MAD, you must be locking your multiplier at 44. It's fine to overclock that way, but take a look at my results with ultimately the same overclock but using turbo to achieve greater single core performance, around 12%. 1 Core = 47 2 Core = 46 3 Core = 45 4 Core = 44
Yep. Most 2700ks do better because they are binned and/or intel has perfected manufacturing them. i think my old 2600k needed 1.47 volts for 5ghz
:biggun: 10457 points. But it still doesn't wanna run on my other (office) machine based on Sandy Bridge 2400 and 2x2GB 1600MHz RAM...:bang:
As I already said, it's nifty little thing.. its not 3DM11(just ref.) but I like it. Advertise it, SmileMan. Adverise away like crazy.. Let the world know..
10709 Multi: 5824 Single: 4885 i7 2600K@4.5ghz 10968 Multi: 5968 Single: 5000 i7 2600K@4.6ghz @SLI....I beat your score....
4150 MHz Launch Date: Q3'08 Recommended: $72.00 http://ark.intel.com/products/37212/Intel-Pentium-Processor-E5200-2M-Cache-2_50-GHz-800-MHz-FSB I don't like heavily threaded games anyway
Hehe, tick in google "black hole benchmark" and you'll find hundreds of threads about the bench! Btw, I got some sponsors
UPDATE Tried to remove all fuuu cheaters, but Idk if they're all gone... Some people tested it with all progs on, so their are too low scores for speeds too. Since AMD is really in disadvantage, I'll release 4.2 soon with auto clockspeed detector + maybe website + better scaling multi and single + 4 threaded test especially for gamers under us. Thanks for testing all! You helped me getting some idea about this. Now I can improve the bench