Review: Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark performance

Thanks for another game benchmark, HH. Next stop Dishonored 2

Overall decent performance from both sides. I wonder how MW remaster compare to this IW.

 

Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.

Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!

 

What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?

 

the gimping is so real

 

What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?

 

That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!

But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol

 

Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.

 

I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.

 

they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card

 

Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).

After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.

 

Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.

They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.

 

Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.

But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.

 

Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today

 

Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!

HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s

 

read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti

 

I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress.

 

So BF1 looks way better with far larger maps, higher player count, better assets, and yet uses less VRAM and manages to run better on the same equipment.
Bravo, Activision.