980 Ti Owners Thread

here 310-350 for a 980ti, but i was asking:


WHY i can t find a GTX TITANX at a decent price?

they costs exactly the same than 2 months ago:


here a USED titanx costs double than a NEW gtx 980ti
why?

 

Not at all, it beats the 1070.

 

Titans always keep their premium pricing. Even the original Kepler Titan is still expensive. Nvidia are selling them for one reason and you probably already know why...

 

I just saw review of MSI GTX 1070 SLI, My Zotac 980 Ti SLI beat'em up brutally. GTX 1070 even in SLI far behind 980 Ti SLI setup. I should rather wait for GTX 1080 Ti

 

100% true, but you re talking about new cards. i m asking about used cards pricing.


why titanx cost USED double than a gtx 980ti ?


all titanx owners are keeping their cards or selling em at double than the price of a 980ti.

how can they ask for so much money? i find used gtx 980ti for 310euro, but nobody is selling a titanx for less than 650euro


:infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity:
:infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity:
:infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity::infinity:

 

I'm thinking because they know people want them for sli

 

I think the ASIC value is utter horsecrap. My 59 ASIC MSI GTX 970 100ME used to overclock like motherfather.

For Pascal, the ASIC value cannot yet be determined.

 

thats why i bought another Ti instead of the 1080 , hopefully we will see a 1080ti within a year

 

I realized lately that my overclock weren't that stable actually, thanks to 3dmark new feature, and Star Citizen.

So instead of starting from my 1525Mhz overclock and trying to stabilize it, i started lower to get it fully stable.

I started at 1509Mhz which was stable with my previous ROM. Now... getting 1514Mhz fully stable was another story...

This is what it took me... :

 

Don't get fooled by XenthorX people.

Those writing over there are XenthorX's secret formula to cure World Hunger and Free Renewable Energy For All aka, W.H.C and FR.E.F.A!


On a serious note, A+ for effort. :thumbup:

 

hahahaha :nerd: Thanks!

It's actually ROM power tab tuning and feedback all the way.
Using Firestrike Combined test - how relevant is power distribution of the rom in the 80-90% Power Target range?
And Graphic test 1 - relevance of power on 90-95% power target
And Star Citizen, which is nuts and go anywhere from 50% power target to 100% with erratic power usage.


Sweet 980-Ti isn't afraid of youngling Pascal little brother.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8951084

 

^
This is at 1514 mhz and ram 2000mhz?


Guess Im not missing much then, 0.5 - 0.8FPS difference by gpu benchmarks


vs mine at 1480mhz, ram 1940mhz
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/8951084/fs/8632856

 

You must mean 4000Mhz Ram? I'm at 3937Mhz on Ram on the video card actually (and you've to multiply by 2: 7874Mhz).
And this run was at 1518Mhz on the 980-Ti and 4.7Ghz on the 5820K.
My GDDR4 ram is at 2400Mhz and Ring is 3.3Ghz.

It's quite a troll, the 4.7Ghz oc isn't stable at all. Back to 4.6 now ...

 

This one is at 4590Mhz on CPU 1518Mhz core gpu:
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8957122

I'm just pushing it really. The difference between 1480 and 1520 is minimal.

 

the basic ram speed thing that gpu-z reads.. I noticed later that 3dmark reads the same and it was at 1968mhz

Btw I manually forced lower boost and higher base when I modded mine.
I used base 1278mhz and boost 1418mhz, so extra OC on that made that base 1318MHz vs yours 1269mhz, but imo that shouldn't matter, maybe its that zotac power chip on the back that make stabler power delivery or you're running vram too high.. It can also cause negative fps, Asiju saw it on his evga too.

 

Ok, so i've worked my way slightly up a bit. Using calculator made it so much easy now.

With shadowplay disabled i'm stable to play with 1516Mhz core. And while recording i'm stable at 1514Mhz Core.

With 1516Mhz and my everyday CPU-oc at 4.6Ghz (previous post was trolly at 4.7Ghz):

Firestrike normal: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9019179


Firestrike extreme: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9020261

 

I stopped caring about my 980ti for a while.
I thought I'd read more about overclocking this thing and came across a thread where the guy states his Zotac AMP! Extreme boosts clocks higher than what Zotac advertises!

So.... I boot up MSI Afterburner and run a graphics intensive game. It turns out the card is actually boosting to 1.430Ghz core but memory was still advertised.
I was forcing +75 on the core and +190 on memory so it turns out the card was running at 1.505Ghz and memory at 7.6Ghz all this time
No wonder I getting crashes going any higher :banana:

 

Yea most cards boost higher than stated, it's a part of GPU Boost feature.

For example my cards "official" boost clock is 1190, in reality it boosts to 1350 @ stock.
I too wondered why I can't overclock any higher at first before realising the true boost clock...

 

c1:Your a savage dude lol Hopefully I can get a decent OC from my 1070 Gaming X that's coming soon.

 

I left mine at stock boost now, not worth the extra 5fps i'm getting of 1450mhz.

My vram clocks very poorly, anything over 100mhz and it starts to artifact in some games.

I'm not too disappointed, it still is fast enough as it is and OC'ing won't benefit for me anyway.