New TitanX(Pascal) Benchmarks

Name is so confusing...wtf Nvidia
instead branding it as a ‘prosumer’ card, synthetic benches that focus on CuDNN are pretty relevant for this product. The new TITAN X offers a speedup of up to 2x in some cases.









GeForce GTX 1080, GTX 1070 and GTX 1060 scores are from my existing and upcoming reviews. Of course all values are showing graphics scores. It’s also worth noting that core clock of TITAN X boosts up to 1.8 GHz in 3DMark.

So what can we see on this chart? Well, it may now explain why GTX 1060 is lacking SLI finger. Two overclocked GTX 1060 cards would probably be faster than TITAN X in synthetics, while being 2.4 times cheaper.

NVIDIA TITAN X has ~1.3x performance of stock GTX 1080 and 1.13x of overclocked GTX 1080. It’s almost 1.5 times faster than GTX 1070 and 1.87x faster than overclocked GTX 1060.

TITAN X goes on sale tomorrow, but no one really knows how fast is it. Does NVIDIA really expect people to pay 1200 USD without knowing what they are paying for?

 

How is it confusing exactly?

 

with same name titanX..what if order old titan by mistake or you order correct but they sent you old TitanX..
New card name should be Titan X2

 

If the benches are true, there'd be a viable performance upgrade for me... and getting rid of SLI too.

 

Which isn't so much faster than working SLI 980s, and they work in practically every game I run tbh. Also, I'm just guessing at 1080TIs perfromance level, not buying a Titan... but then I hear myself saying 'wait till Volta'... dammit :bang:

 

Not saying now, but there will be one eventually, sometime early next year I guess, or they'll paperlaunch it for the holidays since they're using GDDR5X. Sometime Vega 10 will be around or so.

 

In 90% of the world GtX 1080 selling at 900$.

 

Yesterday i was checking GTX 1080 SLI benchmark.While it runs mind blowing on Dx 11 but on dx 12 games it fail big time.GPU manfecture blaming on Microsoft for this.Same with 980 sli you see that performance on directx 11 games but in directx 12 it flops too.

I think directx 12 is a problem rather than a solution.Before directx 12 release people were saying it will give 10%-15% increase in frames per second compare to directx 11 but in real it perform less in frames per second compare to directx 11 in every game.Hardware so expansive due to no competition still 3000$ pc cant give you 60 fps at 4k in all games.And VR for pc selling at 1300$.In other hand New PS4 will sell in 500$ with VR and they also say it give 60 fps at 4k.But think for a second even it wont give 60 FPS but 40FPS still its pretty awesome for 500$ price.

Only positive think i found in PC over past months is "Vulkan".what a incredible increase in performance.But i know future of Vulkan is not bright due to dictator Microsoft.

 

I'm not even running win10 yet, I couldn't care less about dx12 performance now. Might change in the future though, hence the idea to avoid SLI with my next purchase. Only question is, can I hold out to Volta's '1180Ti' for instance? Doubt it...

 

I'm betting you'll buy the 1080Ti which may launch in the beginning of 2017

 

So what time is the NDA up? It's Aug 2nd

 

I'm really tempted, yes... give myself a birthday present if it's out early
Could even improve some things about my loop when I'm at it already :banana:

We'll see. Not jumping on the Titan though, was just interested in it's performance, and if watercooling does indeed give you some advantage to things.

 

DX12 " SLI" is better than DX11 but leaves it up to the developer to implement.
Timespy has something like 97% scaling for me, Vulkan has no support at all.

It's looking slightly rosier for multi GPU now, but I still wouldn't buy 2x1080 over a Titan X unless you have lots of old games you have yet to play.
Half the DX12 games don't support it and all the Vulkan games have no support.

PS4 VR is 1080p, not 4k and even then it's not every game that has VR support, as 30fps would be vomit inducing in VR.

Looking forward to the reviews for this, would never buy but will be good to see what sort of numbers it can push out, especially at 4k.

 

In firestrike ultra benchmark stock titan XP score is 2x faster compared to OC'ed 1060 (6532 points vs 3260 points), impressive. Now I would like to see some titanXP OC results

 

980ti came 2-3 months after Titan X (Maxwell). I dont see why would anyone buy this when they gonna do that again with 1080ti.

 

Don't be surprised if there is no 1080ti .

 

I'm glad I bought 2 x strix 1080's. I do recognise the problems of running a multi-gpu system, however the new Titan X will likely cost roughly $2000-$2250 in Australia. I think I paid around $1250 each for 2 1080's. Then there is the issue of supply. I was lucky when I ordered my 1080's, they were available in store for pick-up in less than 10 days.

Will be keeping my current system for a very long time, suits my needs. 4K ultra @60fps. Pretty descent upgrade from 7970 xfire I think. (for gaming purposes anyway).

 

Are there going to be "proper reviews"? - I know its a silly question to ask but, considering its a "nvidia only store launch" you never know.

If those scores are correct, its not that impressive?

Sad face

 

The Firestrike score indicates a CPU bottleneck is present on the 1080 score. Hilbert's 1080 graphics score is 300 points higher.

Looking at the Ultra scores this card is 30% faster than the 1080.

I think 2 1070's is the way to go. If devs start properly utilizing multiple GPU in DX12.

 

Its not really that confusing the Maxwell Titan X is called the Geforce GTX Titan X while the Pascal Titan X is called the Nvidia Titan X. Not bad results if true. Makes me wonder if the Big daddy Pascal will OC better than the current pascal cards.