3D Mark 2005 Guru3d Records - Page 85

BlackZero · 06-06-2011, 14:21 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Not bad for an old g90 series Cowie.

42,668

single 6950
2600k @5.1Ghz

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5379488

MikeMK · 06-19-2011, 22:24 | posts: 10,497 | Location: London

Heres mine:

cole2109 · 06-26-2011, 02:53 | posts: 536 | Location: Slovenia

Khalam · 07-12-2011, 06:30 | posts: 883 | Location: Dublin/Ireland

ive finally managed to break 50k

Urban83 · 07-29-2011, 23:51 | posts: 47 | Location: Pula/Istra/Croatia

here is my score...

ricardonuno1980 · *Last edited by ricardonuno1980; 07-30-2011 at 12:23.*

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban83

here is my score...

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/615/capture5et.jpg

you get no good score because win7 x64 is slower than XP x86. you try test on XP but you need show all Graphics Tests scores.

I got 26505 3D Marks (GT1: 84.3fps; GT2: 72.8; GT3: 194.3) at AMD x6 1055T@3.32GHz and GTX 480 (stock 263.06beta driver) running XP-SP3 x86.

Lane · *Last edited by Lane; 07-30-2011 at 13:07.*

in 3Dmark05 , running vista , 7 or xp make only few difference. in 01 and Aquamark, it is, but this is cause they are not compatible. they have been released in 2001 and 2003 .. no need to search why.

in 05, the only thing who count is the CPU speed. ( and ofc power of this cpu )

Win7 x64 : 47'884

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5364541

Kalam have break his 50K on win7 x64

Khalam · 07-30-2011, 13:16 | posts: 883 | Location: Dublin/Ireland

ive actually rerun it in xp for the cracks to see what difference it gives

cowie · 07-30-2011, 14:45 | posts: 10,873 | Location: new jersey

,w7/vista adds enuogh to gain a few hundred more points..you cant be expecting thousands for the os in this bench.
nice run thuo khalam

Khalam · 07-30-2011, 18:33 | posts: 883 | Location: Dublin/Ireland

thanks bro, the difference between the two is my win7 run was with both 6990s, the xp run which is a few points higher with only 1

BlackZero · 10-07-2011, 01:09 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Just testing rig rebuild.

42,112

2600k@ 5Ghz
HD 6950@ 950/1450

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5413714

Garrgoyle · 12-17-2011, 08:05 | posts: 160 | Location: Shinra Corp.

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5425838

Garrgoyle · 12-22-2011, 04:42 | posts: 160 | Location: Shinra Corp.

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5426729

Lane · 04-13-2012, 14:13 | posts: 4,875 | Location: Switzerland

Just a little run single 7970 @ 1340/1520mhz - 2600K only at 5.1ghz.
(will do a 5.3-5.4ghz run later )

http://3dmark.com/3dm05/5444669

3Dmark 05: 46'595

cowie · *Last edited by cowie; 05-06-2012 at 19:36.*

I'll do better next time

tested my 560 hawk on stock cooling today too
+80mv for 1060

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

cowie · 06-21-2012, 00:11 | posts: 10,873 | Location: new jersey

I can do alittle better next time

Lane · 06-21-2012, 12:19 | posts: 4,875 | Location: Switzerland

Nice Cowie... 5.5ghz on this 3570K !

cole2109 · 06-21-2012, 16:25 | posts: 536 | Location: Slovenia

Very nice cowie

cowie · 06-21-2012, 23:22 | posts: 10,873 | Location: new jersey

Thanks you guys
I will edit this post if i do better tommorrow

Thats on dice btw

BlackZero · 12-11-2012, 22:42 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Initial run at stock clocks.

BlackZero · 12-18-2012, 15:10 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Second run at CCC max clocks on 7970 (1125/1575)

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5473972

BlackZero · 12-24-2012, 16:52 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Third run stock air max on 7970 (1275/1600), not pushing memory.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5474791

BlackZero · 12-27-2012, 00:54 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

A little higher on the CPU.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm05/5475105

Matt26LFC · 12-27-2012, 20:30 | posts: 2,282 | Location: UK

Finally, I have a new Record for 05, and I've taken Guru3d's 6950 record for this bench on the bot

Sorry BZ

BlackZero · 12-27-2012, 20:58 | posts: 8,078 | Location: United Kingdom

Looks like I'm going to have to put my old 6950 back in.

Nah, just kidding. Good going, Matt.