Oh man, there is no stopping this hype train is it? Somebody posted a screenshot of Ashes of the Singularity showing a CPU benchmark run with you guessed it right, an AMD Ryzen entry. You’ll notice that the run was done at 4K with a GeForce Titan X (Pascal). The processor is denoted as AMD Ryzen: ZD3601BAM88F4_40/36_Y http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/am...es-of-the-singularity-benchmark-database.html
Great for a laugh, but will wait for official reviews (and guru3D own review). I do want AMD to launch something great, I'd be all over that 8c/8t to replace my old i5-2500k.
"I just mimicked the settings and popped in a Titan X myself on a Core i7 6950X test rig here in the lab. My main VGA test rig is configured with all CPU cores (8) at 4.3 GHz" So you disabled 2 cores of the Core i7 6950X?
Sorry, a typo that already was fixed already in the news post. The VGA test setup runs a Core i7 5960X (Haswell-E) @ 4.3 GHz on all eight cores.
Correct, we also don't know if it actually was in there or if this was a photoshopped screenshot that got posted. The last bit seems a little unlikely though. I did check the AOTS database on that username, the results are no longer there.
as far as these results go i will ignore em completely, ryzen review will be here most likely at the end of this month and then HH will show us exactly what ryzen can do !
Should not the benchmark show the mode it was run in? Otherwise what good are the results. Thought the whole purpose was to run the tests in the same manor so the results can be compared and not just an unrelated set of numbers. That to me makes the benchmark only useful for personal purposes.
I noticed that when looking at the screenshot initially as well. It should say 3840x2160. However when I ran my test run at Ultra HD, the result set displayed 0 x 0 as well. Making that leaked screenshot a little more plausible.
Hilbert, leaked Rysen result must be in gpu mode (not cpu mode) as cpu mode only gives cpu framerate, not gpu at all.
I don't mind the hype...AMD deserves its build PR build up, imo. We shall see if the products that actually ship have been overstated or understated by the hype. I hope it's the latter... The most overstated example of hype that was completely undeserved that I've ever seen was nVidia's nv30... If you remember that--the web-site "countdown"--all of the phony benchmarks posted for weeks and months ahead of launch--and the final drab result that wound up being cancelled by nVidia six months after it shipped, you know what I mean. nv30 AKA "The leaf blower"...
Those are not the droids you are looking for. Move on. AMD_FanBoy running a Titan XP for an AotS benchmark... of course that looks strange.
some Russian? site did a comparison but its not really comparable, they found a bunch of V2 tests and with half-terrain on , not off like by AMD leak.. https://www.overclockers.ua/news/hardware/2017-02-03/119681/ I had some old tests too and got 99fps there by overall (v2 - AoS Escalation). 6700K @ 4.2Ghz? apparently got 107fps, 6950x@3Ghz? 78fps
Cheers Tj. Those Ryzen results look...weak? Infact, if I'm reading these results right, then, Ryzen is REALLY weak? That can't be right man, I don't think this is legit.
Yeah its weird, shame they didn't use cpu focused benchmark,. I got ~ 42fps there @ 1080p, crazy present dx12. And it used all 8 threads to the max 92-98%, at times all 99-100% and @ 70C, lol like cinebench15 :nerd:
One thing i have noticed is the majority of the benchmarks have half resolution terrain On, while this test has that disabled, i bet running the terrain at 4k is a killer rather than the default 2k.
