in the link above.

Added to op.

Last edited: Sep 2, 2015

(.)(.), Sep 2, 2015

#13
SweetTeeth Guest

Messages:

9

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Radeon R9 295X2 Crossfire

(.)(.) said: ↑

Pretty much, yeah haha.

In hindsight, I don't know what I was thinking. I knew all to well that GZ was a fantastic port.
Click to expand...

That's a good thing though, right? :infinity:

SweetTeeth, Sep 2, 2015

#14
isidore Guest

Messages:

6,276

Likes Received:

58

GPU:

RTX 2080TI GamingOC

The other two slides:

isidore, Sep 2, 2015

#15
archie123 Guest

Messages:

2,475

Likes Received:

17

GPU:

Aorus 1080ti Extreme

I'm getting a solid 60 at 1440

Last edited: Sep 2, 2015

archie123, Sep 2, 2015

#16
(.)(.) Banned

Messages:

9,089

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GTX 970

Thanks, isidore.

Added to OP

(.)(.), Sep 3, 2015

#17
Truder Ancient Guru

Messages:

2,400

Likes Received:

1,430

GPU:

RX 6700XT Nitro+

1920x1200 at max details, getting butter smooth 60fps! Pretty chuffed with that Mind you I do have my gpu oc'd 1150MHz core and 1500MHz memory (defaults on my card, 965MHz core 1400MHz mem). Cpu running at 4.2GHz driver version is just the WU driver which I believe is the hotfixed version of 15.7.1

Last edited: Sep 3, 2015

Truder, Sep 3, 2015

#18
eclap Banned

Messages:

31,468

Likes Received:

4

GPU:

Palit GR 1080 2000/11000

been away for a while, is there any way to change fov in MGSV? it's too narrow out the box.

eclap, Sep 4, 2015

#19
signex Ancient Guru

Messages:

9,072

Likes Received:

313

GPU:

RTX 4070 Super

Weird, i don't get 55fps avg with everything max.

They have to bench the second zone, it's far more performance heavy.

I saw a GPU usage of 50-60% in Afghanistan zone, 60fps the whole time while i get fps drops to 50s in Africa zone.

I have everything max except postprocessing and volumetric clouds off.

EDIT: I just noticed, hows the 960 ahead of the 770? and 760 almost the same performance?!
That doesn't make any sense, i'm sure the 770 is faster then 960 and way faster then 760?

signex, Sep 4, 2015

#20

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 1 of 6

Share This Page