Guru3D.com Forums

Go Back   Guru3D.com Forums > Videocards > Videocards vs General Purpose - NVIDIA Ageia PhysX, GPGPU etc.
Videocards vs General Purpose - NVIDIA Ageia PhysX, GPGPU etc. In this section you can discuss general purpose application that run over your GPU, like transcoding, Physics simulation etc.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(PhysX Test) GTX 680 vs GTX 580 vs GTX 480 in FluidMark
Old
  (#1)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default (PhysX Test) GTX 680 vs GTX 580 vs GTX 480 in FluidMark - 05-02-2012, 14:55 | posts: 2,084

Found this article through Physxinfo
http://www.geeks3d.com/20120502/phys...-in-fluidmark/

680 vs 580 vs 480 in fluidmark:
120000 SPH particles, 19201080 fullscreen
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#2)
Xtreme1979
Maha Guru
 
Xtreme1979's Avatar
 
Videocard: EVGA GTX 680 2GB O/C
Processor: 2600K 4.4-4.7gHZ 1.30v
Mainboard: MSI P67A-C43 B3
Memory: DDR3 Ripjaws Z 2133 4x4gb
Soundcard: X-Fi/Klipsch ProMedia 2.1
PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold
Default 05-02-2012, 16:57 | posts: 1,256 | Location: Bay City, MI

So a nice PhysX boost with the 680. Good find!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default 05-02-2012, 17:46 | posts: 2,084

Considering it's double the performance, I'd like to see some proper CUDA based benchmarks between the 680 and 580. Don't think the OpenCL benchmarks show what the 680 can really do.
Although GK110 will probably be a much less crippled version for GeForce Kepler.

Last edited by Spets; 05-02-2012 at 17:49.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 05-02-2012, 23:00 | posts: 18,782 | Location: New Jersey, USA

the only thing I see wrong is the 480 is at stock, the 580 has a 25 mhz oc and the 680 is at 1097mhz where stock is 1006. all at stock or all similarily oc would be better
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#5)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default 05-03-2012, 01:05 | posts: 2,084

The 680's clock could have been from boost in the benchmark.
Would be interesting to see how they rank clock for clock, although with the 680's score I'd still imagine it would be ahead.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 05-03-2012, 02:24 | posts: 18,782 | Location: New Jersey, USA

gt 520 as gpu 2 with the 680 as gpu 1?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default 05-03-2012, 04:49 | posts: 2,084

Quote:
Originally Posted by ---TK--- View Post
gt 520 as gpu 2 with the 680 as gpu 1?
What?
I'm having one of those days
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
---TK---
Ancient Guru
 
---TK---'s Avatar
 
Videocard: 780Ti SC SLI/Qnix 2710
Processor: 2600k 4.6Ghz
Mainboard: Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Memory: RipJaws X 2x8GB 2133Mhz
Soundcard: Phoebus + DT880 Pro 250
PSU: Corsair AX 1200
Default 05-03-2012, 18:15 | posts: 18,782 | Location: New Jersey, USA

Just read the link you provided. You will see.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default 05-03-2012, 18:28 | posts: 2,084

Ah, now I get it, shouldn't add to the score since multithread is off.
Wonder why he left it in the testbed though.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Valken
Master Guru
 
Videocard: HIS 6950 2GB CFX unlocked
Processor: Intel i7-4970k
Mainboard: Asrock Z97 OC Formula
Memory: 16GB DDR3-1333
Soundcard:
PSU: Corsair RM1000
Default 05-11-2012, 17:26 | posts: 730

Too bad the newest Fluidmark does not work with Hybrid PhysX.
   
Reply With Quote
 
Old
  (#11)
Lane
Ancient Guru
 
Videocard: 2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
Processor: I7 4930K H2o EK Supremacy
Mainboard: Asus X79 Deluxe
Memory: G-Skill C9 2133mhz 16GB
Soundcard: X-FI Titanium HD + SP2500
PSU: CM 1000W
Default 05-12-2012, 18:57 | posts: 5,608 | Location: Switzerland

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spets View Post
Considering it's double the performance, I'd like to see some proper CUDA based benchmarks between the 680 and 580. Don't think the OpenCL benchmarks show what the 680 can really do.
Although GK110 will probably be a much less crippled version for GeForce Kepler.
Well OpenCL is one thing, but directompute benchmark show the same.. in SP performance and fluidmark physx, the 680 do well, but when it come to DP, things is over. The DP rate of the 680 is lower of the 580... I will rather see too more physX and cuda benchmark for get the result.

Last edited by Lane; 05-12-2012 at 19:04.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
Spets
Maha Guru
 
Spets's Avatar
 
Videocard: GTX780Ti+GTX750Ti+G-Sync
Processor: Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5
Mainboard: GA-Z68X-UD7-B3
Memory: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb 2133
Soundcard:
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA
Default 05-14-2012, 07:25 | posts: 2,084

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane View Post
Well OpenCL is one thing, but directompute benchmark show the same.. in SP performance and fluidmark physx, the 680 do well, but when it come to DP, things is over. The DP rate of the 680 is lower of the 580... I will rather see too more physX and cuda benchmark for get the result.
Yeah after a few reviews comparing the 680's SP to the 580 in CUDA, it flies well ahead. The card is too crippled when it comes to DP though. PhysX works well but I'd like to see the uncrippled Tesla GK110 in benchmarks compared to the 20-series
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright (c) 1995-2014, All Rights Reserved. The Guru of 3D, the Hardware Guru, and 3D Guru are trademarks owned by Hilbert Hagedoorn.